|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Nov 24, 2016 15:36:34 GMT -5
I hear ya Southpark. I just still can't get over how ugly the left is. When you look at people like Ff2 and Lena Dunham, you have to think that their obscene, almost super ugliness has some bearing on their warped views. I honestly think they hate traditional American values held dear by us beautiful people (I.e. Real Americans) because they are so butt ugly. If you put out a casting call for the "ugliest people ever", people like Ff2 and some of these ugly dems I see on TV and in the streets would fit the bill. It's like they are ugly inside and out. I know it's hard for us beautiful people to understand. Must be tough being so ugly in a society that is obsessed with beauty though. Oh well, fuck them. We won, they lost. Victory! Yes!!! Oh cool a Lea Dunham reference. Thats some clever fresh insight from you. But you respect "everyone'. Just stating facts from the election. You know, like the CNN report: "30 percent of Hispanics voted for Trump, 54 percent of white women voted for Trump and 99.9 percent of ugly fucks who couldn't get laid in a morgue voted for Hillary." Even the main stream media reporterd that. |
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Nov 25, 2016 8:00:39 GMT -5
Blow me..we won.  Trump won. Don't wait for your prize. How many of your beloved clients you care so much about will benefit from the elimination of the estate tax? www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/trump-tax-plan-cuts-wealthy-low-income-inequality?CMP=fb_guTrump's tax plan: massive cuts for the 1% will usher 'era of dynastic wealth' More than eight million low-income and single-parent families will face sharp tax increases under Donald Trump exacerbating income inequality, experts warn
trump
Under Donald Trump’s proposed tax plan, the most wealthy Americans will recieve an average annual tax cut of $215,000 President Donald Trump is set to give America’s richest 1% an average annual tax cut of $214,000 when he takes office, while more than eight million families with children are expected to suffer financially under his proposed tax plan. On the eve of the election, Trump promised to “massively cut taxes for the middle class, the forgotten people, the forgotten men and women of this country, who built our country”. But independent expert analyses of Trump’s tax plan show that America’s millionaire and billionaire class will win big at the expense of struggling low- and middle-income people, who turned out in large numbers to help the real estate billionaire win the election. Experts warn that Trump’s tax plan will exacerbate America’s already chronic income inequality and herald in a “new era of dynastic wealth”. “The Trump tax plan is heavily, heavily, skewed to the most wealthy, who will receive huge savings,” said Lily Batchelder, a law professor and tax expert at New York University. “At the same time, millions of low-income families – particularly single-parent households – will face an increase.” Batchelder, who wrote an academic paper on Trump’s tax plan published by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said that the president-elect’s plan “significantly raises taxes” for at least 8.5 million families, with “especially large tax increases for working single parents”. More than 26m individuals live in those families. According to Batchelder’s research Trump’s tax changes – taken at their “most conservative” – could leave just over half of America’s nearly 11m single-parent households facing an increased tax burden. This figure rises to 61% – or 7m households – if the analysis is run on “reasonable assumptions” that the changes Trump has suggested go ahead. Single-parent families would suffer the most because Trump would lower the minimum of tax-free earnings to $15,000 per adult no matter how many children in the household. Under current law the threshold is $17,400 for single-parent families with one child and $24,750 for a couple with one child, and the threshold increases by $4,050 for each additional child. Trump also plans to consolidate the current seven tax breaks into three: 12%, 25% and 33%. His plan would scrap the current 10% tax for earnings under $19,625 and replace it with 12%. Trump’s proposed childcare credits would not make up for the changes, according to Batchelder. Minority families are set to suffer disproportionately from the tax increases, according to Batchelder. With 32% of African American families facing a tax increase compared with 19% of whites, this is mostly due to African American families being more likely to share the burden of childcare within the family and hence not benefit as much from Trump childcare credits. Batchelder said the effective tax increase for many millions of families would run into the thousands. While the poor will face tax increases, the Tax Policy Center research said the rich would received big tax cuts that get even bigger as you work up the income scale. The top 20% of earners would receive an average annual tax cut of $16,660 compared with an overall average cut of $2,940. The richest 1% will collect 47% of all the tax cuts – an average saving of $214,000. The 0.1% – the 117,000 households