|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 29, 2016 11:29:55 GMT -5
The Hitler comparison is a tired old tactic and reeks of desperation. Its been used on Clinton, Bush, Obama, and many others undeserving of such nonsense. I hate it because it has the unintended effect or marginalizing that monsters atrocities. Repeating lies via careful editing, misrepresenting facts, sensationalizing, and playing on peoples fears is how MSM makes their money and push agendas. Now who does that sound like? Certainly no less than the ridiculous Hitler comparisons.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 29, 2016 11:31:57 GMT -5
This quote from Aldous Huxley seems to perfectly encapsulate how the press deals with people who do not share there liberal views.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 29, 2016 13:56:35 GMT -5
Wa wondering why Labor Unions support Hillary when Trump's platform is far better for the Union members? Perhaps Union Membership should call out their leadership for casting their lot with a candidate whose views on trade are against their own interest?
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 29, 2016 14:35:18 GMT -5
Wa wondering why Labor Unions support Hillary when Trump's platform is far better for the Union members? Perhaps Union Membership should call out their leadership for casting their lot with a candidate whose views on trade are against their own interest? There is a teamsters for trump facebook site. Also Trump has hired many union workers in Manhattan and new jersey. The white non college degree typical union worker will be voting trump. Trump us against TPP. Hillary is for it. Both sides are terrified of trump. Unfortunatyely for the unions they are no longer controlled by the italian mafia and the members will vote any way they want. You put Hillary against trump he will even win the minority vote in the unions. New york Times doing its best talking out both sides of their mouth. mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/30/business/donald-trump-unions.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2016 22:37:45 GMT -5
Trump is no Reagan, Reagan was able to deal with Tip Trump thinks Washington is a one way street. That's a different scene - Jimmy Carter had been DRUMMED out of the white house. Voodoo economics, etc...Tip had zero chance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 11:02:44 GMT -5
Trump is no Reagan, Reagan was able to deal with Tip Trump thinks Washington is a one way street. That's a different scene - Jimmy Carter had been DRUMMED out of the white house. Voodoo economics, etc...Tip had zero chance. If you listen to Trump he thinks you just walk right into the Oval office an 535 people just do what you say.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 30, 2016 11:47:23 GMT -5
That's a different scene - Jimmy Carter had been DRUMMED out of the white house. Voodoo economics, etc...Tip had zero chance. If you listen to Trump he thinks you just walk right into the Oval office an 535 people just do what you say. I think you are underestimating the IQ level Trump will be bringing in with him in his cabinet. Also he's funded himself he doesn't have his hand in anyone's pocket. The only people scared of Trump in office are people who are afraid of What America was supposed to be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 12:10:30 GMT -5
If you listen to Trump he thinks you just walk right into the Oval office an 535 people just do what you say. I think you are underestimating the IQ level Trump will be bringing in with him in his cabinet. Also he's funded himself he doesn't have his hand in anyone's pocket. The only people scared of Trump in office are people who are afraid of What America was supposed to be. It's not about IQ it's about politics. While money is the mothers milk of politics and is an endless asset to Trump no doubt he won't be bought but he will have to line pockets, which he can, I don't think he can buy or win over an electorate so to speak that consists of a majority of Democrats, women, and minorities, not to mention Vets some of which who are not on board with him.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 30, 2016 12:23:28 GMT -5
I think you are underestimating the IQ level Trump will be bringing in with him in his cabinet. Also he's funded himself he doesn't have his hand in anyone's pocket. The only people scared of Trump in office are people who are afraid of What America was supposed to be. It's not about IQ it's about politics. While money is the mothers milk of politics and is an endless asset to Trump no doubt he won't be bought but he will have to line pockets, which he can, I don't think he can buy or win over an electorate so to speak that consists of a majority of Democrats, women, and minorities, not to mention Vets some of which who are not on board with him. Suggest you read the article i posted in the thread a few down. It's long but a good read Part of it He Could Win Of all the dumb things that have been said about Trump by people who were too slow to get finance jobs and therefore wound up in journalism, perhaps the stupidest of all is the one you hear most: He’ll get killed in the general! This is a godsend for Democrats! Forty-state wipeout! And so it goes mindlessly on. Actually — and this is no endorsement of Trump, just an interjection of reality — that’s a crock. Of the Republicans now running, Trump likely has the best chance to beat Hillary Clinton, for two reasons: First, he’s the only Republican who can meaningfully expand the pie. Polls show a surprisingly large number of Democrats open to Trump. In one January survey by the polling form Mercury Analytics , almost 20 percent said they’d consider crossing over to him from Hillary. Even if that’s double the actual number, it’s still stunning. Could Ted Cruz expect to draw that many Democrats? Could Jeb? It’s an article of faith in Washington that Trump would tank the party’s prospects with minority voters. Sounds logical, especially if you’re a sensitive white liberal who considers the suggestion of a border wall a form of hate speech, but consider the baseline. In the last election, Romney got 6 percent of the black vote, and 27 percent of Hispanics. Trump, who’s