|
|
Post by quantum on Jun 10, 2019 14:31:27 GMT -5
this blithering jerkoff redefines beta-male. what a cluelessly pandering tool. eminently punchable face to boot. how the fuck does this tool think he has a shot? dems need to thin the herd of these fucking loons, or guilt by association is going to doom whomever gets the nod. they won't decimate each other in the debates; it's going to be a hand-holding exercise on beating trump
i think the Dim debates will be a bloodbath. they all figure whoever gets the nomination will coast into the White House. LOL - just like Cankles! |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jun 10, 2019 16:27:05 GMT -5
this blithering jerkoff redefines beta-male. what a cluelessly pandering tool. eminently punchable face to boot. how the fuck does this tool think he has a shot? dems need to thin the herd of these fucking loons, or guilt by association is going to doom whomever gets the nod. they won't decimate each other in the debates; it's going to be a hand-holding exercise on beating trump
i think the Dim debates will be a bloodbath. they all figure whoever gets the nomination will coast into the White House. LOL - just like Cankles! Hillary still hasn't ruled out running. Like she's gonna swoop in and save the DNC. |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jun 10, 2019 17:14:59 GMT -5
this blithering jerkoff redefines beta-male. what a cluelessly pandering tool. eminently punchable face to boot. how the fuck does this tool think he has a shot? dems need to thin the herd of these fucking loons, or guilt by association is going to doom whomever gets the nod. they won't decimate each other in the debates; it's going to be a hand-holding exercise on beating trump
i think the Dim debates will be a bloodbath. they all figure whoever gets the nomination will coast into the White House. LOL - just like Cankles! They are already starting to turn on one another and there’s still like 9 months before the Iowa caucus. Sit back, grab some popcorn and beer and watch the utter pathetic pandering clown car show that these numb nut brain dead losers will engage in. |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 11, 2019 12:31:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 11, 2019 13:18:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Jun 11, 2019 13:36:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by shakin on Jun 11, 2019 13:50:02 GMT -5
suck my dick kirsten
with your swinging puppies hanging out
with all due respect
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 15:04:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jun 11, 2019 18:16:20 GMT -5
Trump just had a rally in Iowa where thousands of people attended today. This was supposed to be Biden’s big trump smack down rally. They even leaked the speech last nite because everyone knew Biden would stumble, bumble and mumble half the fucking thing and the 10 people and 10 cows that showed up wouldn’t be able to understand the old bastard’s speech. Biden has only been doing a limited amount of events because no one shows up. Even democrats have admitted that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 20:10:59 GMT -5
Trump just had a rally in Iowa where thousands of people attended today. This was supposed to be Biden’s big trump smack down rally. They even leaked the speech last nite because everyone knew Biden would stumble, bumble and mumble half the fucking thing and the 10 people and 10 cows that showed up wouldn’t be able to understand the old bastard’s speech. Biden has only been doing a limited amount of events because no one shows up. Even democrats have admitted that. Eh the last way you want to judge is by popularity. |
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jun 11, 2019 20:32:56 GMT -5
Trump just had a rally in Iowa where thousands of people attended today. This was supposed to be Biden’s big trump smack down rally. They even leaked the speech last nite because everyone knew Biden would stumble, bumble and mumble half the fucking thing and the 10 people and 10 cows that showed up wouldn’t be able to understand the old bastard’s speech. Biden has only been doing a limited amount of events because no one shows up. Even democrats have admitted that. Eh the last way you want to judge is by popularity. Yes, no liberal wants to vote for a candidate based on popularity 🙄 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 20:43:46 GMT -5
Eh the last way you want to judge is by popularity. Yes, no liberal wants to vote for a candidate based on popularity 🙄 There’d be no Trump if done by the popular vote, jackass. |
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Jun 11, 2019 20:48:48 GMT -5
Trump just had a rally in Iowa where thousands of people attended today. This was supposed to be Biden’s big trump smack down rally. They even leaked the speech last nite because everyone knew Biden would stumble, bumble and mumble half the fucking thing and the 10 people and 10 cows that showed up wouldn’t be able to understand the old bastard’s speech. Biden has only been doing a limited amount of events because no one shows up. Even democrats have admitted that. Eh the last way you want to judge is by popularity. Tell that to Harry Truman. Read a book about him a few years ago and that’s the main reason he knew he’d beat Dewey, despite the polls, in the famous “Dewey Defeats Truman” election of 1948. It was also the way that I (and others) knew Trump had a good chance to defeat the evil blubbery feminist witch in 2016. Truman was drawing big crowds on his whistle stop train tour (while Dewey was drawing Biden like crowds) and Trump was drawing huge overflowing crowds to his events in 2016 (and still does), while Hilary had 16 people show up for her events (unless she had Hussein Obama and Jay Z). History has shown crowd size has been a pretty good indicator of electoral success, while the polls continue to get it wrong. It’s not about popularity, it’s about the fact that if thousands show up to hear you speak, those same people will walk through hot coals in a blizzard to vote for you no matter what. Hillary? Biden? People would rather sit back and watch the price is right then get off their fat ass to cast a vote for those boring old coots. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 21:02:16 GMT -5
Eh the last way you want to judge is by popularity. Tell that to Harry Truman. Read a book about him a few years ago and that’s the main reason he knew he’d beat Dewey, despite the polls, in the famous “Dewey Defeats Truman” election of 1948. It was also the way that I (and others) knew Trump had a good chance to defeat the evil blubbery feminist witch in 2016. Truman was drawing big crowds on his whistle stop train tour and Trump was drawing huge overflowing crowds to his events in 2016 (and still does), while Hilary had 16 people show up for her events (unless she had Hussein Obama and Jay Z). History has shown crowd size has been a pretty good indicator of electoral success, while the polls continue to get it wrong. Wow you really went out on a limb because we have had so many women serve as our President. Not just anyone can get Scott Baio. |
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jun 11, 2019 21:03:10 GMT -5
Yes, no liberal wants to vote for a candidate based on popularity 🙄 There’d be no Trump if done by the popular vote, jackass. No one could possibly know that, jackass. Conservative voters in blue states and stupid liberals in red states could/would cast their votes and it'd be a big game of "we'll see." To say otherwise is dumb. But...well, we know where you stand. |
|
