|
|
Post by yankeejet22 on Apr 16, 2015 8:56:03 GMT -5
If we go Defense, Fowler>Ray>Beasley.
|
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Apr 16, 2015 12:44:36 GMT -5
If we go Defense, Fowler>Ray>Beasley. I'd go Fowler>Beasley>Dupree>Ray |
|
|
|
Post by sec.101row23 on Apr 17, 2015 9:01:39 GMT -5
But why (in god's name) does he need to play OLB?? why do people keep talking about it like well i don't know what's going to happen when he plays 2-3 yards -- fuck off with that already! I don't want him playing 2-3 yards of LOS. I want him right where he belongs, hand in the dirt, on the end. Did we not learn anything by wasting 3 years of Coples's time?? Who's to say we're going to line up in 30 fronts next year?? Bowles plays to the strength of the roster. If we took Ray, clearly that means we would be better served in base 40s, 46s , etc etc. I myself am giving zero fucks about the size/weight thing. For me, that is of no concern. I'd accept that as a concern for others, but not me... but i can't believe how narrow minded people are being what kind of front the Jets should be running next year... lets see, Ray/Richardson/Wilkerson/Coples, or Wikerson/Harrison/Richardson... hmmm i know which one i'll be fielding. We aren't running base 4-3 fronts. That shit went out the window as soon as we re-signed Harris for $7 million a year. The Jets are going to be a base 3-4 team, just as the Cardinals were under Bowles. So why the hell would we draft what basically amounts to a situational passrusher with the 6th overall pick? Give me one of the top wideouts so maybe this team can average more than 16 fucking points a game for a change. I'd much rather go after Harold, Mauldin, or the kid from UCLA in Round 2 over taking Ray at #6. Hell, Ray's teammate Markus Golden is a better fit if you ask me and he could be avilable in the 3rd. I'm not sure how you can come to that conclusion based on the facts at hand. First, Bowles runs a ton of nickel and dime formations, he used dime formations more than any other D coordinator in the league last season. Second, the free agent signings of Revis, Cro, Skrine, Gilchrist and Harris foreshadow a possible base nickel defense this season. If anything the Harris signing lends more credibility to this as stopping the run in a nickel can be a liability, Harris gives the Jets a very good run stopping ILB in those situations. |
|
|
|
Post by ryu79 on Apr 17, 2015 11:21:17 GMT -5
Wow. Emotive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Apr 17, 2015 11:26:03 GMT -5
We aren't running base 4-3 fronts. That shit went out the window as soon as we re-signed Harris for $7 million a year. The Jets are going to be a base 3-4 team, just as the Cardinals were under Bowles. So why the hell would we draft what basically amounts to a situational passrusher with the 6th overall pick? Give me one of the top wideouts so maybe this team can average more than 16 fucking points a game for a change. I'd much rather go after Harold, Mauldin, or the kid from UCLA in Round 2 over taking Ray at #6. Hell, Ray's teammate Markus Golden is a better fit if you ask me and he could be avilable in the 3rd. I'm not sure how you can come to that conclusion based on the facts at hand. First, Bowles runs a ton of nickel and dime formations, he used dime formations more than any other D coordinator in the league last season. Second, the free agent signings of Revis, Cro, Skrine, Gilchrist and Harris foreshadow a possible base nickel defense this season. If anything the Harris signing lends more credibility to this as stopping the run in a nickel can be a liability, Harris gives the Jets a very good run stopping ILB in those situations. I'm aware that he runs a ton of nickel formations. And while I usually agree that you can never have enough passrushers, I'm not totally on board with a guy like Ray at #6. Doesn't mean I don't like him, I just think that Fowler and even Beasley are better fits here. I could be totally wrong...it's happened before. And I admit I'm a bit biased towards taking one of the Top 3 wideouts at #6. |
|