with incomes of more than $3.7m – would receive an average 2017 tax cut of $1.3m, a nearly 19% drop in tax they were due to pay in 2016. The tax savings of the super-rich will increase further in future, with the 0.1%’s estimated 2025 tax bill to fall by $1.5m. It is a stark contrast to Hillary Clinton’s tax plan, which would have seen taxes rises for the super-wealthy. Under her plan, the top 1% would pay an extra $163,000 a year more on average, and would have made up 93% of all new tax revenue by 2025. Clinton and Trump promised very different tax plans during the election. Composite: Justin Sullivan/ Mike Segar/Getty/Reuters “Listening to Trump’s rhetoric, most Americans probably don’t realise at all the impact of Trump’s tax plan,” Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) said. “Any way you slice it, the very best-off Americans will be the biggest beneficiaries. “If it looks bad now for middle-income families, those who turned out to vote for him, it’s only likely to get worse [with Trump as president]. It is very likely that they will end up poorer still. The most likely victims are middle- and low-income families.”Gardner said that under Trump, America will become even more divided between the rich and poor. “America is already very unequal, and his proposals would make income inequality a lot worse,” Gardner said. “This is obviously quite worrisome. If he rode to victory on a middle-income wave of support, those middle Americans will be very disappointed.” The inequality problem will be exacerbated by Trump’s plan to scrap inheritance tax – which he refers to as “the death tax”. The 40% inheritance tax is currently only charged on personal estate worth more than $5.45m and joint estates of $10.9m – sums so large that it only affects less than two in 1,000 Americans. Trump has proposed repealing the tax entirely. While Clinton, pushed by Bernie Sanders’ strong stance on the issue, had suggested lowering the threshold to $3.5m and increasing the rate to 65% for the super-wealthy. “It’s hard to think of a tax change that will have a more detrimental effect on inequality,” Garnder said. “There is no question that this will lead to a perpetual income elite – hardly the thing that Trump voters would have wanted. This will lead to a new era of dynastic wealth.” Dude..The Estate Tax is about 1 percent of federal revenue. We have almost half this country paying NO INCOME tax, worse, they are receiving FREE stuff. 10 percent of people need help, not 50. YOUR liberal LBJ policies from housing to education have produced south Chicago. An entire 3rd generation of children with no hope. I want TRUMP for them. I would argue that liberal policy is by far the most racist devisive policy a country could have. Shall we talk about approximately 25 percent of Americans work for the government? Thats ridiculous. Oh... Blow me...we won!! Oh..and giving the federal government money is like pissing into a wind turbine. The employees will receive their fat 50K to 150K pensions for life with full healthcare (not Obamacare, thats for the little people) and you the farmer, business owner will have NOTHING to show for it except an auditor when they find out you voted for a republican. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 25, 2016 10:04:45 GMT -5
Trump won. Don't wait for your prize. How many of your beloved clients you care so much about will benefit from the elimination of the estate tax? www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/trump-tax-plan-cuts-wealthy-low-income-inequality?CMP=fb_guTrump's tax plan: massive cuts for the 1% will usher 'era of dynastic wealth' More than eight million low-income and single-parent families will face sharp tax increases under Donald Trump exacerbating income inequality, experts warn
trump
Under Donald Trump’s proposed tax plan, the most wealthy Americans will recieve an average annual tax cut of $215,000 President Donald Trump is set to give America’s richest 1% an average annual tax cut of $214,000 when he takes office, while more than eight million families with children are expected to suffer financially under his proposed tax plan. On the eve of the election, Trump promised to “massively cut taxes for the middle class, the forgotten people, the forgotten men and women of this country, who built our country”. But independent expert analyses of Trump’s tax plan show that America’s millionaire and billionaire class will win big at the expense of struggling low- and middle-income people, who turned out in large numbers to help the real estate billionaire win the election. Experts warn that Trump’s tax plan will exacerbate America’s already chronic income inequality and herald in a “new era of dynastic wealth”. “The Trump tax plan is heavily, heavily, skewed to the most wealthy, who will receive huge savings,” said Lily Batchelder, a law professor and tax expert at New York University. “At the same time, millions of low-income families – particularly single-parent households – will face an increase.” Batchelder, who wrote an academic paper on Trump’s tax plan published by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said that the president-elect’s plan “significantly raises taxes” for at least 8.5 million