|
|
Post by 2foolish on Feb 2, 2017 13:51:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Feb 2, 2017 13:51:34 GMT -5
So what does drumpf do to these people practicing their right to free speech? Threatens to take away their schools federal funding. Looks like both sides may be afraid of free speech. Rioting and preventing someone else's free speech isn't free speech you dumb shit. Let CA and alums fund the sociopathy themselves. yeah, gotta agree here with flushing. burning buildings aint free speech |
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Feb 2, 2017 13:51:46 GMT -5
nothing terrifies the liberal left more than free speech So what does drumpf do to these people practicing their right to free speech? Threatens to take away their schools federal funding. Looks like both sides may be afraid of free speech. free speech does not include sneaking up on a girl and macing her in the face, setting fires, smashing windows, throwing molotov cocktails and rocks and bottles at police, and assaulting people all of which was done by liberals at berkeley last night to protest a speech that hadn't happened yet, but that they knew would present ideas and positions that they didn't agree with can you grasp the difference, or should i dig out the crayolas? |
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Feb 2, 2017 13:53:57 GMT -5
Rioting and preventing someone else's free speech isn't free speech you dumb shit. Let CA and alums fund the sociopathy themselves. No excuse for the rioting and the destruction of property, but protesting is a form of free speech, you dumb shit. no one is arguing they don't have free speech...who says they don't?,( you piece of shit,just trying to keep up with u guys..lol) |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Feb 2, 2017 14:04:50 GMT -5
Rioting and preventing someone else's free speech isn't free speech you dumb shit. Let CA and alums fund the sociopathy themselves. No excuse for the rioting and the destruction of property, but protesting is a form of free speech, you dumb shit. Justice Frank Murphy, 1942. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire Peaceful protest is your right. Incitement, or actual violence, is not. What happened there looked pretty darn violent. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 2, 2017 14:10:44 GMT -5
So what does drumpf do to these people practicing their right to free speech? Threatens to take away their schools federal funding. Looks like both sides may be afraid of free speech. free speech does not include sneaking up on a girl and macing her in the face, setting fires, smashing windows, throwing molotov cocktails and rocks and bottles at police, and assaulting people all of which was done by liberals at berkeley last night to protest a speech that hadn't happened yet, but that they knew would present ideas and positions that they didn't agree with can you grasp the difference, or should i dig out the crayolas? So you're going to threaten to take away funding from 40,000 kids because of what some idiots did on one night? I get where the puppet is coming from because the protest may have hurt his puppeteer's feelings, but you don't think that's an abuse of power if he were to actually go through with it? Again, I'm not defending the kids that were rioting. Anyone caught destroying anything or trying to throw things at the police should be arrested and thrown out of school, but not everyone at the school was doing that and not everyone at the protest was being violent. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Feb 2, 2017 14:11:45 GMT -5
Actually, even the ACLU states that:
So if non-violent civil disobedience isnt protected, then what happened there certainly wouldnt be, no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 2, 2017 14:16:49 GMT -5
free speech does not include sneaking up on a girl and macing her in the face, setting fires, smashing windows, throwing molotov cocktails and rocks and bottles at police, and assaulting people all of which was done by liberals at berkeley last night to protest a speech that hadn't happened yet, but that they knew would present ideas and positions that they didn't agree with can you grasp the difference, or should i dig out the crayolas? So you're going to threaten to take away funding from 40,000 kids because of what some idiots did on one night? I get where the puppet is coming from because the protest may have hurt his puppeteer's feelings, but you don't think that's an abuse of power if he were to actually go through with it? Again, I'm not defending the kids that were rioting. Anyone caught destroying anything or trying to throw things at the police should be arrested and thrown out of school, but not everyone at the school was doing that and not everyone at the protest was being violent. Wake up man, these places are nothing more than indoctrination factories. fucking zombies of the new nazi regime. These fucking morons better go the fuck home and pipe down or they will start filling up Hitlary's Fema camps. |