energetic, witty and successful, will do worse? I wouldn’t bet on it. But the main reason Trump could win is because he’s the only candidate hard enough to call Hillary’s bluff. Republicans will say almost anything about Hillary, but almost none challenge her basic competence. She may be evil, but she’s tough and accomplished. This we know, all of us. But do we? Or is this understanding of Hillary just another piety we repeat out of unthinking habit, the political equivalent of, “you can be whatever you want to be,” or “breakfast is the most important meal of the day”? Trump doesn’t think Hillary is impressive and strong. He sees her as brittle and afraid. He may be right, based on his exchange with her just before Christmas. During a speech in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Trump said Hillary had been “schlonged” by Obama in the 2008 race. In response, the Clinton campaign called Trump a sexist. It’s a charge Hillary has leveled against virtually every opponent she’s faced, but Trump responded differently. Instead of scrambling to donate to breast cancer research, he pointed out that Hillary spent years attacking the alleged victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. That ended the conversation almost immediately. Read more: newyorkjetshampur.com/thread/5024/donald-trump-shocking-vulgar-right#ixzz3ykXu1Lhn
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 12:35:15 GMT -5
It's not about IQ it's about politics. While money is the mothers milk of politics and is an endless asset to Trump no doubt he won't be bought but he will have to line pockets, which he can, I don't think he can buy or win over an electorate so to speak that consists of a majority of Democrats, women, and minorities, not to mention Vets some of which who are not on board with him. Suggest you read the article i posted in the thread a few down. It's long but a good read Part of it He Could Win Of all the dumb things that have been said about Trump by people who were too slow to get finance jobs and therefore wound up in journalism, perhaps the stupidest of all is the one you hear most: He’ll get killed in the general! This is a godsend for Democrats! Forty-state wipeout! And so it goes mindlessly on. Actually — and this is no endorsement of Trump, just an interjection of reality — that’s a crock. Of the Republicans now running, Trump likely has the best chance to beat Hillary Clinton, for two reasons: First, he’s the only Republican who can meaningfully expand the pie. Polls show a surprisingly large number of Democrats open to Trump. In one January survey by the polling form Mercury Analytics , almost 20 percent said they’d consider crossing over to him from Hillary. Even if that’s double the actual number, it’s still stunning. Could Ted Cruz expect to draw that many Democrats? Could Jeb? It’s an article of faith in Washington that Trump would tank the party’s prospects with minority voters. Sounds logical, especially if you’re a sensitive white liberal who considers the suggestion of a border wall a form of hate speech, but consider the baseline. In the last election, Romney got 6 percent of the black vote, and 27 percent of Hispanics. Trump, who’s energetic, witty and successful, will do worse? I wouldn’t bet on it. But the main reason Trump could win is because he’s the only candidate hard enough to call Hillary’s bluff. Republicans will say almost anything about Hillary, but almost none challenge her basic competence. She may be evil, but she’s tough and accomplished. This we know, all of us. But do we? Or is this understanding of Hillary just another piety we repeat out of unthinking habit, the political equivalent of, “you can be whatever you want to be,” or “breakfast is the most important meal of the day”? Trump doesn’t think Hillary is impressive and strong. He sees her as brittle and afraid. He may be right, based on his exchange with her just before Christmas. During a speech in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Trump said Hillary had been “schlonged” by Obama in the 2008 race. In response, the Clinton campaign called Trump a sexist. It’s a charge Hillary has leveled against virtually every opponent she’s faced, but Trump responded differently. Instead of scrambling to donate to breast cancer research, he pointed out that Hillary spent years attacking the alleged victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. That ended the conversation almost immediately. Read more: newyorkjetshampur.com/thread/5024/donald-trump-shocking-vulgar-right#ixzz3ykXu1LhnSure he can win, he has the main ingredient, money. However, eventually when it gets down to a few candidates he is going to have some substance right now he is trying to get name recognition and attention by hitting everyone over the head with a bat that will only go so far.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Jan 30, 2016 12:42:00 GMT -5
Suggest you read the article i posted in the thread a few down. It's long but a good read Part of it He Could Win Of all the dumb things that have been said about Trump by people who were too slow to get finance jobs and therefore wound up in journalism, perhaps the stupidest of all is the one you hear most: He’ll get killed in the general! This is a godsend for Democrats! Forty-state wipeout! And so it goes mindlessly on. Actually — and this is no endorsement of Trump, just an interjection of reality — that’s a crock. Of the Republicans now running, Trump likely has the best chance to beat Hillary Clinton, for two reasons: First, he’s the only Republican who can meaningfully expand the pie. Polls show a surprisingly large number of Democrats open to Trump. In one January survey by the polling form Mercury Analytics , almost 20 percent said they’d consider crossing over to him from Hillary. Even if that’s double the actual number, it’s still stunning. Could Ted Cruz expect to draw that many Democrats? Could Jeb? It’s an article of faith in Washington that Trump would tank the party’s prospects with minority voters. Sounds logical, especially if you’re a sensitive white liberal who considers the suggestion of a border wall a form of hate speech, but consider the baseline. In the last election, Romney got 6 percent of the black vote, and 27 percent of