|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 28, 2016 9:29:01 GMT -5
Question for the group on trades. Last year, a couple of folks asked about trades involving players or future picks. Personally, I prefer to limit trades to 2016 draft picks -- I think it is easier to make sure they are realistic given the trade value chart. Trades involving players tend to be more complicated by salary cap, contractual issues, etc.
If majority want trades to be able to involve players or future picks, we can do that. Although I would prefer to keep it simple by limiting to 2016 draft picks.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 28, 2016 9:48:44 GMT -5
All trades should be for 2016 picks only IMO. It makes it easier too evaluate someones draft when all is said and done.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 28, 2016 20:35:00 GMT -5
How will we work the robo picks?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paradis on Mar 28, 2016 23:33:34 GMT -5
The Cleveland Browns select; Jaylon Smith, Linebacker - Notre Dame
Meanwhile, back at Browns headquarters...
The overpaid exec hangs up his oversized phone, wearing a huge smirk...
"Oh yea, nailed it"
Looks from other suite-wearing men around the room tell Exec that somethings wrong. Heads shake. Faces are palmed.
"What?... What's the problem? You told me he was bullet proof. John - at the christmas party, you said we have to get this guy"
Men begin filing out of the room.
"What?!..."
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 29, 2016 7:20:36 GMT -5
How will we work the robo picks? I like to keep it simple. Judgement call based on needs and scheme fit from among the 5 top ranked available players from the Player Data sheet. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 29, 2016 7:24:07 GMT -5
The Cleveland Browns select; Jaylon Smith, Linebacker - Notre Dame Meanwhile, back at Browns headquarters...The overpaid exec hangs up his oversized phone, wearing a huge smirk... "Oh yea, nailed it" Looks from other suite-wearing men around the room tell Exec that somethings wrong. Heads shake. Faces are palmed. "What?... What's the problem? You told me he was bullet proof. John - at the christmas party, you said we have to get this guy" Men begin filing out of the room. "What?!..." Chad Reuter of NFL.com has us taking him with the #20 pick. According to Reuter, "The Jets take the long view on Smith, who is recovering from knee surgery, and go for true value." |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 29, 2016 9:50:27 GMT -5
The Cleveland Browns select; Jaylon Smith, Linebacker - Notre Dame Meanwhile, back at Browns headquarters...The overpaid exec hangs up his oversized phone, wearing a huge smirk... "Oh yea, nailed it" Looks from other suite-wearing men around the room tell Exec that somethings wrong. Heads shake. Faces are palmed. "What?... What's the problem? You told me he was bullet proof. John - at the christmas party, you said we have to get this guy" Men begin filing out of the room. "What?!..." Chad Reuter of NFL.com has us taking him with the #20 pick. According to Reuter, "The Jets take the long view on Smith, who is recovering from knee surgery, and go for true value." Chad Reuter is a fucking moron. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 29, 2016 10:04:19 GMT -5
Chad Reuter of NFL.com has us taking him with the #20 pick. According to Reuter, "The Jets take the long view on Smith, who is recovering from knee surgery, and go for true value." Chad Reuter is a fucking moron. When I first saw his mock, I assumed I clicked on an old link -- figured it had to be from December or January. |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 31, 2016 9:59:31 GMT -5
Peebag will be the GM of the Bengals going forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 31, 2016 10:25:19 GMT -5
Peebag will be the GM of the Bengals going forward. Got it. Thanks. Anyone else wants in -- I will give up the Packers. |
|
|
|
Post by Paradis on Mar 31, 2016 22:24:12 GMT -5
If we any late comers want to sneak in, i don't mind giving up a team to. Just holla
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Apr 1, 2016 6:40:56 GMT -5
If anyone else wants in, let me know. I have two teams and between drafting for 2 teams and running the draft, its going to be a bit much. If someone wants to join the draft (and take the Packers off my hands), let me know by PM. For details, check out the mock draft discussion thread in the draft forum.
Paradis also mentioned that he will give up one team if anyone else wants in.
Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 8:09:28 GMT -5
In the Hampur mock draft......
All you QB needy teams......I'm listening.........
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Apr 1, 2016 9:52:31 GMT -5
Stark has the Packers. Will update the lineup and sheet this afternoon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Apr 1, 2016 9:59:37 GMT -5
I have a feeling the Bengals Hampur draft will be better than the 1974 Steelers draft.
Just my gut feeling.
|
|
