|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 7:33:06 GMT -5
Then what did you mean? You said, "These victims have profited from these services, they are not simply posting pics. This is a business venture for them and I do not care what side of the political aisle they represent."? They utilized a free platform and profited. The free ride may have ended. You don't understand how business works. YouTube needs content creators. It is a symbiotic relationship. There was no free ride. Capitalism works through the free trade of goods and services that is perceived as beneficial to both of the trading parties. YouTube wasn't offering a platform out of the kindness of their hearts. They get the bigger piece of the ad revenue than the content creators did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 8:25:16 GMT -5
They utilized a free platform and profited. The free ride may have ended. You don't understand how business works. YouTube needs content creators. It is a symbiotic relationship. There was no free ride. Capitalism works through the free trade of goods and services that is perceived as beneficial to both of the trading parties. YouTube wasn't offering a platform out of the kindness of their hearts. They get the bigger piece of the ad revenue than the content creators I understand how business works. They are using a free platform. Google should receive a bigger piece they are supplying the free platform for people.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 8:40:50 GMT -5
You don't understand how business works. YouTube needs content creators. It is a symbiotic relationship. There was no free ride. Capitalism works through the free trade of goods and services that is perceived as beneficial to both of the trading parties. YouTube wasn't offering a platform out of the kindness of their hearts. They get the bigger piece of the ad revenue than the content creators I understand how business works. They are using a free platform. Google should receive a bigger piece they are supplying the free platform for people. No one is arguing that! You were implying that because it is a "free" platform they had a "free ride" and shouldn't complain that they are subjected to different rules due to politics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 8:46:56 GMT -5
I understand how business works. They are using a free platform. Google should receive a bigger piece they are supplying the free platform for people. No one is arguing that! You were implying that because it is a "free" platform they had a "free ride" and shouldn't complain that they are subjected to different rules due to politics. You want to argue these are the only persons who were fucked over by YouTube? Besides the leaked ignorant emails did YouTube take official action against any of the mentioned persons?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 9:07:20 GMT -5
No one is arguing that! You were implying that because it is a "free" platform they had a "free ride" and shouldn't complain that they are subjected to different rules due to politics. You want to argue these are the only persons who were fucked over by YouTube? Besides the leaked ignorant emails did YouTube take official action against any of the mentioned persons? It is more than leaked emails. It is a video interview with a whistle blower, undercover video of a top Google employee talking about using corporate resources and search algorithm tweaks to skew an election, internal documents that show how they would do that and showing it is company policy.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 9:16:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 9:37:50 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 10:12:04 GMT -5
You want to argue these are the only persons who were fucked over by YouTube? Besides the leaked ignorant emails did YouTube take official action against any of the mentioned persons? It is more than leaked emails. It is a video interview with a whistle blower, undercover video of a top Google employee talking about using corporate resources and search algorithm tweaks to skew an election, internal documents that show how they would do that and showing it is company policy. I do not trust Project Veritas, O’Keefe is a tool.
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Jul 1, 2019 10:32:08 GMT -5
I wish Crenshaw was my rep. I'm stuck with crap like Kathleen Rice, Schumer, and Gilly the Sock Puppet
oh yeah? Well I'm stuck with Spartacus and Menendez in NJ.
I'm pretty sure I have it worse.
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Jul 1, 2019 10:38:02 GMT -5
KINKY!
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Jul 1, 2019 11:14:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 1, 2019 11:17:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jul 1, 2019 11:25:21 GMT -5
We made a Lenin 'do to compliment Marx. The smooth head made it a no-brainer, but we ran into difficulties during test runs. The nose was too pointy and I'd rather not make them at all than alter Lenin's visage.
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Jul 1, 2019 11:28:56 GMT -5
We made a Lenin 'do to compliment Marx. The smooth head made it a no-brainer, but we ran into difficulties during test runs. The nose was too pointy and I'd rather not make them at all than alter Lenin's visage. any truth to the throwback oscar gamble version. ragu was wondering
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jul 1, 2019 12:09:30 GMT -5
It is more than leaked emails. It is a video interview with a whistle blower, undercover video of a top Google employee talking about using corporate resources and search algorithm tweaks to skew an election, internal documents that show how they would do that and showing it is company policy. I do not trust Project Veritas, O’Keefe is a tool. so are you...
|
|