|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Jul 28, 2015 22:02:30 GMT -5
That thread is pure hilarious. This really can't get much better. The entire thread is gold, but this might be my favorite post. DR PAIN: I hope this moron hasn't reproduced.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jul 28, 2015 22:20:14 GMT -5
The kind of bullshit they convince themselves of is staggering
|
|
|
Post by jetstream23 on Jul 28, 2015 23:02:11 GMT -5
Their world is crumbling. They simply cannot compute this. It's like someone turned off gravity in Boston. 1+1=3. Dogs and cats living together. Chaos.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jul 28, 2015 23:59:49 GMT -5
That thread is pure hilarious. This really can't get much better. The entire thread is gold, but this might be my favorite post. DR PAIN: I hope this moron hasn't reproduced. This probably is the dumbest theory out there. First of all, it's probably not an unfair labor practice to request the phone, particularly as it is part of the NFL's integrity policy to consider in punishment for rule violations the extent to which the involved parties cooperate with the investigation and the NFL has a past practice of punishing players for failing to cooperate (e.g. Farve). Even if it is an unfair labor practice, the risk of destroying the phone far outweighs the benefit. Brady and the NFLPA could have asserted no punishment could be assigned to the failure to turn over the phone and still assert an unfair labor practice occurred. OTOH by destroying the phone there's a clear risk that Brady gets hit with spoilation sanctions. It's bad enough that the phone was destroyed in the first place but even worse that his supposed normal practice just happened to coincide with the day he talked to the investigators and curiously the phone prior to that one was never destroyed. The combination of the obvious effort to destroy evidence in probable litigation is good enough for sanctions. At a minimum it means the factfinder will infer that the phone contained conclusive evidence that Brady was involved in deflating the balls and sought to cover it up. He could also get hit with monetary sanctions and his potential unfair labor practice claim could be struck. If his attorneys told him to destroy the phone they could face disbarment. This whole nonsense might make a little sense if Goodell made either the original decision or the appeal so narrowly focused on the refusal to cooperate or destruction of the phone but he didn't. Just because some idiot in Boston happens to be a union member does not make him an expert on labor law.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Jul 29, 2015 6:57:10 GMT -5
"Done supporting the NFL thank god I convinced direc TV to give me a free Sunday ticket with no contract or obligation of any kind. Would feel sick if I had to pay for it. "
This is the definition of a pussy Pat fan!
|
|
|
Post by cgjet on Jul 29, 2015 10:39:23 GMT -5
So, let me get this straight, old man Kraft fires two employees linked to the scandal, now he denies any wrong doing. Hopefully, he keeps lying and gets his team additional sanctions. With regard to suing the NFL to get the cheater back on the field, the season will be well underway by the time this ever makes a courtroom. The cheater must be throwing a hissy fit and old man Kraft is attempting to placate him.
|
|