Are we redefining entrapment as "surveillance" now comrade?
Oh and FISA odds are about 99% - but FBI lawyer says it would have been more like 50/50 without the BS dossier. That's funny..
When you conduct a surveillance the idea is not to be detected while conducting the surveillance. When they refer to the 4 times the FISA warrant was signed by a judge it fails to explain the first one aka the initial is good for 30 days then in order to renew it the govt needs to show they have gotten additional information to prove the have enough to get another 30 days. And so on
When you conduct a surveillance the idea is not to be detected while conducting the surveillance. When they refer to the 4 times the FISA warrant was signed by a judge it fails to explain the first one aka the initial is good for 30 days then in order to renew it the govt needs to show they have gotten additional information to prove the have enough to get another 30 days. And so on
Understood - I don't necessarily have a problem with the first, cause why not. But where's the beef - with three renewals? This is thin vegan minestrone - and smells like a fishing expedition.
When you conduct a surveillance the idea is not to be detected while conducting the surveillance. When they refer to the 4 times the FISA warrant was signed by a judge it fails to explain the first one aka the initial is good for 30 days then in order to renew it the govt needs to show they have gotten additional information to prove the have enough to get another 30 days. And so on
Understood - I don't necessarily have a problem with the first, cause why not. But where's the beef - with three renewals? This is thin vegan minestrone - and smells like a fishing expedition.
4 different judges signed each they would not sign off if it was a “fishing expedition”, there are several layers for each FISA warrant approval, it is a serious endeavor. There has to be new evidence for each extension.
Last Edit: Jul 30, 2019 21:19:08 GMT -5 by Deleted
Are we redefining entrapment as "surveillance" now comrade?
Oh and FISA odds are about 99% - but FBI lawyer says it would have been more like 50/50 without the BS dossier. That's funny..
When you conduct a surveillance the idea is not to be detected while conducting the surveillance. When they refer to the 4 times the FISA warrant was signed by a judge it fails to explain the first one aka the initial is good for 30 days then in order to renew it the govt needs to show they have gotten additional information to prove the have enough to get another 30 days. And so on
When you conduct a surveillance the idea is not to be detected while conducting the surveillance. When they refer to the 4 times the FISA warrant was signed by a judge it fails to explain the first one aka the initial is good for 30 days then in order to renew it the govt needs to show they have gotten additional information to prove the have enough to get another 30 days. And so on
90 days dumbass. You're lying again.
Sorry normal Title III affidavits/orders are 30 days.
Team not sport. The men's world cup made 10x what the women's world cup did.
Just a few more teams too. The World cup alone there are 8 more mens teams. You may he shocked but Saudi Arabia doesnt have a womens team.
Sorry I was wrong about something. The men's world cup generates over 45 TIMES what the women's world cup does. So much for merch sales.
But that inequality, as Forbes explains, is entirely due to the astronomical disparity in revenue:
As Dwight Jaynes pointed out four years ago after the U.S. women beat Japan to capture the World Cup in Vancouver, there is a big difference in the revenue available to pay the teams. The Women's World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men's World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players.
The men still pull the World Cup money wagon. The men's World Cup in Russia generated over $6 billion in revenue, with the participating teams sharing $400 million, less than 7% of revenue. Meanwhile, the Women's World Cup is expected to earn $131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-22 and dole out $30 million to the participating teams.
So that is $6 billion v. $131 million. The women aren't even in the same universe, in terms of revenue. If the women were paid the same total as the men — $400 million — they would be making nearly four times more than they generate. The men make 7% of their revenue. The women apparently want 400% of theirs. That's absurd, obviously, to say the least.
"I'm 80 years old and I want results now," the Jets dismissed Coach Pete Carroll today after one season and replaced him with Rich Kotite.
"I'm entitled to some enjoyment, and that means winning," said Hess today, virtually branding the team as quitters under Carroll for their late-season collapse. Their five straight defeats insured a losing record for the 18th time in 35 seasons and entrenched the Jets' reputation as a perennial losing franch
"I'm 80 years old and I want results now," the Jets dismissed Coach Pete Carroll today after one season and replaced him with Rich Kotite.
