Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 10:15:38 GMT -5
Imagine rooting against kids that careless media and outrage culture put their lives in danger. When an attorney takes your case for free he/she does not care about the outcome they care about their income.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jul 28, 2019 10:39:55 GMT -5
Meet The Press still talking impeachment, not the disaster that was the Mueller hearing. Talking “racist” BS about Trumps Baltimore tweets even though Bernie and Obama said worse things about Baltimore. The Dems, Upchuck Todd, Adam “shrunken head from Beetlejuice” Schiff, leaks/Sybs’ husband Jerry Nadler, etc etc are the biggest ugliest dumbest nobodies in America. But, they will never stop. FUCK them. Trump needs to knock them in the teeth again.
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Jul 28, 2019 11:11:04 GMT -5
You have shown time and time again to not understand the law. Don't be daft. The standard for libel isn't 'wrong reporting' - it's knowingly false and defamatory - and in the case of the kid, would have to be specific to him. A newspaper outlet is going to have huge leeway under the 1st amendment - but some pundits may not have it that easy. That's non-controversial but feel free to bloviate - I mean what else is there to do on a Summer Sunday.........
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Jul 28, 2019 11:48:48 GMT -5
You have shown time and time again to not understand the law. Don't be daft. The standard for libel isn't 'wrong reporting' - it's knowingly false and defamatory - and in the case of the kid, would have to be specific to him. A newspaper outlet is going to have huge leeway under the 1st amendment - but some pundits may not have it that easy. That's non-controversial but feel free to bloviate - I mean what else is there to do on a Summer Sunday......... I got laid. Much better and more fun than bloviating.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jul 28, 2019 12:45:37 GMT -5
Imagine rooting against kids that careless media and outrage culture put their lives in danger. When an attorney takes your case for free he/she does not care about the outcome they care about their income. Ill bookmark this when for when Lisa Bloom and her mother crawl out from under their rock around July 2020.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 12:46:26 GMT -5
You have shown time and time again to not understand the law. Don't be daft. The standard for libel isn't 'wrong reporting' - it's knowingly false and defamatory - and in the case of the kid, would have to be specific to him. A newspaper outlet is going to have huge leeway under the 1st amendment - but some pundits may not have it that easy. That's non-controversial but feel free to bloviate - I mean what else is there to do on a Summer Sunday......... The intent needs to be there as well. For what they are claiming it is not there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 12:47:02 GMT -5
When an attorney takes your case for free he/she does not care about the outcome they care about their income. Ill bookmark this when for when Lisa Bloom and her mother crawl out from under their rock around July 2020. Lisa Bloom is a hack and is only worried about getting her name out there.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jul 28, 2019 13:30:05 GMT -5
The issue wrt the WaPo is that they mostly did reporting (and not punditry) on the story - and the bar for libel/defamation is very high in that regard. Erroneous isn't enough. The kid has other suits, IIRC, against outlets that may not have as easy a time as WaPo did. You have shown time and time again to not understand the law. LOL at you acting like you know shit about the law.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 13:31:54 GMT -5
You have shown time and time again to not understand the law. LOL at you acting like you know shit about the law. 23 years and counting.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jul 28, 2019 13:49:00 GMT -5
LOL at you acting like you know shit about the law. 23 years and counting. You claimed a judge cant set aside a verdict, insist Flynn is convicted, and lie about what a FISA warrant allows. All those cop loads you swallowed doesn't make you any smarter when it comes to the law. But keep sucking that dick.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 13:51:57 GMT -5
You claimed a judge cant set aside a verdict, insist Flynn is convicted, and lie about what a FISA warrant allows. All those cop loads you swallowed doesn't make you any smarter when it comes to the law. But keep sucking that dick. Flynn plead guilty and is awaiting his sentencing. Judges seldom use rule 33 and has that happened yet for Flynn’s partner? Getting angry just makes you look dumber (if that is possible).
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jul 28, 2019 17:20:56 GMT -5
Fully humiliated by a biased and blind fake news factory. No surprise that the judge is a democrat. Not to mention appointed by probably the worst President ever, Jimmy Carter. There will be an appeal and cases against CNN and NBC are still open. 1st amendment be damned!!!! it is amazing how every time a Judge makes a decision everyone runs to see who nominated them. 1st amendment is not in question here. the press purposefully railroaded this kid. That is not a 1st amendment issue.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jul 28, 2019 17:21:57 GMT -5
Don't be daft. The standard for libel isn't 'wrong reporting' - it's knowingly false and defamatory - and in the case of the kid, would have to be specific to him. A newspaper outlet is going to have huge leeway under the 1st amendment - but some pundits may not have it that easy. That's non-controversial but feel free to bloviate - I mean what else is there to do on a Summer Sunday......... I got laid. Much better and more fun than bloviating. Does you’re ass hurt?😂
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 17:29:40 GMT -5
1st amendment be damned!!!! it is amazing how every time a Judge makes a decision everyone runs to see who nominated them. 1st amendment is not in question here. the press purposefully railroaded this kid. That is not a 1st amendment issue. Yes it is a 1st amendment case. How you feeling about adding another 320 BILLION in spending, Trump is more concerned with getting re-elected than governing or standing by his “I will never sign a budget like this again” statement. Art of the Deal is hope no one is watching.
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Jul 28, 2019 17:42:49 GMT -5
I got laid. Much better and more fun than bloviating. Does you’re ass hurt?😂 Not one bit but she is still walking a little slow. 😜
|
|