|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 25, 2018 9:34:07 GMT -5
From the 40 year old virgin's college roommate.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Sept 25, 2018 10:03:29 GMT -5
From the 40 year old virgin's college roommate. This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Here we go: Alinsky's Rules For Radicals - that has been the shop-worn playbook of the 'progressive' left for a while: 1. "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have." 2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people." 3. "Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy." 4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." 5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." 8. "Keep the pressure on." 9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." 10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition." 11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside"12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."13. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 25, 2018 10:06:20 GMT -5
From the 40 year old virgin's college roommate. This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Sept 25, 2018 10:09:42 GMT -5
This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. Ah that's the 'constructive alternative' rule eh? "We've fought about it so much - how about we just agree to stop fighting and go along with what I wanted all along." No it's not time to admit he isn't the best choice for the Supreme Court because he a) likely is and b) its up to the President and Senate to make the determination. Supreme Court judge is not a voted position and it's not about who you like or dislike or what their politics are - it's about their track record and quality as judges.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Sept 25, 2018 10:10:38 GMT -5
This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. So does Avannati or whatever his name is - do you find his claim of Kavanaugh abetting 'rape trains' credible? Does that meet your evidentiary standard?
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 25, 2018 10:14:01 GMT -5
Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. Ah that's the 'constructive alternative' rule eh? "We've fought about it so much - how about we just agree to stop fighting and go along with what I wanted all along." No it's not time to admit he isn't the best choice for the Supreme Court because he a) likely is and b) its up to the President and Senate to make the determination. Supreme Court judge is not a voted position and it's not about who you like or dislike or what their politics are - it's about their track record and quality as judges. I was metaphorically speaking. I realize I have no real say and the decision doesn't come down to what's decided in this thread, but thanks for the reminder.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 25, 2018 10:14:50 GMT -5
Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. So does Avannati or whatever his name is - do you find his claim of Kavanaugh abetting 'rape trains' credible? Does that meet your evidentiary standard? No, I don't believe that to be true. That lawyer is just a fame whore with an agenda. I don't believe a word he says. He has zero credibility with me.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Sept 25, 2018 10:23:37 GMT -5
From the 40 year old virgin's college roommate. He drank heavily in college? wow. that's shocking.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Sept 25, 2018 10:26:29 GMT -5
Oh speaking of the white Al Sharpton:
Attorney Michael Avenatti said his client might now not come forward against Brett Kavanaugh, and then locked his Twitter public profile from view. After two days of ginning up publicity with the news he has a “100 percent credible” accuser against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, adding that she has “multiple witnesses to corroborate her story” and that she is “willing to take a polygraph,” Avenatti appeared to walk back that assurance in a Tuesday morning tweet.
“Let me be clear: We will disclose the client’s name and accusations only when SHE is ready and we have adequate security measures in place. And not a moment before that,” Avenatti tweeted. “It is her choice and hers alone as to when to surface bc it is her life. We expect it within the next 36 hrs.”
A few minutes after this apparent walk back, where he appears to be blaming the woman if he does not deliver what he promised, Avenatti, the attorney for porn star Stormy Daniels made famous by CNN, locked public access to his Twitter account.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Sept 25, 2018 10:34:07 GMT -5
He drank heavily in college? wow. that's shocking. Yeah. And to the earlier point, this is not even character witness, it is only innuendo. Character witness would be about having seen how he treated other women, his GF, etc. To say someone 'seems capable of' is the purest innuendo. I am sure Roche saw Kavanaugh kill flies and mosquitoes. Maybe even stepped on a cockroach. The guy has a proven disregard for life! Call PETA - he's not fit to be on the SC.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Sept 25, 2018 11:25:43 GMT -5
This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. Why??? Nothing mentioned is even remotely substantiated. So any politician can now have a woman come up and say .. he showed me his cock once? You're OK with that? Oh yeah, libs don't care about law and process. This process makes me embarrassed even think that friends of mine are democrats. NEXT dem that runds for the WH, let's say he used the N word a LOT in college. Who cares if we have no witnesses.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 25, 2018 11:56:38 GMT -5
Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. Why??? Nothing mentioned is even remotely substantiated. So any politician can now have a woman come up and say .. he showed me his cock once? You're OK with that? Oh yeah, libs don't care about law and process. This process makes me embarrassed even think that friends of mine are democrats. NEXT dem that runds for the WH, let's say he used the N word a LOT in college. Who cares if we have no witnesses. Yes, i'm ok with women coming forward if a man commits a crime against them. I thought we were having a hearing on Thursday. Isn't that law and process? This process makes me embarrassed for you guys. I've at least said let's see how the process plays out. Let's hear these people out. If she doesn't show, have the vote. You guys play off every accusation like it's automatically a political smear against this poor defenseless judge. Maybe, just maybe, there's some truth here. And the good judge is possibly lying.
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Sept 25, 2018 11:56:50 GMT -5
This counts as what to you? If this is your evidentiary standard, let me point out to you that I believe Ramirez and Ford and the Democrats in general and their social circle were capable of mounting a character assassination. The Dems are serial offenders after all. What was that thing Saul Alinsky said...... Character witness for both sides. You know, the same defense the lying virgin was using a few days ago that no one seemed to have a problem with. Maybe it's time to just admit this asshole isn't the best choice for supreme court judge and move on. Who is this guy? What is his background? Clinical? Pysch doc? Even if he is this is meaning less publicity for him. His 15 minutes of being used up and discarded by the Liberal Dems. Any means to the end you want, legal, moral or otherwise. No one yet has proven BK has done anything but the Dems have proven themselves to be garbage feeding scumbags across the board. From the DNC, Mr. Ellision says hello, to Feinstein and the rest of their operatives. Pub's likability at a 7 year high. Heading into the Mids and with the Dems acting like complete scumbags on a world stage. Please write your senator, urge them to keep doing what they are doing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2018 11:59:18 GMT -5
This entire process has been a shit show. Not sure why anyone would care what the President’s opinion is for anyone who he has nominated and even had confirmed. There’s a pile of bodies because they sucked or didn’t kiss the ring enough for his liking.
There’s zero middle ground, either you completely believe your person or you’re the enemy.
Kavanaugh currently sits in job with a lifetime term, he will go back and be just fine. But this shows why no one will want to be involved in public service because it’s insane.
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Sept 25, 2018 12:02:44 GMT -5
Why??? Nothing mentioned is even remotely substantiated. So any politician can now have a woman come up and say .. he showed me his cock once? You're OK with that? Oh yeah, libs don't care about law and process. This process makes me embarrassed even think that friends of mine are democrats. NEXT dem that runds for the WH, let's say he used the N word a LOT in college. Who cares if we have no witnesses. Yes, i'm ok with women coming forward if a man commits a crime against them. I thought we were having a hearing on Thursday. Isn't that law and process? This process makes me embarrassed for you guys. I've at least said let's see how the process plays out. Let's hear these people out. If she doesn't show, have the vote. You guys play off every accusation like it's automatically a political smear against this poor defenseless judge. Maybe, just maybe, there's some truth here. And the good judge is possibly lying. Give me on shred of fucking proof from either women Frank. One fuck shred. I have not seen or read any. What I have seen and read is that the Dem have a smear campaign going to the ninth degree. The 4 people the Dr mentions all refute her story. The second one went around trying to remind people of what did not happen and she has also been rebuked as well. Give me some proof Frank. Just not CNN/Maddow accusations and fucking commentary. This is scary as shit as this could happen to anyone. Just an accusation. This is a Totalitarian approach and wrong.
|
|