|
Post by tkasper01 on Oct 29, 2017 12:24:53 GMT -5
Do you feel this way when PBA Chief Lynch goes off? Mounts protests? See the cops as "crybabies"? And I would argue that in this specific case they have "sought attention" because so many black men were being shot. All they have done was mount a protest. A brief (length of the National Anthem) non-violent one at that. If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Black thugs are more deadly to the black community then any other force. Blacks literally do not give a shit about other blacks.
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Oct 29, 2017 13:08:35 GMT -5
If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Black thugs are more deadly to the black community then any other force. Blacks literally do not give a shit about other blacks. First statement is true, second is a generalization.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Oct 29, 2017 13:57:54 GMT -5
If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Black thugs are more deadly to the black community then any other force. Blacks literally do not give a shit about other blacks. Well that just sounds racist. I am literarily taking a knee right now in my family room. _
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 16:35:48 GMT -5
Do you feel this way when PBA Chief Lynch goes off? Mounts protests? See the cops as "crybabies"? And I would argue that in this specific case they have "sought attention" because so many black men were being shot. All they have done was mount a protest. A brief (length of the National Anthem) non-violent one at that. If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Compliments on your post. I was not trying to be anti-police. The problem is that there were so many recent (horrific) shootings of black men (some unarmed; some just sitting in cars all senseless) by a small percentage of cops who skewed the issue. For the record, I think Lynch is a genius at using stunning visuals to frame his argument/protest as well as creating controversy and media attention. Also a great, compelling speaker in front of a crowd. Hundreds of men in blue turning their backs on DeBlasio was as powerful a visual as I've ever seen. Not sure if he truly understood its significance, but Kaepernick kneeling was equally formidable. Folks had to react. Take notice. Like Lynch, and so many others before him, Kaep used a public platform to make his point. You can agree or not. But they are both sides of the same coin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 16:41:10 GMT -5
Sorry, went down to finish my dough and other prep for Sicilian pizza tonight. Your post the other day inspired me. Guess I'm not sure why you're so happy about this. Trump changed the argument. It was never about the flag, or anthem, or the military. Just about perceived abuses by the police. Not "white" police, but police in general, as several of these shootings were by non-white officers. No player pissed on the flag or burned it, which as you know is still protected in America. They just kneeled. What's the big fucking deal? Having gone through the 60s, we've seen much more reactionary, if not entirely disrespectful and violent, protests. He didn't have the intellect or aplomb to contribute to the argument so he changed the parameters. I wish he had that amount of passion and vociferous effort against the insect white supremacists in Charlottesville. But sadly, he could not muster up such courage to denounce pieces of shit chanting blood and soil/Jews will not replace us on American soil. Just against Apple pie players. Talk about desecrating the flag and the memories of all the brave military men and Apple pie who fought and/or died in WWII against scumbag Nazis. Ok this is YOUR interpretation. Kaep never clarified what his "issue" was even when given the chance. I still don't think he knows what his original position was. The rest of these aren't taking a knee because of cops shooting unarmed black men, they are taking a knee because they hate Trump and are using the guise of "systematic racism" against all blacks in this country. You know, the same "systematic racism" that existed for EIGHT YEARS during a black presidency yet apparently it wasn't bad enough for multi-millionaires to protest against. Ferguson didn't happen on Trump's watch, it happened on Obama's watch. It's only now that they hate this guy so much that, like dumb fuck sheep, they are driven to "protest". How about some of these black multimillionaires spend some of their money on schools and inner city programs and infrastructure to help out the down trodden. Or just sit on their $10,000 sofas and drink Crystal and not really give a shit. Oh and one other thing, I was taught to stand at attention, , hat off, hand over heart and sing the National Anthem. But standing silently works as well. In my humble opinion, anything short of standing silently when the flag is raised and the Anthem is being played is pissing or shitting on the flag. That's just me. And again I'm happy Trump is calling out these low IQ fraudulent shitbags. Somebody needs to. _ I agree that it is my interpretation. I'll stand by my opinion. As that's all it is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 16:46:22 GMT -5
JS: I finally found what I was looking for earlier. Kaep did specify why he was kneeling/protesting. Again, it was in response to (his perception or otherwise) the spate of shootings we all saw on TV for those few weeks. SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has willingly immersed himself into controversy by refusing to stand for the playing of the national anthem in protest of what he deems are wrongdoings against African Americans and minorities in the United States.
