|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 28, 2016 15:21:30 GMT -5
Prayers for OSU ![:(](http://i.imgur.com/aGYcv7L.gif) Somali refugee you say? The Church World Service Center wants to settle refugees from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan in Poughkeepsie. Not a fan of that one bit.
|
|
|
Post by Chesapeakejet on Nov 28, 2016 15:48:01 GMT -5
What about your daily everyday garden variety "less than" mass shootings!??!
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:03:05 GMT -5
What about your daily everyday garden variety "less than" mass shootings!??! Somalis still waaaaay behind.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 28, 2016 16:14:52 GMT -5
Not denying that there are more white "mass" shooters in the US since 1982, but thats a simplistic view. Non Hispanic whites are 63% of the population. Based on that chart, they committed 58% of "mass shootings" since 1982. Blacks are 12% of the population, yet committed 17% of the mass shootings per that chart. The numbers track pretty close to demographics. Sure, there have been many more white "mass" shooters... theres also a whole lot more white people in general. Id be interested in seeing the numbers a little less far back - 1982 was a largely different environment than. Unfortunately this one (which wouldnt register since it wasnt a shooting?), Orlando, San Bernadino, Fort Hood... Middle Eastern/African/Muslims are closing the gap ![:(](http://i.imgur.com/aGYcv7L.gif) As an aside, I assume folks of Middle Eastern descent are considered Other in that chart? Rather PC Id suggest.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Nov 28, 2016 16:16:43 GMT -5
What about your daily everyday garden variety "less than" mass shootings!??! Somalis still waaaaay behind. So all whites are lumped together, but Somalis get their own category? Peachy ![:)](//storage.forums.net/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Nov 28, 2016 16:16:57 GMT -5
What about your daily everyday garden variety "less than" mass shootings!??! Somalis still waaaaay behind. Boy are you're dense. You're the worst type of braindead, brainwashed lib. Where do you teach again? Hampshire College, right? Figures.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:18:33 GMT -5
Not denying that there are more white "mass" shooters in the US since 1982, but thats a simplistic view. Non Hispanic whites are 63% of the population. Based on that chart, they committed 58% of "mass shootings" since 1982. Blacks are 12% of the population, yet committed 17% of the mass shootings per that chart. The numbers track pretty close to demographics. Sure, there have been many more white "mass" shooters... theres also a whole lot more white people in general. Id be interested in seeing the numbers a little less far back - 1982 was a largely different environment than. Unfortunately this one (which wouldnt register since it wasnt a shooting?), Orlando, San Bernadino, Fort Hood... Middle Eastern/African/Muslims are closing the gap As an aside, I assume folks of Middle Eastern descent are considered Other in that chart? Rather PC Id suggest. I think they are other because the amount is so small. Missing the point anyways. I brought it up because someone was "predicting" who did the Ohio deed. I'm simply saying, if you are a betting man, put it all on "mentally ill" white dude.
|
|
|
Post by Mond the Bagnificient on Nov 28, 2016 16:19:28 GMT -5
Not denying that there are more white "mass" shooters in the US since 1982, but thats a simplistic view. Non Hispanic whites are 63% of the population. Based on that chart, they committed 58% of "mass shootings" since 1982. Blacks are 12% of the population, yet committed 17% of the mass shootings per that chart. The numbers track pretty close to demographics. Sure, there have been many more white "mass" shooters... theres also a whole lot more white people in general. Id be interested in seeing the numbers a little less far back - 1982 was a largely different environment than. Unfortunately this one (which wouldnt register since it wasnt a shooting?), Orlando, San Bernadino, Fort Hood... Middle Eastern/African/Muslims are closing the gap As an aside, I assume folks of Middle Eastern descent are considered Other in that chart? Rather PC Id suggest. I think they are other because the amount is so small. Missing the point anyways. I brought it up because someone was "predicting" who did the Ohio deed. I'm simply saying, if you are a betting man, put it all on "mentally ill" white dude. That's like betting on the 49ers or Cowboys to be in the Superbowl... great bet 15 years ago. Not anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:19:48 GMT -5
Somalis still waaaaay behind. So all whites are lumped together, but Somalis get their own category? Peachy That's what we in the business call a "joke." How you gonna separate white anyway? Italians? Jews? Jets fans?
