|
|
Post by Jets Things on Feb 14, 2018 20:41:06 GMT -5
If banging Stormy Daniels makes Trump a low life - well, that one is worth it in my book.. I don't think the banging a porn star part is the issue. It's the banging a porn star right after your third wife has a baby, and paying her off to keep her mouth shut, while completely denying it ever happened, while hypocritically killing bill clinton for womanizing at the same time, that makes him look like the lowlife that he is. That's a nice euphemism for rape and fathering children out of wedlock. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 14, 2018 20:47:34 GMT -5
I don't think the banging a porn star part is the issue. It's the banging a porn star right after your third wife has a baby, and paying her off to keep her mouth shut, while completely denying it ever happened, while hypocritically killing bill clinton for womanizing at the same time, that makes him look like the lowlife that he is. That's a nice euphemism for rape and fathering children out of wedlock. I don't remember clinton ever being found guilty or even charged with rape. If you're talking about lewinsky, i always figured she was a willing participant in what happened between her and the president. At least as willing as the porn star trump was banging. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 14, 2018 20:49:41 GMT -5
What are you waiting for me to say? You want me to acknowledge that you read some nonsense on the internet? Well, ok, i'm sure you read obama is gay somewhere on the internet. And we all know you can't lie on the internet. Did you do the google search? I did. What's the problem? Am i missing something? |
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 14, 2018 20:51:15 GMT -5
That's a nice euphemism for rape and fathering children out of wedlock. I don't remember clinton ever being found guilty or even charged with rape. If you're talking about lewinsky, i always figured she was a willing participant in what happened between her and the president. At least as willing as the porn star trump was banging. I have a question. Are you intentionally obtuse and ignorant when it comes to these sickos? Why the loyalty to the C's? I'm genuinely curious. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 14, 2018 20:54:35 GMT -5
I don't remember clinton ever being found guilty or even charged with rape. If you're talking about lewinsky, i always figured she was a willing participant in what happened between her and the president. At least as willing as the porn star trump was banging. I have a question. Are you intentionally obtuse and ignorant when it comes to these sickos? Why the loyalty to the C's? I'm genuinely curious. What did i say that was incorrect? I'm talking strictly on proven facts, not internet garbage hearsay. And i don't even want to talk about the clintons. They're irrelevant right now. It's just the first thing anyone ever brings up when deflecting something trump said or did. It's either the clintons or obama every time. "Yeah, but obama" or "yeah, but hillary/bill..." |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Feb 14, 2018 21:01:42 GMT -5
Did you do the google search? I did. What's the problem? Am i missing something? LOl the fuck you did. You laugh at the article I posted because of the source, totally ignoring that one victims mother works for the CPD. How many examples in the fake news thread have been posted where CNN, the Ny times etc have altered or flat out deleted articles or news videos? At least five guys have come forward saying they had sex with Obama, you really have to search hard to find examples. Now contrast that with the coverage trumps affairs get. Just admit that the deck is stacked against Trump by the MSM and all social media platforms, then we can have an honest conversation. By the way, tell me what you saw when you set google to images, and typed in American inventors. You really don't notice anything unusual? |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 14, 2018 21:07:49 GMT -5
I did. What's the problem? Am i missing something? LOl the fuck you did. You laugh at the article I posted because of the source, totally ignoring that one victims mother works for the CPD. How many examples in the fake news thread have been posted where CNN, the Ny times etc have altered or flat out deleted articles or news videos? At least five guys have come forward saying they had sex with Obama, you really have to search hard to find examples. Now contrast that with the coverage trumps affairs get. Just admit that the deck is stacked against Trump by the MSM and all social media platforms, then we can have an honest conversation. By the way, tell me what you saw when you set google to images, and typed in American inventors. You really don't notice anything unusual? No question the mainstream media, outside of fauxnews, is biased against trump. I've never denied that. He also provides them with plenty of ammunition though. This past year has been a circus. But yeah, they're definitely out for him. But they're out for ratings and trump equals ratings. And I see a lot of black inventors. What's the issue? Is google racist against white people or something? What happens when you google cracker? I really hope it's not a bunch of white inventors. |
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 14, 2018 21:15:34 GMT -5
