|
Post by Big L on Mar 20, 2017 16:30:51 GMT -5
routine monitoring of Russian operatives.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 20, 2017 16:36:43 GMT -5
routine monitoring of Russian operatives. So We listen to Russians. Trump's people talking to Russians. Trump's people working out of Trump Tower. And we know Flynn was recorded talking to a Russian diplomat. But Trump Tower was not tapped or under surveillance.
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Mar 20, 2017 17:55:21 GMT -5
routine monitoring of Russian operatives. So We listen to Russians. Trump's people talking to Russians. Trump's people working out of Trump Tower. And we know Flynn was recorded talking to a Russian diplomat. But Trump Tower was not tapped or under surveillance. were there Russians there? Then I suppose it's entirely possible trump tower was not under surveillance.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 20, 2017 18:24:28 GMT -5
So We listen to Russians. Trump's people talking to Russians. Trump's people working out of Trump Tower. And we know Flynn was recorded talking to a Russian diplomat. But Trump Tower was not tapped or under surveillance. were there Russians there? Then I suppose it's entirely possible trump tower was not under surveillance. Anything is possible so I dont like to use that as a standard for making an argument. But I feel like the dots I laid out are a lot easier to connect than the ones being laid out by congressional democrats and their friends in the media. But to answer your question, one is not required to be in a specific physical location for us to spy on them.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Mar 20, 2017 19:36:50 GMT -5
were there Russians there? Then I suppose it's entirely possible trump tower was not under surveillance. Anything is possible so I dont like to use that as a standard for making an argument. But I feel like the dots I laid out are a lot easier to connect than the ones being laid out by congressional democrats and their friends in the media. But to answer your question, one is not required to be in a specific physical location for us to spy on them. Unless you're a liberal cuck. Then your wife has to be in the bedroom getting fucked by the mailman as you spy from the closet.
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Mar 20, 2017 20:32:23 GMT -5
were there Russians there? Then I suppose it's entirely possible trump tower was not under surveillance. Anything is possible so I dont like to use that as a standard for making an argument. But I feel like the dots I laid out are a lot easier to connect than the ones being laid out by congressional democrats and their friends in the media. But to answer your question, one is not required to be in a specific physical location for us to spy on them. right-o. So if we're spying on Russian operatives in Moscow, and they get a call from Flynn, then dot connecting is fairly simple. Additionally, it isn't democrats saying trump tower was not under surveillance, its bipartisan across the board.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 21, 2017 5:28:17 GMT -5
Anything is possible so I dont like to use that as a standard for making an argument. But I feel like the dots I laid out are a lot easier to connect than the ones being laid out by congressional democrats and their friends in the media. But to answer your question, one is not required to be in a specific physical location for us to spy on them. right-o. So if we're spying on Russian operatives in Moscow, and they get a call from Flynn, then dot connecting is fairly simple. Additionally, it isn't democrats saying trump tower was not under surveillance, its bipartisan across the board. In this specific case we were spying on Russian diplomats that were here in the United States. The Russian Ambassador lives in the United States. He was the one that was on the call with Flynn. And I was referring to the Trump collusion with Russia when I said the dots were easier to connect on my end.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 21, 2017 8:39:01 GMT -5
The building is on fire, Trumps running around with matches and Gowdy's concern is who called the fire department.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Mar 21, 2017 9:48:01 GMT -5
The building is on fire, Trumps running around with matches and Gowdy's concern is who called the fire department. As usual... Completely backwards. Keep sucking the devils dick tho. Hey Ff2.... HILLARY LOST!!!! HAHAHAAHAA GONNA BE A LONG 8 YEARS FOR YOU
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Mar 21, 2017 10:26:48 GMT -5
Russian mafia boss still at large after FBI wiretap at Trump Tower Good Morning America By BRIAN ROSS and MATTHEW MOSK 49 minutes ago
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 21, 2017 11:47:29 GMT -5
The building is on fire, Trumps running around with matches and Gowdy's concern is who called the fire department. Please. They've been rubbing sticks together since July and still nothing. Comey couldn't get laid in a whore house.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Mar 21, 2017 12:32:02 GMT -5
The building is on fire, Trumps running around with matches and Gowdy's concern is who called the fire department. ...what bldg is on fire?
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 21, 2017 13:59:32 GMT -5
The building is on fire, Trumps running around with matches and Gowdy's concern is who called the fire department. Please. They've been rubbing sticks together since July and still nothing. Comey couldn't get laid in a whore house. Yet he announced Clinton's email investigation right aways. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Mar 21, 2017 14:12:33 GMT -5
Please. They've been rubbing sticks together since July and still nothing. Comey couldn't get laid in a whore house. Yet he announced Clinton's email investigation right aways. Go figure. Thats called he pissed his fucking pants and thought he was busted and off to prison.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 21, 2017 16:27:20 GMT -5
Please. They've been rubbing sticks together since July and still nothing. Comey couldn't get laid in a whore house. Yet he announced Clinton's email investigation right aways. Go figure. In Clinton's case there was actually evidence. The "evidence" in Trump's case is hearsay and illegal leaks of legal conversations. And Clinton got off bc they said she didnt intend to do anything wrong. If he couldnt land Clinton there is no way he is landing Trump.
|
|