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:20:31 GMT -5
I think they are other because the amount is so small. Missing the point anyways. I brought it up because someone was "predicting" who did the Ohio deed. I'm simply saying, if you are a betting man, put it all on "mentally ill" white dude. That's like betting on the 49ers or Cowboys to be in the Superbowl... great bet 15 years ago. Not anymore. Really, a great bet 15 years ago?. Cowboys were 5-11. The Patriots won the SuperBowl 15 years ago. COMMON.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Nov 28, 2016 16:48:39 GMT -5
That's like betting on the 49ers or Cowboys to be in the Superbowl... great bet 15 years ago. Not anymore. Really, a great bet 15 years ago?. Cowboys were 5-11. The Patriots won the SuperBowl 15 years ago. COMMON. That was the one where the Cheatriots spied on the Rams walk through the day before the game and knew all the Rams plays. And Goodell burned all the tapes. After fining the Pats and Belli and docking them a first round pick. Actually, it's a pretty good bet if you know all your opponents plays that you're going to win. profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/30/marshall-faulk-patriots-cheated-the-rams-out-of-a-super-bowl/Marshall Faulk: Patriots cheated the Rams out of a Super BowlPosted by Michael David Smith on January 30, 2013, 10:02 AM EST Belidickmartz Getty Images It’s been 11 years since the Rams lost to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI, but former Rams running back Marshall Faulk isn’t over it, because Faulk believes the Patriots cheated to win. Although NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has insisted that there’s no evidence that the Patriots spied on the Rams’ walk-through practice the day before the game, Faulk still thinks they did. “I’ll never be over being cheated out of the Super Bowl,” Faulk told Tom Curran of CSNNE.com. The NFL fined the Patriots and head coach Bill Belidick, and stripped the Patriots of a first-round draft pick, for taping opposing coaches’ signals in violation of NFL rules. But the separate allegation that the Patriots taped the Rams’ walk-through before the Super Bowl was never substantiated. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the league destroyed all the tapes that were confiscated in the investigation of the Patriots’ taping practices, and Faulk is skeptical that the whole truth will ever come out. “Obviously, the commissioner gets to handle things how he wants to handle them but if they wanted us to shut up about what happened, show us the tapes. Don’t burn ’em,” Faulk said. Faulk says the Rams installed new plays for the game against the Patriots, and that the Patriots seemed to be so perfectly prepared for them that Faulk believes they must have used espionage. “I understand Bill is a great coach,” Faulk said. “But No. 13 [Kurt Warner] will tell you. Mike Martz will tell you. We had some plays in the red zone that we hadn’t ran. . . . And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . And they created a check for it. It’s just little things like that. It’s either the best coaching in the world when you come up with situations that you had never seen before. Or you’d seen it and knew what to do.” Faulk seems to believe Belidick and the Patriots got off easy for Spygate. “Am I bitter about how the league handled them taping people? If Bountygate was that bad and Sean got suspended for a whole year? If we want to talk about some unfair assessment of how we’re assessing things? Man. If you lost a game and your brother cheated you, you’ll remember that.” And 11 years later, Faulk still remembers a Super Bowl that he believes the Patriots stole. _
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 16:52:00 GMT -5
Really, a great bet 15 years ago?. Cowboys were 5-11. The Patriots won the SuperBowl 15 years ago. COMMON. That was the one where the Cheatriots spied on the Rams walk through the day before the game and knew all the Rams plays. And Goodell burned all the tapes. After fining the Pats and Belli and docking them a first round pick. Actually, it's a pretty good bet if you know all your opponents plays that you're going to win. profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/30/marshall-faulk-patriots-cheated-the-rams-out-of-a-super-bowl/Marshall Faulk: Patriots cheated the Rams out of a Super BowlPosted by Michael David Smith on January 30, 2013, 10:02 AM EST Belidickmartz Getty Images It’s been 11 years since the Rams lost to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI, but former Rams running back Marshall Faulk isn’t over it, because Faulk believes the Patriots cheated to win. Although NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has insisted that there’s no evidence that the Patriots spied on the Rams’ walk-through practice the day before the game, Faulk still thinks they did. “I’ll never be over being cheated out of the Super Bowl,” Faulk told Tom Curran of CSNNE.com. The NFL fined the Patriots and head coach Bill Belidick, and stripped the Patriots of a first-round draft pick, for taping opposing coaches’ signals in violation of NFL rules. But the separate allegation that the Patriots taped the Rams’ walk-through before the Super Bowl was never substantiated. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the league destroyed all the tapes that were confiscated in the investigation of the Patriots’ taping practices, and Faulk is skeptical that the whole truth will ever come out. “Obviously, the commissioner gets to handle things how he wants to handle them but if they wanted us to shut up about what happened, show us the tapes. Don’t burn ’em,” Faulk said. Faulk says the Rams installed new plays for the game against the Patriots, and that the Patriots seemed to be so perfectly prepared for them that Faulk believes they must have used espionage. “I understand Bill is a great coach,” Faulk said. “But No. 13 [Kurt Warner] will tell you. Mike Martz will tell you. We had some plays in the red zone that we hadn’t ran. . . . And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . And they created a check for it. It’s just little things like that. It’s either the best coaching in the world when you come up with situations that you had never seen before. Or you’d seen it and knew what to do.” Faulk seems to believe Belidick and the Patriots got off easy for Spygate. “Am I bitter about how the league handled them taping people? If Bountygate was that bad and Sean got suspended for a whole year? If we want to talk about some unfair assessment of how we’re assessing things? Man. If you lost a game and your brother cheated you, you’ll remember that.” And 11 years later, Faulk still remembers a Super Bowl that he believes the Patriots stole. _ Awwwwwww...Marshall Faulk's bitter tears are my champagne of life. He cries more than libtard Clintonites! And I won big on my SB bet that year!
