|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 12, 2015 8:21:22 GMT -5
While were talking bout things we don't understand....what's up with the G Spot....is that areal thing?
|
|
|
Post by Bing© in Buffalo Chairman on Mar 12, 2015 8:37:40 GMT -5
While were talking bout things we don't understand....what's up with the G Spot....is that areal thing? It is....you need to position your finger up....its like a little switch inside and up if she's on her back, inside and down if she's on her knees....kinda like a toggle...but be gentle...and get ready for some gushing...
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Mar 12, 2015 11:53:48 GMT -5
I have no idea how the cap works. Each team has their own specific cap? Dead money? WTF? I've been a Jets fan since 1993 and I've never understood it. I just nod along and agree with the guy who rounds the smartest. WTF? 1993? You havent suffered long enough to be worthy to post!
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Mar 12, 2015 11:54:34 GMT -5
While were talking bout things we don't understand....what's up with the G Spot....is that areal thing? You will never learn having anal sex like you do................. on bottom of course for you.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Mar 12, 2015 12:10:37 GMT -5
While were talking bout things we don't understand....what's up with the G Spot....is that areal thing? Sorry friend, the good lord didn't put one in your butt.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Mar 12, 2015 12:58:16 GMT -5
There's not a lot of genius behind this contract. The low cap hit this year to make money available for Clay isn't all that impressive particularly when you balance it against how much money they will spend, even in guaranteed money, at a position that was not an urgent need for the team. The bigger problem is that, in typical Tannenbaum fashion, he's set up a contract that he can manipulate into an ever larger number until it is so much bloat on the cap that the Dolphins will turn into the 2011 Jets because he's juggling all these contracts trying to make a SB team today out of tomorrow's cap space. The difference between what he did with Suh and what he did with the Jets is that the cap is expected to grow to $190 million in 5 years. The cap didn't grow that rapidly when he was with the Jets and that is what got him in trouble. Along with that will come other large contracts. A major reason why the cap is growing so fast is because players are asking for and receiving increasingly larger contracts. When you pay QB money to a non-QB position you set a standard that QBs will want to exceed and the rising QB pay will in turn be used as a reason to increase all player salaries.
|
|
|
Post by bostonmajet on Mar 12, 2015 13:03:24 GMT -5
Sorry, but the Cap is growing because revenue is growing - they are tied together. More revenue from TV, now Thursday night games, and soon an expanded playoffs and extended season.
The contracts are getting bigger because the cap is getting bigger, not the other way around.
|
|
|
Post by 2milehighJet on Mar 12, 2015 13:27:42 GMT -5
I dont understand it either, but one thing I know is you will eventually pay for it, say hello to this year's Saints!!
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Mar 12, 2015 13:28:46 GMT -5
Sorry, but the Cap is growing because revenue is growing - they are tied together. More revenue from TV, now Thursday night games, and soon an expanded playoffs and extended season. The contracts are getting bigger because the cap is getting bigger, not the other way around. Plus now the NFL is getting into the internet business where they may soon start offering the NFL package over the internet. That will bring them more billions of dollars in revenue which would increase the cap even more. I think the cap is based on 48% of revenue brought in the previous year. So as long as that keeps going up so will the cap.
|
|
|
Post by vicmill on Mar 12, 2015 16:14:04 GMT -5
Fucking Tanny is a genius when it comes to the cap. All you have to do is look at that Suh contract. We're all wondering how they're going to fit it under the cap and try to keep Clay away from the Bills or Browns. It's a 6 year $114 million contract, $25 million signing bonus that gets paid right away but signing bonuses get spread over the life of the contract but can only get spread over a maximum of 5 years. So that 6th year there is no pro-rated portion of the signing bonus. They guaranteed the first 3 years of his contract. This is how the base salary and cap hits are over the next 3 years: 2015: $985,000 base salary, $5,100,000 pro rated signing bonus, $15,000 workout bonus. 