families, with “especially large tax increases for working single parents”. More than 26m individuals live in those families. According to Batchelder’s research Trump’s tax changes – taken at their “most conservative” – could leave just over half of America’s nearly 11m single-parent households facing an increased tax burden. This figure rises to 61% – or 7m households – if the analysis is run on “reasonable assumptions” that the changes Trump has suggested go ahead. Single-parent families would suffer the most because Trump would lower the minimum of tax-free earnings to $15,000 per adult no matter how many children in the household. Under current law the threshold is $17,400 for single-parent families with one child and $24,750 for a couple with one child, and the threshold increases by $4,050 for each additional child. Trump also plans to consolidate the current seven tax breaks into three: 12%, 25% and 33%. His plan would scrap the current 10% tax for earnings under $19,625 and replace it with 12%. Trump’s proposed childcare credits would not make up for the changes, according to Batchelder. Minority families are set to suffer disproportionately from the tax increases, according to Batchelder. With 32% of African American families facing a tax increase compared with 19% of whites, this is mostly due to African American families being more likely to share the burden of childcare within the family and hence not benefit as much from Trump childcare credits. Batchelder said the effective tax increase for many millions of families would run into the thousands. While the poor will face tax increases, the Tax Policy Center research said the rich would received big tax cuts that get even bigger as you work up the income scale. The top 20% of earners would receive an average annual tax cut of $16,660 compared with an overall average cut of $2,940. The richest 1% will collect 47% of all the tax cuts – an average saving of $214,000. The 0.1% – the 117,000 households with incomes of more than $3.7m – would receive an average 2017 tax cut of $1.3m, a nearly 19% drop in tax they were due to pay in 2016. The tax savings of the super-rich will increase further in future, with the 0.1%’s estimated 2025 tax bill to fall by $1.5m. It is a stark contrast to Hillary Clinton’s tax plan, which would have seen taxes rises for the super-wealthy. Under her plan, the top 1% would pay an extra $163,000 a year more on average, and would have made up 93% of all new tax revenue by 2025. Clinton and Trump promised very different tax plans during the election. Composite: Justin Sullivan/ Mike Segar/Getty/Reuters “Listening to Trump’s rhetoric, most Americans probably don’t realise at all the impact of Trump’s tax plan,” Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) said. “Any way you slice it, the very best-off Americans will be the biggest beneficiaries. “If it looks bad now for middle-income families, those who turned out to vote for him, it’s only likely to get worse [with Trump as president]. It is very likely that they will end up poorer still. The most likely victims are middle- and low-income families.”Gardner said that under Trump, America will become even more divided between the rich and poor. “America is already very unequal, and his proposals would make income inequality a lot worse,” Gardner said. “This is obviously quite worrisome. If he rode to victory on a middle-income wave of support, those middle Americans will be very disappointed.” The inequality problem will be exacerbated by Trump’s plan to scrap inheritance tax – which he refers to as “the death tax”. The 40% inheritance tax is currently only charged on personal estate worth more than $5.45m and joint estates of $10.9m – sums so large that it only affects less than two in 1,000 Americans. Trump has proposed repealing the tax entirely. While Clinton, pushed by Bernie Sanders’ strong stance on the issue, had suggested lowering the threshold to $3.5m and increasing the rate to 65% for the super-wealthy. “It’s hard to think of a tax change that will have a more detrimental effect on inequality,” Garnder said. “There is no question that this will lead to a perpetual income elite – hardly the thing that Trump voters would have wanted. This will lead to a new era of dynastic wealth.” Dude..The Estate Tax is about 1 percent of federal revenue. We have almost half this country paying NO INCOME tax, worse, they are receiving FREE stuff. 10 percent of people need help, not 50. YOUR liberal LBJ policies from housing to education have produced south Chicago. An entire 3rd generation of children with no hope. I want TRUMP for them. I would argue that liberal policy is by far the most racist devisive policy a country could have. Shall we talk about approximately 25 percent of Americans work for the government? Thats ridiculous. Oh... Blow me...we won!! Oh..and giving the federal government money is like pissing into a wind turbine. The employees will receive their fat 50K to 150K pensions for life with full healthcare (not Obamacare, thats for the little people) and you the farmer, business owner will have NOTHING to show for it except an auditor when they find out you voted for a republican. Oh so 1% of the federal revenue isnt important at all, good to know. I'll use that in defense of the NEA. So no thoughts on the tax hike on the poor while the top 1% get a break? (Actually my wife is getting a night fat retirement check for life and we get free healthcare for life so thanks for that!) |