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Nov 28, 2016 17:30:27 GMT -5
That was the one where the Cheatriots spied on the Rams walk through the day before the game and knew all the Rams plays. And Goodell burned all the tapes. After fining the Pats and Belli and docking them a first round pick. Actually, it's a pretty good bet if you know all your opponents plays that you're going to win. profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/30/marshall-faulk-patriots-cheated-the-rams-out-of-a-super-bowl/Marshall Faulk: Patriots cheated the Rams out of a Super BowlPosted by Michael David Smith on January 30, 2013, 10:02 AM EST Belidickmartz Getty Images It’s been 11 years since the Rams lost to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI, but former Rams running back Marshall Faulk isn’t over it, because Faulk believes the Patriots cheated to win. Although NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has insisted that there’s no evidence that the Patriots spied on the Rams’ walk-through practice the day before the game, Faulk still thinks they did. “I’ll never be over being cheated out of the Super Bowl,” Faulk told Tom Curran of CSNNE.com. The NFL fined the Patriots and head coach Bill Belidick, and stripped the Patriots of a first-round draft pick, for taping opposing coaches’ signals in violation of NFL rules. But the separate allegation that the Patriots taped the Rams’ walk-through before the Super Bowl was never substantiated. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the league destroyed all the tapes that were confiscated in the investigation of the Patriots’ taping practices, and Faulk is skeptical that the whole truth will ever come out. “Obviously, the commissioner gets to handle things how he wants to handle them but if they wanted us to shut up about what happened, show us the tapes. Don’t burn ’em,” Faulk said. Faulk says the Rams installed new plays for the game against the Patriots, and that the Patriots seemed to be so perfectly prepared for them that Faulk believes they must have used espionage. “I understand Bill is a great coach,” Faulk said. “But No. 13 [Kurt Warner] will tell you. Mike Martz will tell you. We had some plays in the red zone that we hadn’t ran. . . . And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . And they created a check for it. It’s just little things like that. It’s either the best coaching in the world when you come up with situations that you had never seen before. Or you’d seen it and knew what to do.” Faulk seems to believe Belidick and the Patriots got off easy for Spygate. “Am I bitter about how the league handled them taping people? If Bountygate was that bad and Sean got suspended for a whole year? If we want to talk about some unfair assessment of how we’re assessing things? Man. If you lost a game and your brother cheated you, you’ll remember that.” And 11 years later, Faulk still remembers a Super Bowl that he believes the Patriots stole. _ Awwwwwww...Marshall Faulk's bitter tears are my champagne of life. He cries more than libtard Clintonites! And I won big on my SB bet that year! I think Libitard Clintonites tears are so delicious because Hillary lost fair and square--she did herself in. Faulks and every other fans tears outside of New England are rightfully bitter because of...well...cheating fucks. And the coverup. _
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Nov 28, 2016 18:18:00 GMT -5
Awwwwwww...Marshall Faulk's bitter tears are my champagne of life. He cries more than libtard Clintonites! And I won big on my SB bet that year! I think Libitard Clintonites tears are so delicious because Hillary lost fair and square--she did herself in. Faulks and every other fans tears outside of New England are rightfully bitter because of...well...cheating fucks. And the coverup. _ He's not even the best Faulk.
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Nov 28, 2016 18:18:37 GMT -5
Not denying that there are more white "mass" shooters in the US since 1982, but thats a simplistic view. Non Hispanic whites are 63% of the population. Based on that chart, they committed 58% of "mass shootings" since 1982. Blacks are 12% of the population, yet committed 17% of the mass shootings per that chart. The numbers track pretty close to demographics. Sure, there have been many more white "mass" shooters... theres also a whole lot more white people in general. Id be interested in seeing the numbers a little less far back - 1982 was a largely different environment than. Unfortunately this one (which wouldnt register since it wasnt a shooting?), Orlando, San Bernadino, Fort Hood... Middle Eastern/African/Muslims are closing the gap As an aside, I assume folks of Middle Eastern descent are considered Other in that chart? Rather PC Id suggest. I think they are other because the amount is so small. Missing the point anyways. I brought it up because someone was "predicting" who did the Ohio deed. I'm simply saying, if you are a betting man, put it all on "mentally ill" white dude. You would lose that bet handily. (I already knew who was involved from reading facts from non-US media, a Muslim Somali who whined about prayer rooms) BLM and Islamocultists have been using America and Europe as a shooting gallery cutting board and bombing field in this, B. Hussein's walk year. Black violence of all means towards their own race and others outstrips the white race you despise that outnumbers it roughly 4 to 1 year after year. 30,000 Muslim attacks worldwide since 9\11, including several shootings in the US this year that outdo your one Caucasian poster boy from 2015. Etc.
|
|