2015 cap hit: $6,100,000 2016: $23,485,000 base salary, $5,100,000, $15,000. Cap Hit:$28,600,000 2017: $9,985,000 base, $5,100,000 $15,000 Cap Hit: $15,100,000 Now they purposely kept the cap hit low in 2015 in order to be able to match any front loaded deal the Bills or Browns may make. The dolphins are theoretically $14 million under the cap including the $7 million that is scheduled to be used on Clay with the transition tag and they're trying to re-work Wallace and Ellerbe to get more money. So most people would say then that whether it be the Bills or Browns they should put most of the money in the 2nd year of their offer b/c the Dolphins have so much invested in Suh in 2016. And I'm sure the Bills were thinking that as well b/c they released Chandler prematurely. But b/c Tanny is so GD smart what he's probably planning to do is turn that $23,485,000 of base salary into a signing bonus of $22,485,000 so that it gets evenly spread across the remaining 5 years of his deal. Which would make his base salary $1,000,000, $15,000 workout bonus, original pro-rated signing bonus of $5,100,000 and the new pro-rated signing bonus of $4,697,000 and a new cap hit in 2016 of $10,812,000. Giving them $18 million of extra cap room to be able to afford Clay and any possible long term deal they do with Tannehill. That's why they hired that bean counter. And the Bills are too stupid to realize that he's a lot smarter then those cousin fuckers. There's very little genius behind the cap. Basically its this: every $ paid to a player has to be accounted for in the cap. Could be this year's cap, next year's, the following year's, whatever. But every $ you pay hits the cap in some year. A GM can basically structure it to hit any year he wants with some very loose restrictions. If you think the act of deferring money from one year to the next requires genius, then so be it. Everyone used to call Tannenbaum a cap genius, but all he was doing was deferring money from year to year - big deal. As an old Midas commercial from before most of you were born used to say ... "you can pay me now or you can pay me later". There is no circumventing the cap.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Mar 12, 2015 18:52:26 GMT -5
Fucking Tanny is a genius when it comes to the cap. All you have to do is look at that Suh contract. We're all wondering how they're going to fit it under the cap and try to keep Clay away from the Bills or Browns. It's a 6 year $114 million contract, $25 million signing bonus that gets paid right away but signing bonuses get spread over the life of the contract but can only get spread over a maximum of 5 years. So that 6th year there is no pro-rated portion of the signing bonus. They guaranteed the first 3 years of his contract. This is how the base salary and cap hits are over the next 3 years: 2015: $985,000 base salary, $5,100,000 pro rated signing bonus, $15,000 workout bonus. 2015 cap hit: $6,100,000 2016: $23,485,000 base salary, $5,100,000, $15,000. Cap Hit:$28,600,000 2017: $9,985,000 base, $5,100,000 $15,000 Cap Hit: $15,100,000 Now they purposely kept the cap hit low in 2015 in order to be able to match any front loaded deal the Bills or Browns may make. The dolphins are theoretically $14 million under the cap including the $7 million that is scheduled to be used on Clay with the transition tag and they're trying to re-work Wallace and Ellerbe to get more money. So most people would say then that whether it be the Bills or Browns they should put most of the money in the 2nd year of their offer b/c the Dolphins have so much invested in Suh in 2016. And I'm sure the Bills were thinking that as well b/c they released Chandler prematurely. But b/c Tanny is so GD smart what he's probably planning to do is turn that $23,485,000 of base salary into a signing bonus of $22,485,000 so that it gets evenly spread across the remaining 5 years of his deal. Which would make his base salary $1,000,000, $15,000 workout bonus, original pro-rated signing bonus of $5,100,000 and the new pro-rated signing bonus of $4,697,000 and a new cap hit in 2016 of $10,812,000. Giving them $18 million of extra cap room to be able to afford Clay and any possible long term deal they do with Tannehill. That's why they hired that bean counter. And the Bills are too stupid to realize that he's a lot smarter then those cousin fuckers. There's very little genius behind the cap. Basically its this: every $ paid to a player has to be accounted for in the cap. Could be this year's cap, next year's, the following year's, whatever. But every $ you pay hits the cap in some year. A GM can basically structure it to hit any year he wants with some very loose restrictions. If you think the act of deferring money from one year to the next requires genius, then so be it. Everyone used to call Tannenbaum a cap genius, but all he was doing was deferring money from year to year - big deal. As an old Midas commercial from before most of you were born used to say ... "you can pay me now or you can pay me later". There is no circumventing the cap. Read my earlier response. And you should think Tanny is a genius b/c he's the only reason we got Curtis Martin from the Patriots. He put a poison pill in the offer to Curtis that the Patriots couldn't match. He may not have been a good personnel guys but he's a genius with the cap and money. Those are facts.
