|
Post by quantum on Jul 24, 2019 8:58:37 GMT -5
thats bullshit. wonder what he's hiding?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:00:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:01:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:03:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:04:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:09:49 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2019 9:11:37 GMT -5
Gohmer”did you speak 6 months before you got this job” mueller”No”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2019 9:12:35 GMT -5
Jim Jordan was an awesome wrestler.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jul 24, 2019 9:13:00 GMT -5
Thats bullshit. There is NO existing law that allows this. They are trying to bend some current law and interpret it as such. The SC will hear the case or NYS will get there first. BUT if the law was clear, it would have happened already. The law is clear, but Trump is still fighting so we the people won’t see his beautiful financial statements, even when he stated he wants us to see them. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103None of that supports public disclosure of the presidents tax returns. He completes federal financial affidavits etc but to open his returns up to congress is not supported by that citation. Title 26 is the IRC, not general law and is the requirement between a taxpayer and the IRS not the President and congress.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:13:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2019 9:14:33 GMT -5
None of that supports public disclosure of the presidents tax returns. He completes federal financial affidavits etc but to open his returns up to congress is not supported by that citation. Trump should win his lawsuit then.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jul 24, 2019 9:16:29 GMT -5
None of that supports public disclosure of the presidents tax returns. He completes federal financial affidavits etc but to open his returns up to congress is not supported by that citation. Trump should win his lawsuit then. Who knows BUT when law is to be adjudicated, thats why we have courts but to me, Title 26 is TAX code and has no bearing on congress. It mandates a taxpayer to MUST disclose to the IRS . NOT the public, not congress. Im not a lawyer nut I have a masters degree in tax.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jul 24, 2019 9:21:13 GMT -5
None of that supports public disclosure of the presidents tax returns. He completes federal financial affidavits etc but to open his returns up to congress is not supported by that citation. Title 26 is the IRC, not general law and is the requirement between a taxpayer and the IRS not the President and congress. the courts gonna have to decide if this in congress' constitutional resposibility.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jul 24, 2019 9:26:58 GMT -5
None of that supports public disclosure of the presidents tax returns. He completes federal financial affidavits etc but to open his returns up to congress is not supported by that citation. Title 26 is the IRC, not general law and is the requirement between a taxpayer and the IRS not the President and congress. the courts gonna have to decide if this in congress' constitutional resposibility. Agreed. This is exactly the type of case the SC would hear, I don't think they should, I don't believe it is relevant here. Title 26 is IRC NOT general law. It sets tax law and in no way mandates a taxpayer to disclose his information publicly. To cite it as case law here is, in my view, erroneous.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jul 24, 2019 9:29:11 GMT -5
|
|