|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Feb 10, 2016 18:55:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Feb 10, 2016 19:45:10 GMT -5
The bitch will clearly lose all elective things with these primaries and what not, but will still be elected because she bought all of these "delegates" total bullshit. The only thing all this voting is proving is that to get to the white house, you buy your ticket there and that's all their is to it. nAh, It's gonna get harder for Bernie as this goes on, she's been planning this for about 20 years |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Feb 10, 2016 21:13:57 GMT -5
The bitch will clearly lose all elective things with these primaries and what not, but will still be elected because she bought all of these "delegates" total bullshit. The only thing all this voting is proving is that to get to the white house, you buy your ticket there and that's all their is to it. nAh, It's gonna get harder for Bernie as this goes on, she's been planning this for about 20 years Possibly but she is a crook and very unlikable. She has no charisma, she is not her husband. I think she has an uphill climb. If someone like Bloomberg or Biden join the race then I think she is done. |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 11, 2016 12:41:04 GMT -5
No, my issue is with unprincipled profiteering politicians. She operated in the system and has shown herself to be beholden to the highest bidder. Not a crime, but not someone I would vote for because she does not give a shit about me since I have not paid the going price for her loyalty. Do you think any of them have a second thought about you? Not "me" in the personal sense. But "me" as in the people who are doing all the living, working, and dying in this country. |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 11, 2016 12:45:07 GMT -5
No, my issue is with unprincipled profiteering politicians. She operated in the system and has shown herself to be beholden to the highest bidder. Not a crime, but not someone I would vote for because she does not give a shit about me since I have not paid the going price for her loyalty. What politician would you vote for because they give a shit about you? You are very literal when it serves your purpose. I meant me as in "people". You know, the one's who don't contribute six figures or more to get them elected to office. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Feb 11, 2016 14:34:30 GMT -5
What politician would you vote for because they give a shit about you? You are very literal when it serves your purpose. I meant me as in "people". You know, the one's who don't contribute six figures or more to get them elected to office. Sorry, actually thought you being literal. But common, your a smart guy, you know it takes a mountain of cash to get elected in the country. Thats the way it works. |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 11, 2016 15:28:55 GMT -5
You are very literal when it serves your purpose. I meant me as in "people". You know, the one's who don't contribute six figures or more to get them elected to office. Sorry, actually thought you being literal. But common, your a smart guy, you know it takes a mountain of cash to get elected in the country. Thats the way it works. The speaking fees and "donations" to the Clinton foundation are not election contributions. They are "legal" payouts to a politician. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Feb 11, 2016 15:33:42 GMT -5
Sorry, actually thought you being literal. But common, your a smart guy, you know it takes a mountain of cash to get elected in the country. Thats the way it works. The speaking fees and "donations" to the Clinton foundation are not election contributions. They are "legal" payouts to a politician. Understood. |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 11, 2016 15:52:45 GMT -5
You are very literal when it serves your purpose. I meant me as in "people". You know, the one's who don't contribute six figures or more to get them elected to office. Sorry, actually thought you being literal. But common, your a smart guy, you know it takes a mountain of cash to get elected in the country. Thats the way it works. Does it?? This is a list of each candidates' campaign "committee" money and then their "outside" PAC money (https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/) Clinton: $115,563,929 + $48,109,057 = $163,645,986 Bush: $31,922,100 + $118,361,996 = $150,284,096 Cruz: $47,086,857 + $42,455,837 = $86,542,694 Sanders: $75,023,152 + $31,911 = $75,055,063 Rubio: $29,710,092 + $31,851,722 = $61,561,814 Trump: $19,405,217 + $1,894,509 = $21,299,723 Neither Sanders nor Trump take money from any of the large donors or super PAC's (all of whom are not "donating" so much as they are "buying"), and Trump is leading in the GOP with Sanders having thumped Clinton in NH and now in a virtual tie with her in National Polls. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Feb 11, 2016 19:08:30 GMT -5
Sorry, actually thought you being literal. But common, your a smart guy, you know it takes a mountain of cash to get elected in the country. Thats the way it works. Does it?? This is a list of each candidates' campaign "committee" money and then their "outside" PAC money (https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/) Clinton: $115,563,929 + $48,109,057 = $163,645,986 Bush: $31,922,100 + $118,361,996 = $150,284,096 Cruz: $47,086,857 + $42,455,837 = $86,542,694 Sanders: $75,023,152 + $31,911 = $75,055,063 Rubio: $29,710,092 + $31,851,722 = $61,561,814 Trump: $19,405,217 + $1,894,509 = $21,299,723 Neither Sanders nor Trump take money from any of the large donors or super PAC's (all of whom are not "donating" so much as they are "buying"), and Trump is leading in the GOP with Sanders having thumped Clinton in NH and now in a virtual tie with her in National Polls. And you know they are the rare exceptions who prove the rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Feb 11, 2016 22:14:04 GMT -5
Does it?? This is a list of each candidates' campaign "committee" money and then their "outside" PAC money (https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/) Clinton: $115,563,929 + $48,109,057 = $163,645,986 Bush: $31,922,100 + $118,361,996 = $150,284,096 Cruz: $47,086,857 + $42,455,837 = $86,542,694 Sanders: $75,023,152 + $31,911 = $75,055,063 Rubio: $29,710,092 + $31,851,722 = $61,561,814 Trump: $19,405,217 + $1,894,509 = $21,299,723 Neither Sanders nor Trump take money from any of the large donors or super PAC's (all of whom are not "donating" so much as they are "buying"), and Trump is leading in the GOP with Sanders having thumped Clinton in NH and now in a virtual tie with her in National Polls. And you know they are the rare exceptions who prove the rule. and to be honest Trump is spending his own money which I am fine with. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Feb 12, 2016 9:40:18 GMT -5
How do they get away with it?
Hillary just went the entire debate with not a single question being asked about her emails. And her Foundation has just been subpoenad by the State Department investigators. Not a question.
And this was on PBS.
The two biggest exchanges involved debates about Henry Kissinger and Clinton accusing Sanders of not having Obama's back. Cant make this shit up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Feb 12, 2016 11:01:06 GMT -5
How do they get away with it? Hillary just went the entire debate with not a single question being asked about her emails. And her Foundation has just been subpoenad by the State Department investigators. Not a question. And this was on PBS. The two biggest exchanges involved debates about Henry Kissinger and Clinton accusing Sanders of not having Obama's back. Cant make this shit up. PBS is ultraliberal and owned by the government. You expected them to be hard on dems? Did they ask her for her brownie recipe? |
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 12, 2016 11:14:12 GMT -5
How do they get away with it? Hillary just went the entire debate with not a single question being asked about her emails. And her Foundation has just been subpoenad by the State Department investigators. Not a question. And this was on PBS. The two biggest exchanges involved debates about Henry Kissinger and Clinton accusing Sanders of not having Obama's back. Cant make this shit up. PBS is ultraliberal and owned by the government. You expected them to be hard on dems? Did they ask her for her brownie recipe? |
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Feb 12, 2016 11:35:10 GMT -5
We're talking about two pieces of shit that literally stole 190000 dollars worth of china and furniture from the white house when they left. And removed w's from all the keyboards when bush came in. The list on the clintons is so fucking long I dont have the energy. 123 Deal, 300 million in bailouts then declared bankruptcy moved to china. The Clintons are bought and sold through China. Absolute scumbags and her daughter is a hideous looking fucking troll as ugly as her puffed up painted face. Democrats other prayer is a socialist atheist Jew from Brooklyn . Good luck democrats
|
|