His latest refusal to stand for the anthem -- he has done this in at least one other preseason game -- came before the 49ers' preseason loss to Green Bay at Levi's Stadium on Friday night.
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder." www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691077/article/colin-kaepernick-explains-why-he-sat-during-national-anthem
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Oct 29, 2017 17:07:10 GMT -5
JS: I finally found what I was looking for earlier. Kaep did specify why he was kneeling/protesting. Again, it was in response to (his perception or otherwise) the spate of shootings we all saw on TV for those few weeks. SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has willingly immersed himself into controversy by refusing to stand for the playing of the national anthem in protest of what he deems are wrongdoings against African Americans and minorities in the United States.
His latest refusal to stand for the anthem -- he has done this in at least one other preseason game -- came before the 49ers' preseason loss to Green Bay at Levi's Stadium on Friday night.
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than Apple pie and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder." www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691077/article/colin-kaepernick-explains-why-he-sat-during-national-anthemAll said wearing a shirt with Che Guevara on it honoring a horrible killer who helped oppress an entire nation and dooming them to still live in the 1950s which is what the left accuses the right of wanting to return to. Irony.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Oct 29, 2017 17:10:12 GMT -5
JS: I finally found what I was looking for earlier. Kaep did specify why he was kneeling/protesting. Again, it was in response to (his perception or otherwise) the spate of shootings we all saw on TV for those few weeks. SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has willingly immersed himself into controversy by refusing to stand for the playing of the national anthem in protest of what he deems are wrongdoings against African Americans and minorities in the United States.
His latest refusal to stand for the anthem -- he has done this in at least one other preseason game -- came before the 49ers' preseason loss to Green Bay at Levi's Stadium on Friday night.
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than Apple pie and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder." www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691077/article/colin-kaepernick-explains-why-he-sat-during-national-anthemThat's generalization pablum. The guy's a fucking moron. Explain to me what he's protesting. Seriously. Explain it in small words so I can understand. Because I don't. What changed in November or February. Explain it. And then explain to me what these fucking morons are clinging onto. Is it white cops shooting unarmed blacks whic has been disproven massively. Or is it Blacks bring systematically being oppressed by slavemasters. Which is it? _
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Oct 29, 2017 17:12:17 GMT -5
JS: I finally found what I was looking for earlier. Kaep did specify why he was kneeling/protesting. Again, it was in response to (his perception or otherwise) the spate of shootings we all saw on TV for those few weeks. SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has willingly immersed himself into controversy by refusing to stand for the playing of the national anthem in protest of what he deems are wrongdoings against African Americans and minorities in the United States.
His latest refusal to stand for the anthem -- he has done this in at least one other preseason game -- came before the 49ers' preseason loss to Green Bay at Levi's Stadium on Friday night.
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than Apple pie and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder." www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691077/article/colin-kaepernick-explains-why-he-sat-during-national-anthemAll said wearing a shirt with Che Guevara on it honoring a horrible killer who helped oppress an entire nation and dooming them to still live in the 1950s which is what the left accuses the right of wanting to return to. Irony. He likely had no fucking idea who Che was like he had no fucking idea what he was protesting. Like he had no idea what pig socks meant. Fuck that piece of shit and I hope he never works again. _
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Oct 29, 2017 17:17:47 GMT -5
Black thugs are more deadly to the black community then any other force. Blacks literally do not give a shit about other blacks. Well that just sounds racist. I am literarily taking a knee right now in my family room. _ You just can't handle the truth. Lefty. :-)
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Oct 29, 2017 17:29:08 GMT -5
Well that just sounds racist. I am literarily taking a knee right now in my family room. _ You just can't handle the truth. Lefty. :-) How about posting a petite naked hottie you slacker. _
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Oct 29, 2017 18:20:34 GMT -5
If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Compliments on your post. I was not trying to be anti-police. The problem is that there were so many recent (horrific) shootings of black men (some unarmed; some just sitting in cars all senseless) by a small percentage of cops who skewed the issue. For the record, I think Lynch is a genius at using stunning visuals to frame his argument/protest as well as creating controversy and media attention. Also a great, compelling speaker in front of a crowd. Hundreds of men in blue turning their backs on DeBlasio was as powerful a visual as I've ever seen. Not sure if he truly understood its significance, but Kaepernick kneeling was equally formidable. Folks had to react. Take notice. Like Lynch, and so many others before him, Kaep used a public platform to make his point. You can agree or not. But they are both sides of the same coin. Fair enough, agree to disagree. You have a good heart and are well-intentioned.
