|
Post by 2foolish on Aug 23, 2019 16:48:10 GMT -5
his speaking fee is probably upwards of 250K to 500K hers about 100K. That, books, and yes, he probably saved his presidential salary. 🤣 The Obama’s started a production company and have a Netflix deal. hows your Trump derangement syndrome doin?...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2019 17:34:25 GMT -5
He is too busy fucking up the economy.... you got that right... Trump’s daddy can’t save him. You got that right.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Aug 23, 2019 18:30:32 GMT -5
...finally i get something right yep finally
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Aug 23, 2019 19:02:36 GMT -5
you got that right... Trump’s daddy can’t save him. You got that right. now are you done playing that childish little game of changing someones posts?...i mean anyone can do it...but we don't...
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 23, 2019 19:04:51 GMT -5
She will die on the bench rather than give Trump her spot. As I have sad before, equal parts sad and admirable.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 23, 2019 19:10:47 GMT -5
i don't think Trumps gonna have enough time...he got his two in...should be satisfied... If she dies by March 2020 they will have one in before the election. And thats what its going to take. She is going out on her shield. I wish her a speedy recovery. I actually think her holding on past the election will help Trump. He will get votes for his judicial picks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2019 19:39:59 GMT -5
i don't think Trumps gonna have enough time...he got his two in...should be satisfied... If she dies by March 2020 they will have one in before the election. And thats what its going to take. She is going out on her shield. I wish her a speedy recovery. I actually think her holding on past the election will help Trump. He will get votes for his judicial picks. If she passed away in in Trump’s fourth year; McConnell would never change his philosophy about letting a Justice being appointed in the final year of a Presidency. Gee that would be hypocritical.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Aug 23, 2019 21:16:55 GMT -5
If she dies by March 2020 they will have one in before the election.  And thats what its going to take. She is going out on her shield. I wish her a speedy recovery. I actually think her holding on past the election will help Trump. He will get votes for his judicial picks. If she passed away in in Trump’s fourth year; McConnell would never change his philosophy about letting a Justice being appointed in the final year of a Presidency.  Gee that would be hypocritical.  It's Mitch McConnell. Of course it's hypocritical.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 23, 2019 21:39:27 GMT -5
If she dies by March 2020 they will have one in before the election. And thats what its going to take. She is going out on her shield. I wish her a speedy recovery. I actually think her holding on past the election will help Trump. He will get votes for his judicial picks. If she passed away in in Trump’s fourth year; McConnell would never change his philosophy about letting a Justice being appointed in the final year of a Presidency. Gee that would be hypocritical. McConnell's philosophy has nothing to do with a POTUS power to appoint or the Senate's power to confirm a SCJ in the final year. His philosophy is simply a POTUS has the right to nominate and the Senate has the right to tell them to fuck off. Both constitutionally sound based on the separation of powers. Elections have consequences. You want all your nominations to go through then you have to win the Senate.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 23, 2019 21:41:38 GMT -5
If she passed away in in Trump’s fourth year; McConnell would never change his philosophy about letting a Justice being appointed in the final year of a Presidency. Gee that would be hypocritical. It's Mitch McConnell. Of course it's hypocritical. Its not hypocritical. The MSM and DNC are trying to distort what Republicans did with Garland. The Senate controls confirmations. If Obama really wanted to get another SCJ through he could have consulted with McConnel and made a deal. They were convinced Hillary was going to win so they didnt care to.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Aug 23, 2019 21:43:36 GMT -5
It's Mitch McConnell. Of course it's hypocritical. Its not hypocritical. The MSM and DNC are trying to distort what Republicans did with Garland. The Senate controls confirmations. If Obama really wanted to get another SCJ through he could have consulted with McConnel and made a deal. They were convinced Hillary was going to win so they didnt care to.  The was making a broad generalization about Mitch and politicians in general.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 23, 2019 22:19:42 GMT -5
Its not hypocritical. The MSM and DNC are trying to distort what Republicans did with Garland. The Senate controls confirmations. If Obama really wanted to get another SCJ through he could have consulted with McConnel and made a deal. They were convinced Hillary was going to win so they didnt care to. The was making a broad generalization about Mitch and politicians in general. Fair enough. There are many things I dont like about Mitch but when you get 70% of what you want you gotta take the win.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Aug 24, 2019 11:00:36 GMT -5
TOLERANCE!
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Aug 24, 2019 17:34:56 GMT -5
It’s always for the children....... Yet those children are kept in schools with failure rates of 80 percent and higher in many cities. Public housing in almost all cities is rat and roach infested. But yes, let’s do it for the children. liberals and government always do it for the children.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Aug 25, 2019 20:46:06 GMT -5
|
|