|
Post by freestater on Dec 9, 2014 10:47:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Dec 9, 2014 11:03:22 GMT -5
it got great reviews; a bit on the cerebral side, so that would explain you not getting it. you should prolly stick to chick rom-coms cuz you know.... Just trying to save you $12. Cerebral doesn't have to be boring. Someone should explain this to Terrence Malick.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 9, 2014 11:14:15 GMT -5
Dont waste your $12. Horrible 3 hour discussion about worm holes interspersed with the worst special effects I've seen in some time. They used absolutely no green screens on this movie. If you know that going in it makes a difference. Why? Would I be less bored?
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Dec 9, 2014 11:31:02 GMT -5
They used absolutely no green screens on this movie. If you know that going in it makes a difference. Why? Would I be less bored? can't fix stupid 'ceptin with a lobotomy.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 9, 2014 11:33:00 GMT -5
Why? Would I be less bored? can't fix stupid 'ceptin with a lobotomy. HOW a movie is made is irrelevant unless your a film nerd. It's the results that matter. Did you see the movie? Its simply NOT entertaining and the effects SUCK.
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Dec 9, 2014 11:34:30 GMT -5
can't fix stupid 'ceptin with a lobotomy. HOW a movie is made is irrelevant unless your a film nerd. It's the results that matter. Did you see the movie? Its simply NOT entertaining and the effects SUCK. Movies are subjective and yes I saw the movie - thought it was pretty good. Are you the bastard child of Roger Ebert?
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Dec 9, 2014 11:40:40 GMT -5
HOW a movie is made is irrelevant unless your a film nerd. It's the results that matter. Did you see the movie? Its simply NOT entertaining and the effects SUCK. Movies are subjective and yes I saw the movie - thought it was pretty good. Are you the bastard child of Roger Ebert? My Dad...
|
|