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Oct 29, 2017 18:34:38 GMT -5
Below is "A" reason of many, that so many are disgusted by the NFL's inaction in dealing with kneeling (which is clearly verboten as per the NFL's own policy.)
Saints’ Fats Domino tribute OK, but Cowboys’ tribute to fallen officers? Nah. BY STEFAN STEVENSON
OCTOBER 29, 2017 2:48 PM
So let’s get this straight. The NFL is cool with one of its teams paying tribute to a musical icon but isn’t on board with paying tribute to fallen police officers?
SMH.
The New Orleans Saints paid tribute to New Orleans native Fats Domino with “FATS” decals on the back of their helmets during Sunday’s game against the Bears. Domino passed away on Tuesday at age 89.
It’s not clear if the Saints just made the executive decision without going through the NFL. If that’s what they did, more power to them.
When the Cowboys went through the proper league channels to receive permission to wear “Arm In Arm” decals in August 2016 the NFL denied the request.
The “Arm in Arm” decals were supposed to promote unity between members of the Dallas community and its police officers in the wake of the death of five officers during a mass shooting in downtown Dallas in July 2016.
Perhaps the Saints just went rogue to honor a hometown rock and roll icon. That is cool. Maybe when Willie Nelson leaves us — and let’s hope it’s not for a very long time — the Cowboys will just go with their gut and bypass the NFL.
Jerry Jones can afford the fine.
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Oct 29, 2017 18:36:37 GMT -5
If a cop goes into work carrying a sign complaining about something, he will be disciplined. He has to do it on his own time. Protests are done off-duty. The players have the same right...yet they choose to do it while being paid in the company uniform, against NFL Bylaws, which the owners are too cowardly to enforce. Your example is simply not comparable. Friend, you have bought the false narrative. Below you will find a brief synopsis why the "black men being shot" is utter nonsense. If the fact that Colin K, the instigator of this whole charade, appeared on the practice field wearing socks depicting cops as pigs should have clued you in. Most informed, unbiased people know that this whole thing is based on falsehoods and rank exaggerations that mask the real truth; The real enemy of black folks are liberals, the Democratic machine and the racial arsonists whom all thrive on the continued dysfunction of the black community...and the cops are stuck in the middle. The flash-point whenever it goes bad...but no-one asks why are their still kids hanging on corners with no fathers in their home, angry, dependent on the state, conditioned victims destined to interact with the cops in a bad way. 50+ years of this. These players are tilting at windmills while the real reason their communities are a fucking disaster goes un-examined. www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#Here are five key statistics you need to know about cops killing blacks. (Yes its from the Daily Wire, but its an accurate summation of a Heather McDonald piece. Look her up, a solid, unbiased, well respected journalist) 1. Cops killed nearly twice as many whites as blacks in 2015. According to data compiled by The Washington Post, 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black. The majority of these victims had a gun or "were armed or otherwise threatening the officer with potentially lethal force," according to Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College. Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 13 percent of the population. But as Mac Donald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties. "Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald. MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population. "The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods." 2. More whites and Hispanics die from police homicides than blacks. According to Mac Donald, 12 percent of white and Hispanic homicide deaths were due to police officers, while only four percent of black homicide deaths were the result of police officers. "If we’re going to have a 'Lives Matter' anti-police movement, it would be more appropriately named "White and Hispanic Lives Matter,'" said Mac Donald in her Hillsdale speech. 3. The Post's data does show that unarmed black men are more likely to die by the gun of a cop than an unarmed white man...but this does not tell the whole story. In August 2015, the ratio was seven-to-one of unarmed black men dying from police gunshots compared to unarmed white men; the ratio was six-to-one by the end of 2015. But Mac Donald points out in The Marshall Project that looking at the details of the actual incidents that occurred paints a different picture: The “unarmed” label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Post’s “unarmed black victims” category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths. In one of those unintended cases, an undercover cop from the New York Police Department was conducting a gun sting in Mount Vernon, just north of New York City. One of the gun traffickers jumped into the