"I'm entitled to some enjoyment, and that means winning," said Hess today, virtually branding the team as quitters under Carroll for their late-season collapse. Their five straight defeats insured a losing record for the 18th time in 35 seasons and entrenched the Jets' reputation as a perennial losing franch
Just a few more teams too. The World cup alone there are 8 more mens teams. You may he shocked but Saudi Arabia doesnt have a womens team.
Sorry I was wrong about something. The men's world cup generates over 45 TIMES what the women's world cup does. So much for merch sales.
But that inequality, as Forbes explains, is entirely due to the astronomical disparity in revenue:
As Dwight Jaynes pointed out four years ago after the U.S. women beat Japan to capture the World Cup in Vancouver, there is a big difference in the revenue available to pay the teams. The Women's World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men's World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players.
The men still pull the World Cup money wagon. The men's World Cup in Russia generated over $6 billion in revenue, with the participating teams sharing $400 million, less than 7% of revenue. Meanwhile, the Women's World Cup is expected to earn $131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-22 and dole out $30 million to the participating teams.
So that is $6 billion v. $131 million. The women aren't even in the same universe, in terms of revenue. If the women were paid the same total as the men — $400 million — they would be making nearly four times more than they generate. The men make 7% of their revenue. The women apparently want 400% of theirs. That's absurd, obviously, to say the least.
It all comes down to the massive television contracts for the men’s game. The womens game is up and coming and has had a big impact here. It is interesting how persons argue about what is fair when FIFA is essentially socialism, all the teams get massive amounts of money for belonging to FIFA. The US Women have dominated and it is not their fault their league has only been around for less than 30 years.
It all comes down to the massive television contracts for the men’s game. The womens game is up and coming and has had a big impact here. It is interesting how persons argue about what is fair when FIFA is essentially socialism, all the teams get massive amounts of money for belonging to FIFA. The US Women have dominated and it is not their fault their league has only been around for less than 30 years.
LOL keep reaching for excuses. It isn't socialism because it isn't run by the government. It is run by team committees a commissioner and a board.
No it isn't the women's fault just as it isn't their fault that women's sports (for the most part) is no where near as entertaining as watching men's sports. People want to watch the best and will pay more money to do so. It is why a top band draws more viewers and makes a lot more than a cover band. Yes they are both performing the same activity but they don't deserve the same pay even if the cover band is knocking it out of the park and plays better than the headliner some times. It is about viewership, culture, perception of quality, consistency and notoriety.
Women's teams would probably have trouble beating most men's college teams. Look at pro tennis when women play men they rarely win.
Goodell is a hypocrite
"I'm 80 years old and I want results now," the Jets dismissed Coach Pete Carroll today after one season and replaced him with Rich Kotite.
"I'm entitled to some enjoyment, and that means winning," said Hess today, virtually branding the team as quitters under Carroll for their late-season collapse. Their five straight defeats insured a losing record for the 18th time in 35 seasons and entrenched the Jets' reputation as a perennial losing franch
What we should all be talking about. They all cant go to Europe.
The most humane solution to migration is to help these countries build infrastructure and economies that can sustain people.
There are so many problems with trying to help African nations, the worst of which is warlords take most of the aid and it never gets to the people. Helping them would be great if they want the help and use it properly. We (both publicly and privately) give billions every year to countries in Africa and what progress has been shown?
Goodell is a hypocrite
"I'm 80 years old and I want results now," the Jets dismissed Coach Pete Carroll today after one season and replaced him with Rich Kotite.
"I'm entitled to some enjoyment, and that means winning," said Hess today, virtually branding the team as quitters under Carroll for their late-season collapse. Their five straight defeats insured a losing record for the 18th time in 35 seasons and entrenched the Jets' reputation as a perennial losing franch
"I'm 80 years old and I want results now," the Jets dismissed Coach Pete Carroll today after one season and replaced him with Rich Kotite.
"I'm entitled to some enjoyment, and that means winning," said Hess today, virtually branding the team as quitters under Carroll for their late-season collapse. Their five straight defeats insured a losing record for the 18th time in 35 seasons and entrenched the Jets' reputation as a perennial losing franch