|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jan 10, 2018 17:30:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Jan 10, 2018 17:31:41 GMT -5
Politics aside, the Clinton Foundation (and CGI) was primarily a way to provide paying jobs to a retinue of insiders when the Clintons were out of power. It had the added benefit of being a vehicle donors could freely (unlimitedly) give to to curry favor and the Clintons could dole from (as in Haiti) to reward donors (with contracts or jobs). It also kept them plugged into the heavily overlapped worlds of large$ charity donors and large$ campaign donors.
If there is any doubt, once her candidacy ended, donations to the CF dropped from 178$M to 108$M y-o-y.
And demand for her paid speeches sure dried up quick - dropping from 3.6M to $360,000.
Whatever it's rating might be, CF is a joke of a charity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jetworks on Jan 10, 2018 21:30:00 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? |
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Jan 10, 2018 22:23:35 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? Frank can care less. _ |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 10, 2018 23:21:01 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? Why would stephen hawking care about the financials of the clinton foundation? I'm not sure why anyone here really cares at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 10, 2018 23:21:17 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? Frank can care less. _ So i care a little? |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jan 11, 2018 8:45:49 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? Why would stephen hawking care about the financials of the clinton foundation? I'm not sure why anyone here really cares at this point. This country is founded on the rule of law for everyone. Just because Hillary lost, even when it was her turn, she should still have to follow the same rules as the rest of us. We know the liberal talking point is to leave her alone but that's not how it works. |
|
|
|
Post by Jetworks on Jan 11, 2018 8:49:03 GMT -5
What if Stephen Hawking was the source? Would you shut up and listen then? Why would stephen hawking care about the financials of the clinton foundation? I'm not sure why anyone here really cares at this point. Doesn't matter, he's a genius. I'd like to think anything he'd speak about would be backed up by facts. Good point. Why should anyone care where millions of dollars 'donated' were funneled, especially when a Senator/SoS/Presidential candidate was at the center of it? Makes all those OWS dopes seem a bit more dopey too, for protesting corporate malfeasance. Fuck, let's just bring back the Robber Barons, Frank says we shouldn't care. Live and let live, he says!!! |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jan 11, 2018 9:19:35 GMT -5
You really do love Hillary Clinton. It’s actually sickening the depth of your twisted affection for a fat gross man hating feminist two time loser. Always wondered about men who supported that disgusting witch. Weirdo, |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 11, 2018 10:34:50 GMT -5
Why would stephen hawking care about the financials of the clinton foundation? I'm not sure why anyone here really cares at this point. Doesn't matter, he's a genius. I'd like to think anything he'd speak about would be backed up by facts. Good point. Why should anyone care where millions of dollars 'donated' were funneled, especially when a Senator/SoS/Presidential candidate was at the center of it? Makes all those OWS dopes seem a bit more dopey too, for protesting corporate malfeasance. Fuck, let's just bring back the Robber Barons, Frank says we shouldn't care. Live and let live, he says!!! Not at all what I'm saying. If someone broke the law, they should pay the consequences. I'm just wondering why you and all the other internet detectives care about this case, right now, more than any other crime. Don't worry though. Trump promised you guys he'd hire a special prosecutor to look into her situation. I'm sure he'll get around to it one of these days. Until then, you guys keep working on cracking the case. |
|
|
|
Post by JStokes on Jan 11, 2018 13:02:28 GMT -5
Doesn't matter, he's a genius. I'd like to think anything he'd speak about would be backed up by facts. Good point. Why should anyone care where millions of dollars 'donated' were funneled, especially when a Senator/SoS/Presidential candidate was at the center of it? Makes all those OWS dopes seem a bit more dopey too, for protesting corporate malfeasance. Fuck, let's just bring back the Robber Barons, Frank says we shouldn't care. Live and let live, he says!!! Not at all what I'm saying. If someone broke the law, they should pay the consequences. I'm just wondering why you and all the other internet detectives care about this case, right now, more than any other crime. Don't worry though. Trump promised you guys he'd hire a special prosecutor to look into her situation. I'm sure he'll get around to it one of these days. Until then, you guys keep working on cracking the case. You understand that people can multitask? We can be internet sleuths on this matter but it doesn’t mean we still can’t shit all over Stephen Hawkings and Mike McCagnan at the same time. Whilst drinking a beer. Why is it Libs always say “aren’t there more important things XXX could be doing” as if that one task takes up all of that individual’s time, and they don’t have folks to delegate shit to. We want all the good stuff but we also want this smelly thundercunt and her rapist husband punished to the fullest extent of the law. _ |
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Jan 16, 2018 14:12:17 GMT -5
The guy got his numbers from the CFs tax return. What are you disputing? Why do you have a problem with exposing their corrupt practices? Because they're most likely bullshit numbers from a bullshit sources. Some moron in his mom's basement with a blog. They're not worth anyone's time to even check. The links i posted from actual credible sources have all the financial numbers you'd need to check if that's something you're interested in doing. That's up to you if you want to. Reading shit like powderwigsociety.com is just internet nonsense like pizzagate. It's for the extremely gullible and not worth anyone's time. so you're saying the people of Haiti hate the Clintons for no good reason? And you're saying they're shithole-dwellers. awful Frank - really. At least I didn't think you were better than this, so there's that. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 16, 2018 15:05:24 GMT -5
Why would stephen hawking care about the financials of the clinton foundation? I'm not sure why anyone here really cares at this point. This country is founded on the rule of law for everyone. Just because Hillary lost, even when it was her turn, she should still have to follow the same rules as the rest of us. We know the liberal talking point is to leave her alone but that's not how it works. Ok, not what i'm saying at all. I'm just wondering why you guys care. She's nothing at this point. She's just a private citizen like everyone else. Let law enforcement and trump's special prosecutor that he promised to assign to the case to deal with this. Personally, I'm almost as sick as hearing about Hillary Clinton as i am about Trump. Almost. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Jan 16, 2018 15:08:42 GMT -5
Because they're most likely bullshit numbers from a bullshit sources. Some moron in his mom's basement with a blog. They're not worth anyone's time to even check. The links i posted from actual credible sources have all the financial numbers you'd need to check if that's something you're interested in doing. That's up to you if you want to. Reading shit like powderwigsociety.com is just internet nonsense like pizzagate. It's for the extremely gullible and not worth anyone's time. so you're saying the people of Haiti hate the Clintons for no good reason? And you're saying they're shithole-dwellers. awful Frank - really. At least I didn't think you were better than this, so there's that. That's what you got from that statement? |
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Jan 16, 2018 16:10:59 GMT -5
Politics aside, the Clinton Foundation (and CGI) was primarily a way to provide paying jobs to a retinue of insiders when the Clintons were out of power. It had the added benefit of being a vehicle donors could freely (unlimitedly) give to to curry favor and the Clintons could dole from (as in Haiti) to reward donors (with contracts or jobs). It also kept them plugged into the heavily overlapped worlds of large$ charity donors and large$ campaign donors. If there is any doubt, once her candidacy ended, donations to the CF dropped from 178$M to 108$M y-o-y. And demand for her paid speeches sure dried up quick - dropping from 3.6M to $360,000. Whatever it's rating might be, CF is a joke of a charity. she was paid 3.6 million for a speech?... |
|
