|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Dec 14, 2016 9:14:16 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas
sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won
At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism.
Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite.
What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal.
It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win
|
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Dec 14, 2016 9:21:10 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win shouldn't you be making us sandwiches? |
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Dec 14, 2016 9:33:26 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Lol. How about people just hated that cunt Hillary. Wait, is that misogynist? _ |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 14, 2016 9:36:27 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Did they account for Hillary's hostility toward all of the women her husband cheated on her with/raped? If you do then only about 1% of the population, those that voted green/libertarian can claim they didn't use that criteria in their choice. The more democrats blame things like this and think their message is still on point rather than realize that Hillary didn't stump in the right places or hard enough, didn't try to connect with the middle of America, favors anti-American trade deals, is not a likable person, etc then they will continue to lose. |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Dec 14, 2016 10:15:52 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Maybe we need to enact Sharia law. You know, to protect women's rights. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2016 10:19:42 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Arm women, not bears. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Dec 14, 2016 10:27:26 GMT -5
Make America Great Again. Hope they bring Norm back for the Correspondents Dinner.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Dec 14, 2016 10:33:39 GMT -5
Make SNL Great Again
|
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Dec 14, 2016 10:56:56 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Maybe we need to enact Sharia law. You know, to protect women's rights. The republicans are working on it. Just made it through Ohio. And when Trump appoints justices who will undo Roe v Wade the return to the middle ages will be complete. Even though conservatives HYPOCRITICALLY SCREAMED their lungs out that judges shouldn't legislate from the bench. But its ok for a republican president to announce he's going to get judges to legislate from the bench. If it suits their agenda it's fin . NEVER was there supposed to be a litmus test for judges. Republicans want to leave government out of people's lives. Except when it comes to women's vaginas and uteruses the old white guys have to have their say about that ..All sharia means is law by religion - no different than the fanatical christianists. So you thought your comment was funny? |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Dec 14, 2016 11:01:59 GMT -5
Take a bow fellas sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won At the same time, the role of hostility toward women hasn’t been discussed nearly enough. The more “hostile sexist” attitudes voters held, according to research by political scientists Carly Wayne, Nicholas Valentino, and Marzia Oceno, the more likely they were to vote for Trump. Hostility to women predicted voters’ support for Trump just as strongly as racial resentment, and even more strongly than affinity for authoritarianism. Does this mean that almost half of Americans hate women? Not quite. What it does mean is something both subtler and more disturbing. It means that our society only values women under certain narrow conditions. It means that for many voters, Trump’s toxic masculinity was a deep part of his appeal. It means that misogyny is alive and well in the United States, and that it probably helped Trump win Feminazi lies. This "study" was probably done at by some liberal college's BS gender studies class. Completely meaningless nonsense (just like a degree in that major). |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 14, 2016 11:08:04 GMT -5
Maybe we need to enact Sharia law. You know, to protect women's rights. The republicans are working on it. Just made it through Ohio. And when Trump appoints justices who will undo Roe v Wade the return to the middle ages will be complete. Even though conservatives HYPOCRITICALLY SCREAMED their lungs out that judges shouldn't legislate from the bench. But its ok for a republican president to announce he's going to get judges to legislate from the bench. If it suits their agenda it's fin . NEVER was there supposed to be a litmus test for judges. Republicans want to leave government out of people's lives. Except when it comes to women's vaginas and uteruses the old white guys have to have their say about that ..All sharia means is law by religion - no different than the fanatical christianists. So you thought your comment was funny? You are equating a "religious law" that justifies honor killings, clitorectomies, not letting women drive, killing gays, etc with appointing Justices with adherence to constitutional law? I am pretty sure the Ohio law and what Trump has proposed is a ban on late term abortions. I don't think he has said anything about an abortion ban or returning to the middle ages which I might add is exactly where countries that abide by Sharia are. |
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Dec 14, 2016 11:09:02 GMT -5
The republicans are working on it. Just made it through Ohio. And when Trump appoints justices who will undo Roe v Wade the return to the middle ages will be complete. Even though conservatives HYPOCRITICALLY SCREAMED their lungs out that judges shouldn't legislate from the bench. But its ok for a republican president to announce he's going to get judges to legislate from the bench. If it suits their agenda it's fin . NEVER was there supposed to be a litmus test for judges. Republicans want to leave government out of people's lives. Except when it comes to women's vaginas and uteruses the old white guys have to have their say about that ..All sharia means is law by religion - no different than the fanatical christianists. So you thought your comment was funny? You are equating a "religious law" that justifies honor killings, clitorectomies, not letting women drive, killing gays, etc with appointing Justices with adherence to constitutional law? I am pretty sure the Ohio law and what Trump has proposed is a ban on late term abortions. I don't think he has said anything about an abortion ban or returning to the middle ages which I might add is exactly where countries that abide by Sharia are. Shouldn't you stop reading and replying to useless posts? |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 14, 2016 11:09:59 GMT -5
You are equating a "religious law" that justifies honor killings, clitorectomies, not letting women drive, killing gays, etc with appointing Justices with adherence to constitutional law? I am pretty sure the Ohio law and what Trump has proposed is a ban on late term abortions. I don't think he has said anything about an abortion ban or returning to the middle ages which I might add is exactly where countries that abide by Sharia are. Shouldn't you stop reading and replying to useless posts? No I enjoy it. You post I replied to wasn't useless, just wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Jan 6, 2017 11:45:21 GMT -5
Just reported that Jill Stein pocketed $2 million from the recount efforts.
LOL
Anyone still think she was doing this for the "integrity of democracy"?
|
|
