|
Post by rangerous on Jan 19, 2015 21:54:14 GMT -5
if the football inflation allegations are true then the patsies should be forced to forfeit the game. it doesn't matter if the cols were overmatched. the thing is the nfl is such a close place where any team can win on any given sunday. that the patsies have continued to win over such a long time speaks volumes about the way they have manipulated the rules and cheated to win. kraft knows he doesn't make a dime if the patsies fail. unlike the bigger markets, if he doesn't field a winning team he's toast. him and his dumaxzz patriots place all go in the hamper. so he is motivated to cheat more than any other owner. and screw him. he essentially set the jets back 5 years by trying to be woody's "friend". how's that working out now that he's leveling tampering charges against woody?
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on Jan 19, 2015 21:56:36 GMT -5
there is justice in this world if Seattle wins....... If not, I will once again lose faith in the whole'' what goes around come around'' theory.. I cant say how upset this has me, as other teams, as far as we know, do not engage in this kind of shit... Mother fucking cheating low life scum let's hope goodel has the sense to tilt the field in favor of the seahawks. won't be the first time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2015 22:32:37 GMT -5
A team going for a 2-pt conversion, fumbling to the other team, who then fumbles it back out of his own endzone for a 1-pt to the original trying team sounds awesome. You can't have the team defending against the conversion attempt obtain possession of the ball, a necessary condition before a fumble can occur, because once that team obtains possession the play is immediately dead. The one point safety only works on a kick where the kick is blocked by the defender who diverts the ball with his own kick, bat, or muff and the ball bounces out of bounds out of the back or sides of the end zone. (edit) Forget it, I get what you mean. Should apply to non-kick tries as well, imo. If a defender bounces it back out of his own EZ on a two-point attempt, it should still be 1 point.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jan 19, 2015 22:43:52 GMT -5
You can't have the team defending against the conversion attempt obtain possession of the ball, a necessary condition before a fumble can occur, because once that team obtains possession the play is immediately dead. The one point safety only works on a kick where the kick is blocked by the defender who diverts the ball with his own kick, bat, or muff and the ball bounces out of bounds out of the back or sides of the end zone. You just specifically listed a rule where the truly involves no kick. Read the approved ruling. Once the kicker makes contact with the ball with his foot there cannot be a one point safety. My explanation that you quoted should read that the kick attempt is blocked prior to the kicker making contact in a kicking fashion. In other words, either the placeholder fumbles the ball or a defender (miraculously) breaches the offensive line and is able to knock the ball before the placeholder can set it for the kicker and the ball is knocked out of bounds behind the goal line by the ball contact by the defender.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jan 19, 2015 22:52:04 GMT -5
You can't have the team defending against the conversion attempt obtain possession of the ball, a necessary condition before a fumble can occur, because once that team obtains possession the play is immediately dead. The one point safety only works on a kick where the kick is blocked by the defender who diverts the ball with his own kick, bat, or muff and the ball bounces out of bounds out of the back or sides of the end zone. (edit) Forget it, I get what you mean. Should apply to non-kick tries as well, imo. If a defender bounces it back out of his own EZ on a two-point attempt, it should still be 1 point. The way the rule is written certainly suggests that should be the rule but that creates strange issues where a defender blocks a pass on a two point attempt and the ball flies out of bounds and the offense still gets a point. If a team ever challenged the rule on that much more common scenario I believe the NFL would promptly issue a formal ruling that 11-3-2(d) is only intended for one point attempts. Maybe the pats will come out and challenge it in the super bowl.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 3:14:22 GMT -5
The Pats* have played in just over 1.6% of the NFL's Super Bowls. True story.
|
|
|
Post by Bing© in Buffalo Chairman on Jan 20, 2015 6:02:42 GMT -5
The Pats**** have played in just over 1.6% of the NFL's Super Bowls. True story. I think you forgot to move the decimal point bro...your number however does represent the number of Superbowls they got to without being cheating selfish fuckers.... I'm guessing you're not a Mensa member.
