|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 16, 2019 9:52:19 GMT -5
The word on the street is she's a "crier". I think they were afraid of the optics if she started crying on them. They had her on perjury. Let her cry. TheLastRefuge (@thelastrefuge2) Tweeted: Ms. Yovanovitch opening statement is in direct contradiction to her testimony under oath. t.co/VGsEVzMf5M t.co/M1rrO3pP30 The Obama State Dept prepped her on Burisma/Hunter Biden issue for her confirmation. But she is a Dem so she will never be charged. |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 20, 2019 11:17:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 20, 2019 12:40:36 GMT -5
So Trump never told him, in fact he told him the direct opposite, (the only direct evidence Sondland has offered of anything) but he came to his own conclusion it was quid pro quo. He says "everyone knew" but when asked if he has evidence he says no and talks about a politico article thats said it was quid pro quo.
Is is me or are all these testimonies the personification of clickbait fake news headlines. Salacious opening statements but when you get into the meat of it everything is contradicted by the real evidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 20, 2019 12:46:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 20, 2019 13:26:22 GMT -5
Seen this reported in a few Euro sites but nothing from MSM. Guess they dont want it to explode at the impeachment hearing.
|
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 20, 2019 13:33:01 GMT -5
So Trump never told him, in fact he told him the direct opposite, (the only direct evidence Sondland has offered of anything) but he came to his own conclusion it was quid pro quo. He says "everyone knew" but when asked if he has evidence he says no and talks about a politico article thats said it was quid pro quo. Is is me or are all these testimonies the personification of clickbait fake news headlines. Salacious opening statements but when you get into the meat of it everything is contradicted by the real evidence. No case whatsoever. The evil part of me thinks Trump told people to give the Dims false hopes, but under sworn testimony, being asked a direct question, answer truthfully. Ultimate troll. |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 20, 2019 13:35:00 GMT -5
Seen this reported in a few Euro sites but nothing from MSM. Guess they dont want it to explode at the impeachment hearing. I love it when a plan comes together. ![]() |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 20, 2019 13:57:54 GMT -5
So Trump never told him, in fact he told him the direct opposite, (the only direct evidence Sondland has offered of anything) but he came to his own conclusion it was quid pro quo. He says "everyone knew" but when asked if he has evidence he says no and talks about a politico article thats said it was quid pro quo. Is is me or are all these testimonies the personification of clickbait fake news headlines. Salacious opening statements but when you get into the meat of it everything is contradicted by the real evidence. No case whatsoever. The evil part of me thinks Trump told people to give the Dims false hopes, but under sworn testimony, being asked a direct question, answer truthfully. Ultimate troll. It is quite remarkable. Their best "evidence" is someone's opinion and interpretation of events which they admit they have no evidence of. And the rest of their witnesses have said they have no actual evidence of anything. |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 20, 2019 14:04:14 GMT -5
No case whatsoever. The evil part of me thinks Trump told people to give the Dims false hopes, but under sworn testimony, being asked a direct question, answer truthfully. Ultimate troll. It is quite remarkable. Their best "evidence" is someone's opinion and interpretation of events which they admit they have no evidence of. And the rest of their witnesses have said they have no actual evidence of anything. and to lazy voters, all they'll remember is "Trump was impeached, and let off by his own party". |
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Nov 20, 2019 14:22:46 GMT -5
It is quite remarkable. Their best "evidence" is someone's opinion and interpretation of events which they admit they have no evidence of. And the rest of their witnesses have said they have no actual evidence of anything. and to lazy voters, all they'll remember is "Trump was impeached, and let off by his own party". Fuckin morons man. How can ppl be so stupid. I need to figure out how to get these fools as customers of something |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 20, 2019 14:54:34 GMT -5
LOL BNL had their account suspended after posting about Burisma's CEO getting indicted.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 20, 2019 15:02:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by vonrotten on Nov 20, 2019 18:39:25 GMT -5
I wish I was one of those people with more money than sense. If I was, I'd sue the gubmint for all of the taxpayer dollars wasted on this shit. How much for the Muller investigation? How much for this phony impeachment? Sadly, I have no sense and no money...and very little class :-(
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Nov 21, 2019 4:19:50 GMT -5
I wish I was one of those people with more money than sense. If I was, I'd sue the gubmint for all of the taxpayer dollars wasted on this shit. How much for the Muller investigation? How much for this phony impeachment? Sadly, I have no sense and no money...and very little class :-( All the folks on welfare and social security and folks in poor infrastructure areas should form a class action lawsuit against them for stealing their funds |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 21, 2019 11:29:39 GMT -5
Fox is talking about reports that the Dims will go for censure on Trump instead of an impeachment vote. This won't get to the Senate.
|
|
