|
Post by Trades on Jan 26, 2017 9:22:34 GMT -5
The Washington Post has a problem with him looking into making sure our elections are run cleanly? I am not sure what the complaint even is. IF he was doing this to steal the White House then it would be a problem. If he is having a true investigation that can end the questions one way or the other and then as he said do something if something is found then I think that is a great thing. Why is this even an issue? Are they afraid of what he will find? Recounts were suspended in MI due to obvious irregularities. NY and CA alone between them had millions of illegal votes, por supuesto. Knowing the sloth\corruption in just CMS, the SSA and IRS where ilegales from all the beknighted corners of the world slop like greedy gravy sucking pigs at the publicly funded troughs and all the ways fraud can be perpetrated why would anyone, on any side of the aisle begin to doubt voter fraud? Wanting everything to be on the up-and-up is not a sin, its a virtue. In the computer age its no big deal to verify anyone's veracity, concerns about "rights", privacy and intrusion need to be reconciled with fairness - fairness to real, live US citizens who pay taxes and want honest elections to ensure their representation is also fair. Take computers out of the mix. How about the idea of sticking your finger in a pot of dye that shows you voted? How about a real voter ID program that you can only get if you are a citizen? Then if you want to add in secure technology to solve the problems of wrong pens, hanging chads, wrinkled papers, bad scanners, etc I am all for it. Just like the wall it is one step towards fixing a problem rather than thinking it can all be fixed with one solution.
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Jan 26, 2017 9:26:42 GMT -5
Recounts were suspended in MI due to obvious irregularities. NY and CA alone between them had millions of illegal votes, por supuesto. Knowing the sloth\corruption in just CMS, the SSA and IRS where ilegales from all the beknighted corners of the world slop like greedy gravy sucking pigs at the publicly funded troughs and all the ways fraud can be perpetrated why would anyone, on any side of the aisle begin to doubt voter fraud? Wanting everything to be on the up-and-up is not a sin, its a virtue. In the computer age its no big deal to verify anyone's veracity, concerns about "rights", privacy and intrusion need to be reconciled with fairness - fairness to real, live US citizens who pay taxes and want honest elections to ensure their representation is also fair. Take computers out of the mix. How about the idea of sticking your finger in a pot of dye that shows you voted? How about a real voter ID program that you can only get if you are a citizen? Then if you want to add in secure technology to solve the problems of wrong pens, hanging chads, wrinkled papers, bad scanners, etc I am all for it. Just like the wall it is one step towards fixing a problem rather than thinking it can all be fixed with one solution. India and Canada have voter ID, so can we
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jan 26, 2017 9:28:04 GMT -5
Take computers out of the mix. How about the idea of sticking your finger in a pot of dye that shows you voted? How about a real voter ID program that you can only get if you are a citizen? Then if you want to add in secure technology to solve the problems of wrong pens, hanging chads, wrinkled papers, bad scanners, etc I am all for it. Just like the wall it is one step towards fixing a problem rather than thinking it can all be fixed with one solution. India and Canada have voter ID, so can we That's racist!!!
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Jan 26, 2017 9:31:04 GMT -5
I thought executive orders were bad?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jan 26, 2017 9:36:14 GMT -5
I thought executive orders were bad? Not when they are undoing old executive orders. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 26, 2017 10:12:43 GMT -5
I thought executive orders were bad?
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 26, 2017 11:46:56 GMT -5
India and Canada have voter ID, so can we That's racist!!! I'd still sign up.
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 28, 2017 0:23:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jan 28, 2017 12:12:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jan 30, 2017 16:48:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 30, 2017 18:35:56 GMT -5
I heard Trump will elect a new Supreme Court judge tomorrow to replace the one who(not coincidentally) was picked by Obama.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jan 30, 2017 18:41:29 GMT -5
I heard Trump will elect a new Supreme Court judge tomorrow to replace the one who(not coincidentally) was picked by Obama. He's going to nominate someone they still have to be approved. You think the left was screaming before wait until Trump throws up someone that is pro life. They are gonna hear the crying in Europe LOl.
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 30, 2017 18:57:23 GMT -5
Eh. I'm more pro-choice but whatever. So long as that Judge is Pro-Trump(which would annoy the "Left" immensely), I'm cool with it. hahaha!
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 30, 2017 23:48:05 GMT -5
Trump just fired the Attorney General!!! Trump to Attorney General
|
|
|
Post by Touchable on Feb 1, 2017 12:07:50 GMT -5
|
|