I have a question. Are you intentionally obtuse and ignorant when it comes to these sickos? Why the loyalty to the C's? I'm genuinely curious. What did i say that was incorrect? I'm talking strictly on proven facts, not internet garbage hearsay. And i don't even want to talk about the clintons. They're irrelevant right now. It's just the first thing anyone ever brings up when deflecting something trump said or did. It's either the clintons or obama every time. "Yeah, but obama" or "yeah, but hillary/bill..." The only problem with that is the Clintons are COMPLETELY relevant to the situation and the "outrage" |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Feb 14, 2018 21:23:19 GMT -5
What did i say that was incorrect? I'm talking strictly on proven facts, not internet garbage hearsay. And i don't even want to talk about the clintons. They're irrelevant right now. It's just the first thing anyone ever brings up when deflecting something trump said or did. It's either the clintons or obama every time. "Yeah, but obama" or "yeah, but hillary/bill..." The only problem with that is the Clintons are COMPLETELY relevant to the situation and the "outrage" You're right, they are. You guys should be just as outraged at the current president as you were with Bill Clinton when he get impeached for lying and covering up what he did. |
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 14, 2018 21:29:28 GMT -5
The only problem with that is the Clintons are COMPLETELY relevant to the situation and the "outrage" You're right, they are. You guys should be just as outraged at the current president as you were with Bill Clinton when he get impeached for lying and covering up what he did. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Feb 14, 2018 22:20:31 GMT -5
LOl the fuck you did. You laugh at the article I posted because of the source, totally ignoring that one victims mother works for the CPD. How many examples in the fake news thread have been posted where CNN, the Ny times etc have altered or flat out deleted articles or news videos? At least five guys have come forward saying they had sex with Obama, you really have to search hard to find examples. Now contrast that with the coverage trumps affairs get. Just admit that the deck is stacked against Trump by the MSM and all social media platforms, then we can have an honest conversation. By the way, tell me what you saw when you set google to images, and typed in American inventors. You really don't notice anything unusual? No question the mainstream media, outside of fauxnews, is biased against trump. I've never denied that. He also provides them with plenty of ammunition though. This past year has been a circus. But yeah, they're definitely out for him. But they're out for ratings and trump equals ratings. And I see a lot of black inventors. What's the issue? Is google racist against white people or something? What happens when you google cracker? I really hope it's not a bunch of white inventors. It's not just Trump, all of the MSM news outlets have a SJW liberal agenda. All social media too. Google was notified about the American inventors thing and chose to do nothing. I don't know if what Google is doing is racist, but it's definately misleading. They tune their search engines to get results that favor the results they want. |
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Feb 14, 2018 22:43:58 GMT -5
I think their trying to go the whole illegal campaign contribution route with this. Like everything else, it will end up nowhere. Seems to me like payback for Bill Clinton. Just like the whole thing with Porter last week was the Deep State payback over releasing the memo. Comey's coffee boy gets hired by CNN and all of sudden we start hearing about security clearances.
A lot of us came to terms with that we werent voting for who we wanted to be our son-in-law. So this stuff is baked-in. If they were smart the liberal propaganda MSM would have picked up on that now. Maybe they are trying to hurt him with evangelicals. Good luck bc at the end of the day the MSM and left support murdering 9 month-old fetuses.
There is only one thing that will get his base to turn on him. Immigration. He broke the blue wall with immigration. Whatever deal they make better close the door. We cant afford another Reagan immigration debacle. Yes, as great as Reagan was he fucked conservatives on immigration and loss California forever. Part of his legacy.
|
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Feb 15, 2018 11:19:06 GMT -5
It least she’s not a 19 year old intern and he did before he was pres. How many of us would not hit that? Properly wrapped up of course. Not if I gotta pay 130K. meh - to a millionaire, 130k is chump change She does have an impressive rack! That's 65k/per boob and you get the punani for free! |
|
|
|
Post by BushytheLobster on Feb 15, 2018 11:28:14 GMT -5
meh - to a millionaire, 130k is chump change She does have an impressive rack! That's 65k/per boob and you get the punani for free! That rack is as real as the Donald's hair. |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Feb 15, 2018 12:00:35 GMT -5
meh - to a millionaire, 130k is chump change She does have an impressive rack! That's 65k/per boob and you get the punani for free! That rack is as real as the Donald's hair. Like you wouldn't make sweet sweet love to The Donald's hair. |
|