cop’s car, stuck a pistol to his head, grabbed $2,400 and fled. The officer gave chase and opened fire after the thief again pointed his gun at him. Two of the officer’s bullets accidentally hit a 61-year-old bystander, killing him. That older man happened to be black, but his race had nothing to do with his tragic death. In the other collateral damage case, Virginia Beach, Virginia, officers approached a car parked at a convenience store that had a homicide suspect in the passenger seat. The suspect opened fire, sending a bullet through an officer’s shirt. The cops returned fire, killing their assailant as well as a woman in the driver’s seat. That woman entered the Post’s database without qualification as an “unarmed black victim” of police fire. Mac Donald examines a number of other instances, including unarmed black men in San Diego, CA and Prince George's County, MD attempting to reach for a gun in a police officer's holster. In the San Diego case, the unarmed black man actually "jumped the officer" and assaulted him, and the cop shot the man since he was "fearing for his life." MacDonald also notes that there was an instance in 2015 where "three officers were killed with their own guns, which the suspects had wrestled from them." 4. Black and Hispanic police officers are more likely to fire a gun at blacks than white officers. This is according to a Department of Justice report in 2015 about the Philadelphia Police Department, and is further confirmed that by a study conducted University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway in 2015 that determined black cops were 3.3 times more likely to fire a gun than other cops at a crime scene. 5. Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person. Despite the facts, the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and their leftist sympathizers have resulted in what Mac Donald calls the "Ferguson Effect," as murders have spiked by 17 percent among the 50 biggest cities in the U.S. as a result of cops being more reluctant to police neighborhoods out of fear of being labeled as racists. Additionally, there have been over twice as many cops victimized by fatal shootings in the first three months of 2016. Anti-police rhetoric has deadly consequences. Compliments on your post. I was not trying to be anti-police. The problem is that there were so many recent (horrific) shootings of black men (some unarmed; some just sitting in cars all senseless) by a small percentage of cops who skewed the issue. For the record, I think Lynch is a genius at using stunning visuals to frame his argument/protest as well as creating controversy and media attention. Also a great, compelling speaker in front of a crowd. Hundreds of men in blue turning their backs on DeBlasio was as powerful a visual as I've ever seen. Not sure if he truly understood its significance, but Kaepernick kneeling was equally formidable. Folks had to react. Take notice. Like Lynch, and so many others before him, Kaep used a public platform to make his point. You can agree or not. But they are both sides of the same coin. Kaep doesn't even understand his point. It's not formidable if it has no basis. The reaction was simply....a reaction to something that sounded cool, hip, militant yeah 'fuck the man'. His protest was infantile. _
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Oct 29, 2017 19:46:06 GMT -5
Compliments on your post. I was not trying to be anti-police. The problem is that there were so many recent (horrific) shootings of black men (some unarmed; some just sitting in cars all senseless) by a small percentage of cops who skewed the issue. For the record, I think Lynch is a genius at using stunning visuals to frame his argument/protest as well as creating controversy and media attention. Also a great, compelling speaker in front of a crowd. Hundreds of men in blue turning their backs on DeBlasio was as powerful a visual as I've ever seen. Not sure if he truly understood its significance, but Kaepernick kneeling was equally formidable. Folks had to react. Take notice. Like Lynch, and so many others before him, Kaep used a public platform to make his point. You can agree or not. But they are both sides of the same coin. Kaep doesn't even understand his point. It's not formidable if it has no basis. The reaction was simply....a reaction to something that sounded cool, hip, militant yeah 'fuck the man'. His protest was infantile. _ Kaep is basically a soft white guy. He starts going out with a Muslim chick with a racial agenda...but he's got no street cred. What to do. Oh yeah...become a social justice warrior to disguise the fact he was raised by white folks because his black father took off and his birth mother gave him up. People see this. They are not stupid. No one is advocating unarmed black men being shot by the cops, but it is (as the FBI's own stats show) not the norm and not a trend...we see the ones that the media hypes because it sells clicks. I'd be more impressed if Kaep addressed the real causes of death and dysfunction in minority communities. It aint the cops and it aint conservatives. Its the folks reaping Democratic votes from the Democratic plantation.
|
|