|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jul 17, 2019 21:49:12 GMT -5
He’s too funny. Again, he’s that Irishman who says “is this a private fight or can anyone join?” Makes me laugh. He’s doing a rally right now in NC - he really seems on tonite. We need to do hampurcon 2019 at a Trump rally! 😂 I’m serious, would be more fun than Met Death. I’ve been to one. They are a total blast. Like a rock concert. I’m going to go to one. Are the bars open at these arenas?
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jul 18, 2019 1:17:54 GMT -5
He’s too funny. Again, he’s that Irishman who says “is this a private fight or can anyone join?” Makes me laugh. He’s doing a rally right now in NC - he really seems on tonite. We need to do hampurcon 2019 at a Trump rally! 😂 I’m serious, would be more fun than Met Death. I’ve been to one. They are a total blast. Like a rock concert. Woah for real? You been to one of those?? I think I'd be too freaked out to go. But now I thinking back on it I think a old buddy of mine and a couple friends went to one on LSD during the battle vs Hillary lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 6:54:49 GMT -5
Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul stall the 9-11 responders bill. The 6 NO votes in the House vote were Republicans too.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 18, 2019 7:40:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 18, 2019 7:55:16 GMT -5
335-95-1!!! Almost like it was all empty rhetoric.
Even the oh so principled Justin Amash voted against impeachment. I thought he said that Trump should be impeached.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jul 18, 2019 8:18:08 GMT -5
They’re already calling her a white supremacist... doesn't she automatically become a racist hatemonger by running against All Out Crazy?...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 8:38:06 GMT -5
335-95-1!!! Almost like it was all empty rhetoric. Even the oh so principled Justin Amash voted against impeachment. I thought he said that Trump should be impeached. Wasn’t the impeachment vote called solely from the tweets about the squad?
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jul 18, 2019 8:48:59 GMT -5
Scottish. He's Scottish. Not a donkey, not a filthy itralian. MAGA LMAO!!!! that’s all you got?🤣. Went to a FULL Italian wedding on LI last week. GF was like, holy shit, that was amazing. I said, Baby, that was the cocktail hour. They haven’t served dinner yet. She looked at me and said... you must be kidding. She is from Canton Ohio. whoa whoa whoa...you have a GF?!...
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Jul 18, 2019 9:01:15 GMT -5
They’re already calling her a white supremacist... doesn't she automatically become a racist hatemonger by running against All Out Crazy?... Does not really matter. She could run against a Dem loaf of Rye bread and still lose in that district. Unless Pelosi primaries her she will be re-elected.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Jul 18, 2019 9:01:53 GMT -5
Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul stall the 9-11 responders bill. The 6 NO votes in the House vote were Republicans too. Paul objected to Unanimous Consent, which would have fast tracked it and skipped a bunch of steps. He wants to make sure that any long term expense will have offsetting cuts somewhere else. At least someone cares about the debt. And Lee wants to make sure there is proper oversight for the fund to prevent fraud. I get it, I'm a huge proponent of the money getting spent on 9/11 responders. If Schumer and Gillibrand want the funding so bad, shouldnt they be able to find some offsetting cuts to make pretty easily?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 9:15:03 GMT -5
Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul stall the 9-11 responders bill. The 6 NO votes in the House vote were Republicans too. Paul objected to Unanimous Consent, which would have fast tracked it and skipped a bunch of steps. He wants to make sure that any long term expense will have offsetting cuts somewhere else. At least someone cares about the debt. And Lee wants to make sure there is proper oversight for the fund to prevent fraud. I get it, I'm a huge proponent of the money getting spent on 9/11 responders. If Schumer and Gillibrand want the funding so bad, shouldnt they be able to find some offsetting cuts to make pretty easily? This should not be a Dem vs Rep issue.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jul 18, 2019 9:34:31 GMT -5
Paul objected to Unanimous Consent, which would have fast tracked it and skipped a bunch of steps. He wants to make sure that any long term expense will have offsetting cuts somewhere else. At least someone cares about the debt. And Lee wants to make sure there is proper oversight for the fund to prevent fraud. I get it, I'm a huge proponent of the money getting spent on 9/11 responders. If Schumer and Gillibrand want the funding so bad, shouldnt they be able to find some offsetting cuts to make pretty easily? This should not be a Dem vs Rep issue. It should also not be something rammed through to make us feel good. Paul is right. Funding this bill for 70-80 years requires the proper offset so as not to drive us further into debt. Discussion as to what should be cut should be had beforehand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 9:42:09 GMT -5
This should not be a Dem vs Rep issue. It should also not be something rammed through to make us feel good. Paul is right. Funding this bill for 70-80 years requires the proper offset so as not to drive us further into debt. Discussion as to what should be cut should be had beforehand. Rammed? It is 2019 and every year the responders have to deal with the uncertainty for coverage. This fund should be paid out of the DOD anyway, it was an act of war. DOD has way too much money.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jul 18, 2019 9:49:31 GMT -5
It should also not be something rammed through to make us feel good. Paul is right. Funding this bill for 70-80 years requires the proper offset so as not to drive us further into debt. Discussion as to what should be cut should be had beforehand. Rammed? It is 2019 and every year the responders have to deal with the uncertainty for coverage. This fund should be paid out of the DOD anyway, it was an act of war. DOD has way too much money. Asking for unanimous consent = rammed I have zero issue with the funding offset by DoD.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 10:16:15 GMT -5
Rammed? It is 2019 and every year the responders have to deal with the uncertainty for coverage. This fund should be paid out of the DOD anyway, it was an act of war. DOD has way too much money. Asking for unanimous consent = rammed I have zero issue with the funding offset by DoD. We all know Rand will vote no, look at his record, that is his deal.
|
|