|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 26, 2017 12:11:23 GMT -5
Hollywood Nosebleed (Raiders) on the clock. Next 3 picks: heymangold (Texans) ventesette (Seahawks) @indianajet (Chiefs) Please PM your picks if you will not be around. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by Paradis on Mar 26, 2017 12:38:40 GMT -5
Barnett's over rated and not every versatile IMO... hooker's injured and lattimore will be. I'm not spending a top 10 pick on secondary unless that shit is lock tight. Not even close with Lattimore... How about Offense? how about the best playmaker in the draft? You're asking me to consider a corner because of his upside/impact, and yet RB is excluded because sometimes round 4 guys are productive for a couple years? I just don't think cook will be a dynamic playmaker in the NFL. Frankly, unless Adams is available at 6, I hope the Jets trade out of the spot. can't argue with the character stuff, but not a dynamic playmaker? can't understnd that. |
|
|
|
Post by ventesette on Mar 26, 2017 12:40:00 GMT -5
Seahawks pick #58 is on the market. Taking offers. Otherwise I will reach for a guy that I would take with one of my 3rds
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Mar 26, 2017 13:15:26 GMT -5
I just don't think cook will be a dynamic playmaker in the NFL. Frankly, unless Adams is available at 6, I hope the Jets trade out of the spot. can't argue with the character stuff, but not a dynamic playmaker? can't understnd that. Everyone on D is bigger and faster in the pros and the field is smaller. I don't think he will have the space he needs to be successful and the hits will take their toll in a 16 game season. Admittedly, I could be wrong, but remind me... How good was Reggie Bush supposed to be in the NFL? |
|
|
|
Post by ventesette on Mar 26, 2017 16:11:11 GMT -5
Can't decide if I should reach for the guy I really want for the Seahawks that *should* last until 90, or just take the rational pick. I will decide in a few minutes if nobody wants to trade up.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 16:17:43 GMT -5
Can't decide if I should reach for the guy I really want for the Seahawks that *should* last until 90, or just take the rational pick. I will decide in a few minutes if nobody wants to trade up. Go with your gut, you never know what will happen in the real draft. |
|
|
|
Post by ventesette on Mar 26, 2017 16:43:16 GMT -5
Can't decide if I should reach for the guy I really want for the Seahawks that *should* last until 90, or just take the rational pick. I will decide in a few minutes if nobody wants to trade up. Go with your gut, you never know what will happen in the real draft. Yeah, I didn't want to lose out on Kpassagnon for the Seahawks. I thought he might last to 90, but didn't want to risk it. Hodges was my alternative, but they do still have Willson and Graham, so a later round project is probably fine there. As opposed to a 2nd round project. 
PM sent to IndianaJet |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 16:47:22 GMT -5
Go with your gut, you never know what will happen in the real draft. Yeah, I didn't want to lose out on Kpassagnon for the Seahawks. I thought he might last to 90, but didn't want to risk it. Hodges was my alternative, but they do still have Willson and Graham, so a later round project is probably fine there. As opposed to a 2nd round project.
PM sent to IndianaJet I remember he had a very good senior bowl and those type of players always rise come draft day. |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 17:43:21 GMT -5
Nice pick heymangold. Moton is one of my sleepers that I hope the Jets draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 19:10:24 GMT -5
And just like that, my two favorite sleeper Olineman are gone. Nice pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 19:19:10 GMT -5
So who is going to bash my Davis Webb pick? Bring it on bitches.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Mar 26, 2017 19:49:37 GMT -5
Steelers are looking to move up in the third. I'll give up at least my fourth depending how high I can go and my target is still available. Hit me up with a PM if interested.
|
|
|
|
Post by maury77 on Mar 26, 2017 19:52:21 GMT -5
Lawson was a nice find at the bottom of round 2. Top 20 talent who drops because of his injury past.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 26, 2017 19:56:16 GMT -5
Lawson was a nice find at the bottom of round 2. Top 20 talent who drops because of his injury past. I agree. We talked about him as a potential robopick a little earlier, but went in a different direction. In this draft, just seems like anytime we need to make a robopick, we really can't go wrong taking a CB. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2017 20:03:05 GMT -5
Knew you were gonna take Mahommes. Tried to trade up with Carolina but he didn't see my message in time.
People in KC are talking about taking Mahommes with their first rounder.
|
|