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Nov 25, 2016 10:15:51 GMT -5
Dude..The Estate Tax is about 1 percent of federal revenue. We have almost half this country paying NO INCOME tax, worse, they are receiving FREE stuff. 10 percent of people need help, not 50. YOUR liberal LBJ policies from housing to education have produced south Chicago. An entire 3rd generation of children with no hope. I want TRUMP for them. I would argue that liberal policy is by far the most racist devisive policy a country could have. Shall we talk about approximately 25 percent of Americans work for the government? Thats ridiculous. Oh... Blow me...we won!! Oh..and giving the federal government money is like pissing into a wind turbine. The employees will receive their fat 50K to 150K pensions for life with full healthcare (not Obamacare, thats for the little people) and you the farmer, business owner will have NOTHING to show for it except an auditor when they find out you voted for a republican. Oh so 1% of the federal revenue isnt important at all, good to know. I'll use that in defense of the NEA. So no thoughts on the tax hike on the poor while the top 1% get a break? (Actually my wife is getting a night fat retirement check for life and we get free healthcare for life so thanks for that!) It has to start somewhere so this a start. When 1 percent of Americans pay almost 44 percent of ALL income tax, of course any meaningful reform will affect them. I dont think the bottom pays enough so I am fine with this. EVERY American should pay income tax except say the bottom 10 percent. The NEA?? You mean the group in charge of our declining education system all while making sure teachers comp and lifetime benefits increase at the expense of the poor? That group? The Dept of Education, since inception has steer headed a decline in National standards. THAT sir..is government. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 25, 2016 15:52:17 GMT -5
Oh so 1% of the federal revenue isnt important at all, good to know. I'll use that in defense of the NEA. So no thoughts on the tax hike on the poor while the top 1% get a break? (Actually my wife is getting a night fat retirement check for life and we get free healthcare for life so thanks for that!) It has to start somewhere so this a start. When 1 percent of Americans pay almost 44 percent of ALL income tax, of course any meaningful reform will affect them. I dont think the bottom pays enough so I am fine with this. EVERY American should pay income tax except say the bottom 10 percent. The NEA?? You mean the group in charge of our declining education system all while making sure teachers comp and lifetime benefits increase at the expense of the poor? That group? The Dept of Education, since inception has steer headed a decline in National standards. THAT sir..is government. " I dont think the bottom pays enough so I am fine with this." Great, increasing tax burden on them should really help. And no silly. National Endowment for the Arts. |
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Nov 25, 2016 16:13:26 GMT -5
It has to start somewhere so this a start. When 1 percent of Americans pay almost 44 percent of ALL income tax, of course any meaningful reform will affect them. I dont think the bottom pays enough so I am fine with this. EVERY American should pay income tax except say the bottom 10 percent. The NEA?? You mean the group in charge of our declining education system all while making sure teachers comp and lifetime benefits increase at the expense of the poor? That group? The Dept of Education, since inception has steer headed a decline in National standards. THAT sir..is government. " I dont think the bottom pays enough so I am fine with this." Great, increasing tax burden on them should really help. And no silly. National Endowment for the Arts. Well.... the reality is YES, too many people in this country take and give very little. So... paying $500 a year in federal tax should be done by everyone except the bottom say 10 percent. How about, if you pay no federal tax for 3 years in a row you lose your right to vote? Joking of course but Americans should be proud to pay. NEA? I initially thought you meant National Association for the Arts but that was not part of our discussion. The reason we cant balance a budget is entitlements and labor costs. Labor costs. in the budget, neatly hide pensions and benefits. They dont break it out. So.. many people retiring as government workers at 55 , collecting a pension for 30 plus years having only worked say 25 to 30. A system that would bankrupt ANY company is bankrupting municipalities across the country and now affecting states. |
|
|
|
Post by chadp on Nov 26, 2016 15:39:33 GMT -5
