I'm ready for the race war.

perhaps "outrageworthy" would have been a better choice of words. was there a racial component to the reporting you saw? serious question. to my point, if the tables were turned, it would still be the top story on every channel, hillary would have made it a core component of her campaign, blah blah blah

disgraceful bias

Im no lawyer, but yes and no. You are correct, you cant block an entrance legally, nor physically harass anyone.  But they were blocking a bridge, and white and Asian students could walk around and cross the creek. I don't know if that would hold up in a court of law as blocking an entrance.

But it may be a non-issue - reports say that they "violently rebuffed" people trying to get through, and there's no excuse for violent protest. The minute any one of them got violent, security or the cops should have been there.

The whole thing is ridiculous to me, because by protesting for "safe spaces" for some, they are infringing on everyone else's "safe space". Racism in the service of activism is still racism. They're so called progressives, but there's nothing progressive about making whites and Asians (the poor Asians, swept up in all this, having to hop rock to rock across the creek bed) walk around the long way.

Thats fair.  I think I read it in the NY Post first.  The headline was something like "Attacks stoke racial tension", and article did mention the father saying "draw your own conclusions about it being race related".  It did mention the races of attackers and victims, and that the FBI was looking into whether or not it was a hate crime, but also that the Philly police Lt said "there was no indication race was involved". A lot of pussy footing around. I agree, they're all scared to call it race related.  

I will say, back when I was in college, poor white "townies" used to target small groups or solo college kids walking around at night, because we were well off and there was resentment, and if you're going to rob someone, target someone who may have some money. So there certainly could be a socio-economic element to the attacks as well.

Im not arguing that particular item. What I'm questioning is "is a bridge on a public sidewalk an entrance, in the eyes of the law?" They weren't blocking a doorway, for instance.

And its funny you mention a permit - I haven't seen mention, but UC being run by Janet Napolitano... I wonder if they had a permit, or other permission, and its being kept quiet?  I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing was sanctioned. 

And at the end of the day, I'm more or less in agreement... the minute any one of them pushed or otherwise touched me to prevent my passing, its a whole different ballgame.

I'll let the stat king of this board, DDNY, back up my claim that most violent crimes in this country are committed by poor Black males.  Fact.  

They are on the top of the list that "must go".  Then you have the white trash (meth heads, etc.).  They are next.  Then you have the criminal Hispanic gangs like in LA.  

Note that no matter how poor Indian (as in India), or Koreans, or Chinese people are in this country, they rarely commit violent crimes.  Tells you something.

We'd clean up society real quick if we imposed capital punishment.

You commit a violent robbery = you hang.
You murder = you hang.
You rape = you hang.
You assault another human being except in self defense = 10 years minimum
You sell drugs = you hang.

Etc.  All inner cities would be a lovely place to walk down at 11pm on any given night.

Those black teenagers in Philly who stomped on that white girls head? Hang em high.

That white college kid who was found guilty of raping that chick on the West Coast who only got 6 months? Hang em (or at the very least, castration).