|
|
|
Post by Jets Things on Jan 20, 2015 7:39:15 GMT -5
The Pats**** have played in just over 1.6% of the NFL's Super Bowls. True story. I think you forgot to move the decimal point bro...your number however does represent the number of Superbowls they got to without being cheating selfish fuckers.... I'm guessing your not a Mensa member. *you're
|
|
|
Post by Bing© in Buffalo Chairman on Jan 20, 2015 7:47:40 GMT -5
I think you forgot to move the decimal point bro...your number however does represent the number of Superbowls they got to without being cheating selfish fuckers.... I'm guessing your not a Mensa member. *you're *Fucking auto correct*
|
|
|
Post by leftturn3 on Jan 20, 2015 8:08:42 GMT -5
Listen, NE handed the Colts their asses Sunday, witch that said, it makes it even more desterbing that your hear another incident of cheating. NE is a good enough team to win without cheating, you would think, so what is going on in their head that they feel this undesirable urge to cheat. As for the officials, even the announcers where making note of the O line for NE not being set and NE hiking the ball early, they where adimant that a flag should thrown, I think it is one sided and it does not have to be.
This is just another mark on NE, win or lose the SB, they just can't stop cheating.
I will say though, if luck does not stop looking for the home run on every passing play, espessially in that weather, he won't see a SB.
I am of the opinion that this was more than de-inflated balls, in that downpoor for NE to demolish the Colts that way, they knew what the Colts where doing the whole game, another words I am confident good ole cheating BB was listening in.
|
|
|
Post by nyjets1969 on Jan 20, 2015 12:50:27 GMT -5
How about they redo the game next Sunday that would be right thing to do
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 12:56:56 GMT -5
Listen, NE handed the Colts their asses Sunday, witch that said, it makes it even more desterbing that your hear another incident of cheating. NE is a good enough team to win without cheating, you would think, so what is going on in their head that they feel this undesirable urge to cheat. As for the officials, even the announcers where making note of the O line for NE not being set and NE hiking the ball early, they where adimant that a flag should thrown, I think it is one sided and it does not have to be. This is just another mark on NE, win or lose the SB, they just can't stop cheating. I will say though, if luck does not stop looking for the home run on every passing play, espessially in that weather, he won't see a SB. I am of the opinion that this was more than de-inflated balls, in that downpoor for NE to demolish the Colts that way, they knew what the Colts where doing the whole game, another words I am confident good ole cheating BB was listening in. Of course they knew what the Colts were doing the whole game. They knew it yesterday, they knew it the day before, they knew it a month ago. And they exploited the fuck out of it the same way they did the previous three games. Did you think the Colts had some fuckin great surprise? BB out-coached the fuck out of Pagano. I know it pains some of you to admit this, but it actually happened. Before your very eyes. Accept it.
|
|
|
Post by southside on Jan 20, 2015 13:05:48 GMT -5
Listen, NE handed the Colts their asses Sunday, witch that said, it makes it even more desterbing that your hear another incident of cheating. NE is a good enough team to win without cheating, you would think, so what is going on in their head that they feel this undesirable urge to cheat. As for the officials, even the announcers where making note of the O line for NE not being set and NE hiking the ball early, they where adimant that a flag should thrown, I think it is one sided and it does not have to be. This is just another mark on NE, win or lose the SB, they just can't stop cheating. I will say though, if luck does not stop looking for the home run on every passing play, espessially in that weather, he won't see a SB. I am of the opinion that this was more than de-inflated balls, in that downpoor for NE to demolish the Colts that way, they knew what the Colts where doing the whole game, another words I am confident good ole cheating BB was listening in. Of course they knew what the Colts were doing the whole game. They knew it yesterday, they knew it the day before, they knew it a month ago. And they exploited the fuck out of it the same way they did the previous three games. Did you think the Colts had some fuckin great surprise? BB out-coached the fuck out of Pagano. I know it pains some of you to admit this, but it actually happened. Before your very eyes. Accept it. How about you accept a foot up your ass. Jets Things! Get the straps.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 13:09:55 GMT -5
Apparently it's shocking to some people that a coach can identify a team's weaknesses and strengths, and then plan to exploit those weaknesses and avoid their strengths.
#thatsnothonorablefootball
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 13:14:54 GMT -5
I do like the fact that my handle, sig, and now avatar pic have been taken over by the Overlords. Nice choice, by the way. I don't control a single aspect of my profile, lol. Price I guess I have to pay to be allowed to post here.
|
|