|
Post by islesmb on Aug 1, 2018 9:31:16 GMT -5
we need to work in red and blue. And orange, yellow, indigo and violet! And change our name from the Jets to the Roy G. Biv's!
|
|
|
Post by cgjet on Aug 1, 2018 10:54:28 GMT -5
Why does this change the uniforms crap start about this time every season? Here's a thought, the Jets should concentrate of hiring coaches who can coach because a uniform does not make a good player.
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Aug 1, 2018 11:54:27 GMT -5
we need to work in red and blue. And orange, yellow, indigo and violet!
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Aug 1, 2018 13:18:23 GMT -5
How about we just send in pictures of the team in the existing uniforms? Why must they waste time on this nonsense?
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Aug 1, 2018 13:37:28 GMT -5
How about we just send in pictures of the team in the existing uniforms? Why must they waste time on this nonsense? It isn't a waste, it is a MUCH needed change. Their uniforms are boring and need to be redone with a cool looking fighter Jet on the side of the helmet. It's 2018, not 1964 anymore. The coaches and GM are probably not very involved in this nor are the players, so they will not be distracted and can focus all their energy on crappy play calling, crappy play making and crappy drafting. Don't you worry.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Aug 1, 2018 13:38:55 GMT -5
How about we just send in pictures of the team in the existing uniforms? Why must they waste time on this nonsense? It isn't a waste, it is a MUCH needed change. Their uniforms are boring and need to be redone with a cool looking fighter Jet on the side of the helmet. It's 2018, not 1964 anymore. The coaches and GM are probably not very involved in this nor are the players, so they will not be distracted and can focus all their energy on crappy play calling, crappy play making and crappy drafting. Don't you worry. I like the current uniforms. ALL of the new uniforms other teams are wearing look like crap and the Thursday night onesies are hideous.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Aug 1, 2018 13:41:40 GMT -5
It isn't a waste, it is a MUCH needed change. Their uniforms are boring and need to be redone with a cool looking fighter Jet on the side of the helmet. It's 2018, not 1964 anymore. The coaches and GM are probably not very involved in this nor are the players, so they will not be distracted and can focus all their energy on crappy play calling, crappy play making and crappy drafting. Don't you worry. I like the current uniforms. ALL of the new uniforms other teams are wearing look like crap and the Thursday night onesies are hideous. Oh, yes, the Thursday night ones suck. But, this will be a total redo. And the jets need a redo from top to bottom. In everything. Forever. This is the second best thing that could happen besides their highly anticipated move to Nome.
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Aug 1, 2018 13:43:04 GMT -5
How about we just send in pictures of the team in the existing uniforms? Why must they waste time on this nonsense? It isn't a waste, it is a MUCH needed change. Their uniforms are boring and need to be redone with a cool looking fighter Jet on the side of the helmet. It's 2018, not 1964 anymore. The coaches and GM are probably not very involved in this nor are the players, so they will not be distracted and can focus all their energy on crappy play calling, crappy play making and crappy drafting. Don't you worry. We had a fighter jet. Looked lame.
|
|
|
Post by Jetworks on Aug 1, 2018 14:25:38 GMT -5
It isn't a waste, it is a MUCH needed change. Their uniforms are boring and need to be redone with a cool looking fighter Jet on the side of the helmet. It's 2018, not 1964 anymore. The coaches and GM are probably not very involved in this nor are the players, so they will not be distracted and can focus all their energy on crappy play calling, crappy play making and crappy drafting. Don't you worry. We had a fighter jet. Looked lame. Not sure if it was actually a fighter jet? If it was, it looked to be something from the early 60s/late 50s.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Aug 1, 2018 14:51:54 GMT -5
We had a fighter jet. Looked lame. Not sure if it was actually a fighter jet? If it was, it looked to be something from the early 60s/late 50s. Yeah - it was a passenger jet. A horrible, old broken down looking 1960 passenger jet that look like it was about to crash in the ocean.
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Aug 2, 2018 7:50:06 GMT -5
you pessimistic muthafuckas
if the Jets FO is willing to post "We listened", its a good chance they WON'T screw it up because of the anticipated shitstorm they'd have to deal with if they did
common
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Aug 2, 2018 16:41:13 GMT -5
you pessimistic muthafuckas if the Jets FO is willing to post "We listened", its a good chance they WON'T screw it up because of the anticipated shitstorm they'd have to deal with if they did common LOL... bro.... Listened to WHO?? These morons ONLY listen to the wrong people. Every. Time. +
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Aug 2, 2018 20:31:48 GMT -5
you pessimistic muthafuckas if the Jets FO is willing to post "We listened", its a good chance they WON'T screw it up because of the anticipated shitstorm they'd have to deal with if they did common LOL... bro.... Listened to WHO?? These morons ONLY listen to the wrong people. Every. Time. + Yeah - as someone else said there is no way this is the original stokes - he was a cantankerous, miserable, disagreeable cunt and this person (whoever they are, I’m looking at you shankin’) isn’t nearly as miserable. Hi shakin/ new stokes and welcome to the board.
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Aug 3, 2018 9:52:15 GMT -5
LOL... bro.... Listened to WHO?? These morons ONLY listen to the wrong people. Every. Time. + Yeah - as someone else said there is no way this is the original stokes - he was a cantankerous, miserable, disagreeable cunt and this person (whoever they are, I’m looking at you shankin’) isn’t nearly as miserable. Hi shakin/ new stokes and welcome to the board. must be. that last post was the giveaway
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Aug 3, 2018 11:07:17 GMT -5
LOL... bro.... Listened to WHO?? These morons ONLY listen to the wrong people. Every. Time. + Yeah - as someone else said there is no way this is the original stokes - he was a cantankerous, miserable, disagreeable cunt and this person (whoever they are, I’m looking at you shankin’) isn’t nearly as miserable. Hi shakin/ new stokes and welcome to the board. It’s Hashman How the fuck did you guys miss this? lol
|
|