|
|
|
Post by sec.101row23 on Mar 12, 2015 19:31:08 GMT -5
Fucking Tanny is a genius when it comes to the cap. All you have to do is look at that Suh contract. We're all wondering how they're going to fit it under the cap and try to keep Clay away from the Bills or Browns. It's a 6 year $114 million contract, $25 million signing bonus that gets paid right away but signing bonuses get spread over the life of the contract but can only get spread over a maximum of 5 years. So that 6th year there is no pro-rated portion of the signing bonus. They guaranteed the first 3 years of his contract. This is how the base salary and cap hits are over the next 3 years: 2015: $985,000 base salary, $5,100,000 pro rated signing bonus, $15,000 workout bonus. 2015 cap hit: $6,100,000 2016: $23,485,000 base salary, $5,100,000, $15,000. Cap Hit:$28,600,000 2017: $9,985,000 base, $5,100,000 $15,000 Cap Hit: $15,100,000 Now they purposely kept the cap hit low in 2015 in order to be able to match any front loaded deal the Bills or Browns may make. The dolphins are theoretically $14 million under the cap including the $7 million that is scheduled to be used on Clay with the transition tag and they're trying to re-work Wallace and Ellerbe to get more money. So most people would say then that whether it be the Bills or Browns they should put most of the money in the 2nd year of their offer b/c the Dolphins have so much invested in Suh in 2016. And I'm sure the Bills were thinking that as well b/c they released Chandler prematurely. But b/c Tanny is so GD smart what he's probably planning to do is turn that $23,485,000 of base salary into a signing bonus of $22,485,000 so that it gets evenly spread across the remaining 5 years of his deal. Which would make his base salary $1,000,000, $15,000 workout bonus, original pro-rated signing bonus of $5,100,000 and the new pro-rated signing bonus of $4,697,000 and a new cap hit in 2016 of $10,812,000. Giving them $18 million of extra cap room to be able to afford Clay and any possible long term deal they do with Tannehill. That's why they hired that bean counter. And the Bills are too stupid to realize that he's a lot smarter then those cousin fuckers. There's very little genius behind the cap. Basically its this: every $ paid to a player has to be accounted for in the cap. Could be this year's cap, next year's, the following year's, whatever. But every $ you pay hits the cap in some year. A GM can basically structure it to hit any year he wants with some very loose restrictions. If you think the act of deferring money from one year to the next requires genius, then so be it. Everyone used to call Tannenbaum a cap genius, but all he was doing was deferring money from year to year - big deal. As an old Midas commercial from before most of you were born used to say ... "you can pay me now or you can pay me later". There is no circumventing the cap. Agree 100%. It's simple accounting. There is nothing complicated about it. It's just asset allocation.
|
|
|
Post by JB1089 on Mar 12, 2015 23:20:17 GMT -5
The ONLY reason Tannebaum got into trouble with the cap was because of the weird 2 year period we had at the end of the old CBA and the transition into the new one.
The cap was not only (nearly) frozen during those years, but there were restrictions placed on player movement for "Final 8" and "Final 4" teams. There were players that could have been cut (or pressured to restructure) but were kept on their current deals because we were not allowed to sign unrestricted free agents (with an exception I'll explain next), only players that had been cut. They we were only allowed to sign 1 UFA for each player we lost to unrestricted free agency (which would not include players that we cut) and that new signing could not be paid more than the player we lost was making from his new team. That's why our notable signings were guys like Tomlinson and Mason, older vets that had been cut, and why our major acquisitions were made via trade: Holmes and Cromartie.
It's hard to cut someone when you can't go right into the (substantially smaller, due to the addition of transition tags in addition to franchise tags, and the elimination of restricted free agency) pool of free agents to find a replacement. And cutting players is how teams free up space.
|
|
|
Post by vicmill on Mar 13, 2015 8:11:07 GMT -5
There's very little genius behind the cap. Basically its this: every $ paid to a player has to be accounted for in the cap. Could be this year's cap, next year's, the following year's, whatever. But every $ you pay hits the cap in some year. A GM can basically structure it to hit any year he wants with some very loose restrictions. If you think the act of deferring money from one year to the next requires genius, then so be it. Everyone used to call Tannenbaum a cap genius, but all he was doing was deferring money from year to year - big deal. As an old Midas commercial from before most of you were born used to say ... "you can pay me now or you can pay me later". There is no circumventing the cap. Read my earlier response. And you should think Tanny is a genius b/c he's the only reason we got Curtis Martin from the Patriots. He put a poison pill in the offer to Curtis that the Patriots couldn't match. He may not have been a good personnel guys but he's a genius with the cap and money. Those are facts. Or Belidick being ahead of his time didn't pay big money for anyone, much less a running back. How did it work out for the Pats? 3 SBs while Curtis was racking up a lot of yards for the Jets. Brilliant move by Tanny.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 13, 2015 8:21:31 GMT -5
Read my earlier response. And you should think Tanny is a genius b/c he's the only reason we got Curtis Martin from the Patriots. He put a poison pill in the offer to Curtis that the Patriots couldn't match. He may not have been a good personnel guys but he's a genius with the cap and money. Those are facts. Or Belidick being ahead of his time didn't pay big money for anyone, much less a running back. How did it work out for the Flats*? 3 SBs while Curtis was racking up a lot of yards for the Jets. Brilliant move by Tanny. This guy gets it.
|
|