|
Post by Trades on Jul 10, 2019 8:55:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 10, 2019 8:57:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jul 10, 2019 9:24:19 GMT -5
You think Acosta had final say on that deal? I am glad that Trump actually makes the media do their jobs bc I know the truth will come out about the deal. Acosta was the US Attorney. Yes he was. But that doesnt answer my question. Do you think he had final say? Do you think a plea deal involving a well-connected billionaire doesnt get looked at by someone higher than US Attorney? I think if they keep probing Acosta we are going to find out. Boomerang perhaps.
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Jul 10, 2019 9:28:39 GMT -5
Acosta was the US Attorney. Yes he was. But that doesnt answer my question. Do you think he had final say? Do you think a plea deal involving a well-connected billionaire doesnt get looked at by someone higher than US Attorney? I think if they keep probing Acosta we are going to find out. Boomerang perhaps. acosta was told to back off by higher-ups, that epstein was working in a realm higher than acosta's pay grade. epstein wasn't doing this shit for himself -- seriously, a fucking private school teacher becomes this fucking blackmailing genius hooking the heavy-hitters of the world? dude was a tool for some intel agency. a well-paid one but a tool nonetheless
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Jul 10, 2019 9:39:48 GMT -5
Yup - it's very simple - Dems want to declare illegal entry a civil offense so that law enforcement no longer has a mandate to do anything about it. They're going to hand out tickets now? What a joke. As before, Dems want the crime of illegal entry to no longer precipitate removal. Basically, if you get here you will stay. They should lose the election on this alone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 10:13:19 GMT -5
Acosta was the US Attorney. Yes he was. But that doesnt answer my question. Do you think he had final say? Do you think a plea deal involving a well-connected billionaire doesnt get looked at by someone higher than US Attorney? I think if they keep probing Acosta we are going to find out. Boomerang perhaps. He personally negotiated with Epstein’s attorneys not to charge him federal, that was his decision.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jul 10, 2019 10:15:16 GMT -5
Acosta was the US Attorney. Yes he was. But that doesnt answer my question. Do you think he had final say? Do you think a plea deal involving a well-connected billionaire doesnt get looked at by someone higher than US Attorney? I think if they keep probing Acosta we are going to find out. Boomerang perhaps. Might find out at 2:30. He's holding a press conference.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jul 10, 2019 10:17:01 GMT -5
Showing their true colors. He was cooperating and had a deal with the govt, those deals usually offer immunity, once he began not,cooperating that deal goes out of the window. He will now be charged. Huh? You said he was already convicted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 10:19:52 GMT -5
Yes he was. But that doesnt answer my question. Do you think he had final say? Do you think a plea deal involving a well-connected billionaire doesnt get looked at by someone higher than US Attorney? I think if they keep probing Acosta we are going to find out. Boomerang perhaps. acosta was told to back off by higher-ups, that epstein was working in a realm higher than acosta's pay grade. epstein wasn't doing this shit for himself -- seriously, a fucking private school teacher becomes this fucking blackmailing genius hooking the heavy-hitters of the world? dude was a tool for some intel agency. a well-paid one but a tool nonetheless Who and what documentation shows Acosta was told to back off? What are you talking about?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 10:21:43 GMT -5
He was cooperating and had a deal with the govt, those deals usually offer immunity, once he began not,cooperating that deal goes out of the window. He will now be charged. Huh? You said he was already convicted. He plead guilty and is waiting to be sentenced, he was cooperating in an effort to lower his sentence. Understand now?
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jul 10, 2019 10:28:20 GMT -5
Huh? You said he was already convicted. He plead guilty and is waiting to be sentenced, he was cooperating in an effort to lower his sentence. Understand now? You lied again. I understand.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Jul 10, 2019 10:45:19 GMT -5
She has one valid point in the midst of all that garbage shes spewing... if more people went to women's soccer games, bought jerseys, etc, then women's soccer generates more revenue, and they have a better case for higher pay. Hope all the people tweeting about the lack of women's soccer pay are putting their money where their mouths are. Until then, the US men's team may suck, comparatively, but men's soccer globally generates more revenue than women's soccer, so the pay should be higher.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 10, 2019 10:54:41 GMT -5
She has one valid point in the midst of all that garbage shes spewing... if more people went to women's soccer games, bought jerseys, etc, then women's soccer generates more revenue, and they have a better case for higher pay. Hope all the people tweeting about the lack of women's soccer pay are putting their money where their mouths are. Until then, the US men's team may suck, comparatively, but men's soccer globally generates more revenue than women's soccer, so the pay should be higher. Agreed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 11:02:11 GMT -5
He plead guilty and is waiting to be sentenced, he was cooperating in an effort to lower his sentence. Understand now? You lied again. I understand. Plead guilty means what to you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 11:12:50 GMT -5
She has one valid point in the midst of all that garbage shes spewing... if more people went to women's soccer games, bought jerseys, etc, then women's soccer generates more revenue, and they have a better case for higher pay. Hope all the people tweeting about the lack of women's soccer pay are putting their money where their mouths are. Until then, the US men's team may suck, comparatively, but men's soccer globally generates more revenue than women's soccer, so the pay should be higher. FIFA needs to be looked into due to their past, if Nike’s #1 selling jersey is the US Women’s soccer jersey, is the licensing deal thru USA soccer or FIFA?
|
|