Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 16:30:56 GMT -5
Gee thanks dickhead. When disasters happen the 2 major needs are water and fuel, pay now or pay later? Fuel standards should remain high and innovations should be rewarded. If you were smarter you wouldn't have needed me to explain it. Innovation is always rewarded by the market and innovations are usually hindered by the "well meaning" government. I don’t “need” you to explain it. You want to pontificate. Your constant twitter feeds of rightwing pundits doesn’t make you smarter than anyone it just makes you see it one way.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Dec 4, 2018 16:34:00 GMT -5
Once it is viable. They have been predicting running out of fossil fuels since the late 1800s not to mention how many times we have all starved to death due to over population, lack of clean water, lack of food, ozone depletion, global warming, global cooling, etc. Human ingenuity wins every time. The only thing that would be achieved by giving the government more power over our energy production, which is what she really wants, is higher prices, resource scarcity, lack of innovation, loss of job and a recession. Let the market forces do their thing. And yes, before you say it, remove ALL subsidies for fossil fuels and renewables and let them compete in the market. Technological advances have def helped in every facet of life. The incredible hard on you guys have for her is comical. She’s one of 435 reps, not exactly a lot of national power, she like all the others before her will fall in line and start taking money from all types of groups in order to get re-elected. She is an absolute moron. She fails to have a grasp on high school level civics, or Econ 101, and apparently has a degree in Economics from Boston University. She makes Bernie Sanders sound like John Maynard Keynes... and that's saying something. The left made a sport of mocking Sarah Palin.... Ocasio Cortez makes her look like a MENSA member in comparison. Its less a hard-on and more taking delight in pointing out the daily gaffes of someone who got elected on a bunch of promises of free stuff. Maybe she should use her time between now and January to do less tweeting and public appearances, and maybe crack open some books on economics and public policy?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2018 16:48:07 GMT -5
If you were smarter you wouldn't have needed me to explain it. Innovation is always rewarded by the market and innovations are usually hindered by the "well meaning" government. I don’t “need” you to explain it. You want to pontificate. Your constant twitter feeds of rightwing pundits doesn’t make you smarter than anyone it just makes you see it one way. I post things against the republicans too. Check the Voter thread today. I post things I feel are interesting and that typically contain sources and details you post garbage blaming the messenger most of the time.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2018 16:51:00 GMT -5
Another
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Dec 4, 2018 16:53:25 GMT -5
Once it is viable. They have been predicting running out of fossil fuels since the late 1800s not to mention how many times we have all starved to death due to over population, lack of clean water, lack of food, ozone depletion, global warming, global cooling, etc. Human ingenuity wins every time. The only thing that would be achieved by giving the government more power over our energy production, which is what she really wants, is higher prices, resource scarcity, lack of innovation, loss of job and a recession. Let the market forces do their thing. And yes, before you say it, remove ALL subsidies for fossil fuels and renewables and let them compete in the market. Technological advances have def helped in every facet of life. Capitalism says "youre welcome". As was mentioned previously, remove all subsidies and let fossil fuels and renewables duke it out. I do believe the latter are the future, just not necessarily the near future, unless the government intervenes in the marketplace.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 17:03:38 GMT -5
Technological advances have def helped in every facet of life. Capitalism says "youre welcome". As was mentioned previously, remove all subsidies and let fossil fuels and renewables duke it out. I do believe the latter are the future, just not necessarily the near future, unless the government intervenes in the marketplace. The government both state and federal have intervened with solar and some other incentives.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 17:06:03 GMT -5
I don’t “need” you to explain it. You want to pontificate. Your constant twitter feeds of rightwing pundits doesn’t make you smarter than anyone it just makes you see it one way. I post things against the republicans too. Check the Voter thread today. I post things I feel are interesting and that typically contain sources and details you post garbage blaming the messenger most of the time. Charlie Kirk and the others are known bullshitters, they manipulate and ignore facts to fit their viewpoint.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2018 17:07:15 GMT -5
I post things against the republicans too. Check the Voter thread today. I post things I feel are interesting and that typically contain sources and details you post garbage blaming the messenger most of the time. Charlie Kirk and the others are known bullshitters, they manipulate and ignore facts to fit their viewpoint. So for once go after the point instead of the messenger. Especially when they are just retwatting an article.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 17:09:09 GMT -5
Charlie Kirk and the others are known bullshitters, they manipulate and ignore facts to fit their viewpoint. So for once go after the point instead of the messenger. Especially when they are just retwatting an article. The messenger is the source of the problem. They only post from rightwing sources.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2018 17:20:23 GMT -5
So for once go after the point instead of the messenger. Especially when they are just retwatting an article. The messenger is the source of the problem. They only post from rightwing sources. SO THEN REFUTE THE POINT! It should be easy, right?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2018 17:37:46 GMT -5
These damn people always pushing their party line!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2018 18:49:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Dec 5, 2018 5:29:12 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2018 7:16:59 GMT -5
This is the one thing she said about Bush and then went on to talk about herself. Bush 41 was a diplomat who served this country. The Tarriff guy is a conservative? You’ve lost it.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 5, 2018 8:59:27 GMT -5
|
|