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Feb 2, 2017 14:19:57 GMT -5
free speech does not include sneaking up on a girl and macing her in the face, setting fires, smashing windows, throwing molotov cocktails and rocks and bottles at police, and assaulting people all of which was done by liberals at berkeley last night to protest a speech that hadn't happened yet, but that they knew would present ideas and positions that they didn't agree with can you grasp the difference, or should i dig out the crayolas? So you're going to threaten to take away funding from 40,000 kids because of what some idiots did on one night? I get where the puppet is coming from because the protest may have hurt his puppeteer's feelings, but you don't think that's an abuse of power if he were to actually go through with it? Again, I'm not defending the kids that were rioting. Anyone caught destroying anything or trying to throw things at the police should be arrested and thrown out of school, but not everyone at the school was doing that and not everyone at the protest was being violent. These schools are doing very little to stop this and in a tacit way promote it. Yes.. warn the school and then cut off their funding for not enforcing federal law. |
|
|
|
Post by flushingjet on Feb 2, 2017 14:27:37 GMT -5
Rioting and preventing someone else's free speech isn't free speech you dumb shit. Let CA and alums fund the sociopathy themselves. No excuse for the rioting and the destruction of property, but protesting is a form of free speech, you dumb shit. Not in an unlawful way you dumber shit. Now go bang your head off a prayer rug SAR sg3 or whatever moronic untermenschen you were at JI |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 2, 2017 14:40:45 GMT -5
No excuse for the rioting and the destruction of property, but protesting is a form of free speech, you dumb shit. Not in an unlawful way you dumber shit. Now go bang your head off a prayer rug SAR sg3 or whatever moronic untermenschen you were at JI You really are obsessed with who i used to be at JI, you dumbest shit. For about the 4th or 5th time now, I was the same name there as I am here. Been here, using this name, since ragu started this place. Now go suffocate yourself in white sheets. |
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Feb 2, 2017 14:42:55 GMT -5
Not in an unlawful way you dumber shit. Now go bang your head off a prayer rug SAR sg3 or whatever moronic untermenschen you were at JI You really are obsessed with who i used to be at JI, you dumbest shit. For about the 4th or 5th time now, I was the same name there as I am here. Been here, using this name, since ragu started this place. Now go suffocate yourself in white sheets.lol... |
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Feb 2, 2017 14:44:00 GMT -5
free speech does not include sneaking up on a girl and macing her in the face, setting fires, smashing windows, throwing molotov cocktails and rocks and bottles at police, and assaulting people all of which was done by liberals at berkeley last night to protest a speech that hadn't happened yet, but that they knew would present ideas and positions that they didn't agree with can you grasp the difference, or should i dig out the crayolas? I get where the puppet is coming from because the protest may have hurt his puppeteer's feelings, but you don't think that's an abuse of power if he were to actually go through with it? Again, I'm not defending the kids that were rioting. Anyone caught destroying anything or trying to throw things at the police should be arrested and thrown out of school, but not everyone at the school was doing that and not everyone at the protest was being violent. yes hold the people that are responsible...the school... |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 2, 2017 14:44:55 GMT -5
So you're going to threaten to take away funding from 40,000 kids because of what some idiots did on one night? I get where the puppet is coming from because the protest may have hurt his puppeteer's feelings, but you don't think that's an abuse of power if he were to actually go through with it? Again, I'm not defending the kids that were rioting. Anyone caught destroying anything or trying to throw things at the police should be arrested and thrown out of school, but not everyone at the school was doing that and not everyone at the protest was being violent. yes hold the people that are responsible...the school... Holding a school responsible for a few violent idiots is like holding a gun company responsible for a few violent idiots. You really think that's the best route? |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Feb 2, 2017 14:45:45 GMT -5
Leftists always talking about how the founding fathers didnt know we would have AR-15s when they wrote the 2nd Amendment. They also didnt know we would have opportunists who fund anarchy like George Soros. Maybe its time to revisit the 1st Amendment.
|
|