If anything, at least he is consistent with his Lena Dunham obsession.. 😀 Not about Lena Dunham per se, it's the ugliness of most democrats. Just look at the Hillary supporters and see how gross they are. Everyone I know who voted for her is a 1-5 on the beauty scale (lots of feminazis and fat ugly college professors), while everyone I know who voted for trump is a 7, 8, 9 or 10. We beautiful people tend to reject Hilary's distorted vision of America. It's simply something I've noticed throughout the campaign - the disgusting ugliness of the left. Hotness won on Election Day and ugliness was was defeated! Actually I'm quite a handsome fellow..😜 |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Nov 26, 2016 16:06:42 GMT -5
Not about Lena Dunham per se, it's the ugliness of most democrats. Just look at the Hillary supporters and see how gross they are. Everyone I know who voted for her is a 1-5 on the beauty scale (lots of feminazis and fat ugly college professors), while everyone I know who voted for trump is a 7, 8, 9 or 10. We beautiful people tend to reject Hilary's distorted vision of America. It's simply something I've noticed throughout the campaign - the disgusting ugliness of the left. Hotness won on Election Day and ugliness was was defeated! Actually I'm quite a handsome fellow..😜 Then you are the 0.01 percent my non ugly dem friend. But even you gotta admit the ugliness of most of the left. Mad at America (Michael Moore/ Ff2/ fat short haired mean feminists) mad at the flag (Colin kapernick) for being so unattractive in a land of handsome dudes (me and Scott baio and even James Woods  ) and hot chix (the hot black girl from clueless). The media reports how every group voted (white, black, gay, etc.), I'm just reporting on how the beautiful (99.9% for trump) and disgustingly ugly people (99.9% for the witch) voted. You're welcome America. Not to mention Massachutes voted overwhelmingly for the witch and anyone who's ever been there knows how pasty and gross and overweight those ugly bastards are. Scary ugly. Like a horror movie. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 28, 2016 15:55:26 GMT -5
Blow me..we won. Trump won. Don't wait for your prize. How many of your beloved clients you care so much about will benefit from the elimination of the estate tax? www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/trump-tax-plan-cuts-wealthy-low-income-inequality?CMP=fb_guTrump's tax plan: massive cuts for the 1% will usher 'era of dynastic wealth' More than eight million low-income and single-parent families will face sharp tax increases under Donald Trump exacerbating income inequality, experts warn
trump
Under Donald Trump’s proposed tax plan, the most wealthy Americans will recieve an average annual tax cut of $215,000 President Donald Trump is set to give America’s richest 1% an average annual tax cut of $214,000 when he takes office, while more than eight million families with children are expected to suffer financially under his proposed tax plan. On the eve of the election, Trump promised to “massively cut taxes for the middle class, the forgotten people, the forgotten men and women of this country, who built our country”. But independent expert analyses of Trump’s tax plan show that America’s millionaire and billionaire class will win big at the expense of struggling low- and middle-income people, who turned out in large numbers to help the real estate billionaire win the election. Experts warn that Trump’s tax plan will exacerbate America’s already chronic income inequality and herald in a “new era of dynastic wealth”. “The Trump tax plan is heavily, heavily, skewed to the most wealthy, who will receive huge savings,” said Lily Batchelder, a law professor and tax expert at New York University. “At the same time, millions of low-income families – particularly single-parent households – will face an increase.” Batchelder, who wrote an academic paper on Trump’s tax plan published by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said that the president-elect’s plan “significantly raises taxes” for at least 8.5 million families, with “especially large tax increases for working single parents”. More than 26m individuals live in those families. According to Batchelder’s research Trump’s tax changes – taken at their “most conservative” – could leave just over half of America’s nearly 11m single-parent households facing an increased tax burden. This figure rises to 61% – or 7m households – if the analysis is run on “reasonable assumptions” that the changes Trump has suggested go ahead. Single-parent families would suffer the most because Trump would lower the minimum of tax-free earnings to $15,000 per adult no matter how many children in the household. Under current law the threshold is $17,400 for single-parent families with one child and $24,750 for a couple with one child, and the threshold increases by $4,050 for each additional child. Trump also plans to consolidate the current seven tax breaks into three: 12%, 25% and 33%. His plan would scrap the current 10% tax for earnings under $19,625 and replace it with 12%. Trump’s proposed childcare credits would not make up for the changes, according to Batchelder. Minority families are set to suffer disproportionately from the tax increases, according to Batchelder. With 32% of African American families facing a tax increase compared with 19% of whites, this is mostly due to African American families being more likely