Hispanics. Trump, who’s energetic, witty and successful, will do worse? I wouldn’t bet on it. But the main reason Trump could win is because he’s the only candidate hard enough to call Hillary’s bluff. Republicans will say almost anything about Hillary, but almost none challenge her basic competence. She may be evil, but she’s tough and accomplished. This we know, all of us. But do we? Or is this understanding of Hillary just another piety we repeat out of unthinking habit, the political equivalent of, “you can be whatever you want to be,” or “breakfast is the most important meal of the day”? Trump doesn’t think Hillary is impressive and strong. He sees her as brittle and afraid. He may be right, based on his exchange with her just before Christmas. During a speech in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Trump said Hillary had been “schlonged” by Obama in the 2008 race. In response, the Clinton campaign called Trump a sexist. It’s a charge Hillary has leveled against virtually every opponent she’s faced, but Trump responded differently. Instead of scrambling to donate to breast cancer research, he pointed out that Hillary spent years attacking the alleged victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. That ended the conversation almost immediately. Read more: newyorkjetshampur.com/thread/5024/donald-trump-shocking-vulgar-right#ixzz3ykXu1LhnSure he can win, he has the main ingredient, money. However, eventually when it gets down to a few candidates he is going to have some substance right now he is trying to get name recognition and attention by hitting everyone over the head with a bat that will only go so far. When he wins Iowa Tuesday which he will. Who's left? Cruz has already pulled his ads attacking Trump and is focused on Rubio jockeying for the 2 spot. Rubio in turn did the same. IQ certainly played into skipping that debate and seeing the trap that was lying ahead with Fox tryingto destroy candidates with video of former positions. IQ buisness smarts sociopathic mind games are just as big a part as money. Trump is already solidified as the number one spot even the career politicians cruz and Rubio know it. Cruz was on record saying Trump wins Iowa he is Unstoppable. They are just fighting for the scraps now. Games already over
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 12:48:26 GMT -5
Sure he can win, he has the main ingredient, money. However, eventually when it gets down to a few candidates he is going to have some substance right now he is trying to get name recognition and attention by hitting everyone over the head with a bat that will only go so far. When he wins Iowa Tuesday which he will. Who's left? Cruz has already pulled his ads attacking Trump and is focused on Rubio jockeying for the 2 spot. Rubio in turn did the same. IQ certainly played into skipping that debate and seeing the trap that was lying ahead with Fox tryingto destroy candidates with video of former positions. IQ buisness smarts sociopathic mind games are just as big a part as money. Trump is already solidified as the number one spot even the career politicians cruz and Rubio know it. Cruz was on record saying Trump wins Iowa he is Unstoppable. They are just fighting for the scraps now. Games already over Maybe, Idk, sometimes I think yes sometimes no. No competition in the primary then people that don't want the Clintons in the WH it would have to be almost a perfect storm. We will see.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 30, 2016 15:02:18 GMT -5
If you listen to Trump he thinks you just walk right into the Oval office an 535 people just do what you say. I think you are underestimating the IQ level Trump will be bringing in with him in his cabinet. Also he's funded himself he doesn't have his hand in anyone's pocket. The only people scared of Trump in office are people who are afraid of What America was supposed to be.I wish I could believe that... I fully believe he only wants a piece of that tax money he has always wished he could get, that keeps him from being one of the true "reptilian" elite, if you will. He'll have no problem at all turning the entire country into Flint part II while he's funneling all the tax money to his personal bank accounts. Oh, and he wants to ramp up the police state on top of all that... (harassing and arresting innocent citizens instead of actually going after real criminals which there is no shortage) He would single handedly destroy the country. Like to ashes. But at least he would be king of the ashes. Oh, no question he's getting the Red Team nomination tho.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Feb 1, 2016 8:25:59 GMT -5
I think you are underestimating the IQ level Trump will be bringing in with him in his cabinet. Also he's funded himself he doesn't have his hand in anyone's pocket. The only people scared of Trump in office are people who are afraid of What America was supposed to be.I wish I could believe that... I fully believe he only wants a piece of that tax money he has always wished he could get, that keeps him from being one of the true "reptilian" elite, if you will. He'll have no problem at all turning the entire country into Flint part II while he's funneling all the tax money to his personal bank accounts. Oh, and he wants to ramp up the police state on top of all that... (harassing and arresting innocent citizens instead of actually going after real criminals which there is no shortage) He would single handedly destroy the country. Like to ashes. But at least he would be king of the ashes. Oh, no question he's getting the Red Team nomination tho. Expand on the "Flint part II" comment? What exactly do you mean by that? The Flint water situation was created by government trying to "create jobs". The paid MORE not less for the Flint water system and it was all government. Don't buy into the propaganda that says this was privatization and money cutting. It was a good old fashioned "stimulus" project gone wrong. Just because the media keeps repeating the lie doesn't make it true.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 1, 2016 8:29:46 GMT -5
Expand on the "Flint part II" comment? A festering shithole. With poison water. And banned rainwater collection. And just LOOK at this asshole!
|
|