|
Post by RobR on Jun 9, 2022 10:25:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Jun 9, 2022 10:29:44 GMT -5
I would say the shooter is in trouble. He was not under "LIFE THREATENING" circumstances BUT I would side with him. I could see some on a jury saying he should not have shot.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jun 9, 2022 10:45:30 GMT -5
I would say the shooter is in trouble. He was not under "LIFE THREATENING" circumstances BUT I would side with him. I could see some on a jury saying he should not have shot. He should have shot the guy, but the three slugs probably should have gone in the guy's leg and then reassess.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jun 9, 2022 10:51:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 9, 2022 10:52:16 GMT -5
I would say the shooter is in trouble. He was not under "LIFE THREATENING" circumstances BUT I would side with him. I could see some on a jury saying he should not have shot. He should have shot the guy, but the three slugs probably should have gone in the guy's leg and then reassess. Nope. Shoot to kill, NEVER shoot to maim, that is how you get yourself shot by the guy that is laying on the ground but still has his gun. I just took a gun course in NJ and they said if a guy has a gun drawn on you or someone else you are justified to shoot.
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Jun 9, 2022 10:53:54 GMT -5
I would say the shooter is in trouble. He was not under "LIFE THREATENING" circumstances BUT I would side with him. I could see some on a jury saying he should not have shot. The perp has a gun in his hand. If that is not a threat of great bodily harm then I don't know what is.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 9, 2022 10:54:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Jun 9, 2022 10:56:01 GMT -5
I would say the shooter is in trouble. He was not under "LIFE THREATENING" circumstances BUT I would side with him. I could see some on a jury saying he should not have shot. He should have shot the guy, but the three slugs probably should have gone in the guy's leg and then reassess. No, just no. Trying to wound someone who has a gun in his hand is just plain dumb.
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Jun 9, 2022 10:56:51 GMT -5
He should have shot the guy, but the three slugs probably should have gone in the guy's leg and then reassess. Nope. Shoot to kill, NEVER shoot to maim, that is how you get yourself shot by the guy that is laying on the ground but still has his gun. I just took a gun course in NJ and they said if a guy has a gun drawn on you or someone else you are justified to shoot. This is the correct answer.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jun 9, 2022 11:00:33 GMT -5
lol Fine guys, I'm an idiot. Don't own any firearms and probably never will. They'll be pretty useless for the zombie apocalypse anyway. My cache of melee weapons will help when the time comes.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jun 9, 2022 12:40:11 GMT -5
lol Fine guys, I'm an idiot. Don't own any firearms and probably never will. They'll be pretty useless for the zombie apocalypse anyway. My cache of melee weapons will help when the time comes. Damm, I thought you were being sarcastic. Between this and calling a guy a poop head on JN is putting your man card in jeopardy.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jun 9, 2022 12:40:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jun 9, 2022 12:41:54 GMT -5
He should have shot the guy, but the three slugs probably should have gone in the guy's leg and then reassess. Nope. Shoot to kill, NEVER shoot to maim, that is how you get yourself shot by the guy that is laying on the ground but still has his gun. I just took a gun course in NJ and they said if a guy has a gun drawn on you or someone else you are justified to shoot. Also how you get yourself arrested and put on trial. Dead man cant lie to a jury.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 9, 2022 12:46:57 GMT -5
She really thinks black people don't have guns!?!?!
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 9, 2022 13:01:25 GMT -5
|
|