to share the burden of childcare within the family and hence not benefit as much from Trump childcare credits. Batchelder said the effective tax increase for many millions of families would run into the thousands. While the poor will face tax increases, the Tax Policy Center research said the rich would received big tax cuts that get even bigger as you work up the income scale. The top 20% of earners would receive an average annual tax cut of $16,660 compared with an overall average cut of $2,940. The richest 1% will collect 47% of all the tax cuts – an average saving of $214,000. The 0.1% – the 117,000 households with incomes of more than $3.7m – would receive an average 2017 tax cut of $1.3m, a nearly 19% drop in tax they were due to pay in 2016. The tax savings of the super-rich will increase further in future, with the 0.1%’s estimated 2025 tax bill to fall by $1.5m. It is a stark contrast to Hillary Clinton’s tax plan, which would have seen taxes rises for the super-wealthy. Under her plan, the top 1% would pay an extra $163,000 a year more on average, and would have made up 93% of all new tax revenue by 2025. Clinton and Trump promised very different tax plans during the election. Composite: Justin Sullivan/ Mike Segar/Getty/Reuters “Listening to Trump’s rhetoric, most Americans probably don’t realise at all the impact of Trump’s tax plan,” Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) said. “Any way you slice it, the very best-off Americans will be the biggest beneficiaries. “If it looks bad now for middle-income families, those who turned out to vote for him, it’s only likely to get worse [with Trump as president]. It is very likely that they will end up poorer still. The most likely victims are middle- and low-income families.”Gardner said that under Trump, America will become even more divided between the rich and poor. “America is already very unequal, and his proposals would make income inequality a lot worse,” Gardner said. “This is obviously quite worrisome. If he rode to victory on a middle-income wave of support, those middle Americans will be very disappointed.” The inequality problem will be exacerbated by Trump’s plan to scrap inheritance tax – which he refers to as “the death tax”. The 40% inheritance tax is currently only charged on personal estate worth more than $5.45m and joint estates of $10.9m – sums so large that it only affects less than two in 1,000 Americans. Trump has proposed repealing the tax entirely. While Clinton, pushed by Bernie Sanders’ strong stance on the issue, had suggested lowering the threshold to $3.5m and increasing the rate to 65% for the super-wealthy. “It’s hard to think of a tax change that will have a more detrimental effect on inequality,” Garnder said. “There is no question that this will lead to a perpetual income elite – hardly the thing that Trump voters would have wanted. This will lead to a new era of dynastic wealth.” Can we wait until President-Elect Trumps plan gets through Congressional negotiation before playing Chicken Little? Much of the above is still speculation. Granted the rich are getting "bigger" cuts. If that stimulates the economy in the big picture, Im fine with that. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:07:27 GMT -5
Can we wait until President-Elect Trumps plan gets through Congressional negotiation before playing Chicken Little? Much of the above is still speculation. Its based on his own published plan and I was told that because if the make up the the House and Senate, Trump will get "everything he wants" Ah yes, trickle down. We've been her before. Anyone care about the deficit anymore?  |
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 28, 2016 16:11:38 GMT -5
Can we wait until President-Elect Trumps plan gets through Congressional negotiation before playing Chicken Little? Much of the above is still speculation. Its based on his own published plan and I was told that because if the make up the the House and Senate, Trump will get "everything he wants" Ah yes, trickle down. We've been her before. Anyone care about the deficit anymore? Obama ran it up more than all President's combined... so shut the fuck up. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:15:15 GMT -5
Its based on his own published plan and I was told that because if the make up the the House and Senate, Trump will get "everything he wants" Ah yes, trickle down. We've been her before. Anyone care about the deficit anymore? Obama ran it up more than all President's combined... so shut the fuck up. Thats what happens when you inherit the Great Recession. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 28, 2016 18:00:06 GMT -5
Obama ran it up more than all President's combined... so shut the fuck up. Thats what happens when you inherit the Great Recession. Did you type that with a straight face? |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 18:16:23 GMT -5
Thats what happens when you inherit the Great Recession. Did you type that with a straight face? Not really. |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Dec 1, 2016 14:19:39 GMT -5
this is going to sound like i should have posted this several years ago, but I"m addicted to black pussy.
i feel so much better.
|
|
