|
Post by shootmenow on Jan 25, 2015 16:13:39 GMT -5
So here's what the Fagtriot fans are hanging on to... LOL... a supposed conspiracy by ESPN to hide proof the deflation had no effect. Most likely the video was pulled because it was stupid and proved nothing either way. www.massholesports.com/2015/01/espn-removed-sports-science-video-that.html?m=1
Saturday, January 24, 2015 ESPN Removed A Sports Science Video That Scientifically Proved Deflated Balls Didn't Give Tom Brady A Competitive Advantage. What A Bunch Of Crooked Bastids.
We may have a conspiracy on our hands, people.
ESPN Sports Science did an experiment where they deflated a football by 2 pounds and they proved, scientifically, that while such a ball would be easier to grip, the velocity would be reduced and the receiver would lose about an inch when attempting to catch the ball.
So, basically the Patriots did not have a competitive advantage in that Colts game and may have actually been at a disadvantage. And mysteriously, the video has been removed from ESPN.com:
ESPN.com screenshot
Jesus H. Christ, I understand ESPN hates Tom Brady but this is a friggin joke. They're ignoring science so that the mindless haters can just keep on mindlessly hating. What a bunch of bullshit.
I think we finally have our smoking gun that proves all of this Deflate-Gate garbage is nothing more than a media created witch hunt to drive up rating while pandering to the Patriot haters. Why else would ESPN hide the evidence that would end Deflate-Gate once and for all?
The assholes running ESPN ought to be ashamed of themselves. And if they're smart, they'll back the fuck off of Tom Brady before Robert Kraft sues them for slander.
Anyway, thankfully nothing ever really dies on the internet. Someone uploaded the video to youtube (and it's still there as of right now). Here is the video that ESPN is trying to hide from us that would clear Tom Brady's name and shut up all the ignorant douchebags who irrationally hate the Patriots.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 25, 2015 16:24:06 GMT -5
^^^^ personally, I think the deflated ball would be favored in bad weather only. The reason being it is easier to grip and catch, and harder to fumble.
|
|
mykepm
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by mykepm on Jan 25, 2015 16:44:50 GMT -5
So here's what the Fagtriot fans are hanging on to... LOL... a supposed conspiracy by ESPN to hide proof the deflation had no effect. Most likely the video was pulled because it was stupid and proved nothing either way. www.massholesports.com/2015/01/espn-removed-sports-science-video-that.html?m=1
Saturday, January 24, 2015 ESPN Removed A Sports Science Video That Scientifically Proved Deflated Balls Didn't Give Tom SparklePony A Competitive Advantage. What A Bunch Of Crooked Bastids.
We may have a conspiracy on our hands, people.
ESPN Sports Science did an experiment where they deflated a football by 2 pounds and they proved, scientifically, that while such a ball would be easier to grip, the velocity would be reduced and the receiver would lose about an inch when attempting to catch the ball.
So, basically the Deflatriots did not have a competitive advantage in that Colts game and may have actually been at a disadvantage. And mysteriously, the video has been removed from ESPN.com:
ESPN.com screenshot
Jesus H. Christ, I understand ESPN hates Tom SparklePony but this is a friggin joke. They're ignoring science so that the mindless haters can just keep on mindlessly hating. What a bunch of bullshit.
I think we finally have our smoking gun that proves all of this Deflate-Gate garbage is nothing more than a media created witch hunt to drive up rating while pandering to the Deflatriot haters. Why else would ESPN hide the evidence that would end Deflate-Gate once and for all?
The assholes running ESPN ought to be ashamed of themselves. And if they're smart, they'll back the fuck off of Tom SparklePony before Robert Kraft sues them for slander.
Anyway, thankfully nothing ever really dies on the internet. Someone uploaded the video to youtube (and it's still there as of right now). Here is the video that ESPN is trying to hide from us that would clear Tom SparklePony's name and shut up all the ignorant douchebags who irrationally hate the Deflatriots.
Patsies fans don't get it: It doesn't matter whether or not a deflated ball would give them an advantage. There is a rule that dictates what the air pressure should be, and the Patriots broke it. The "it didn't really benefit us" argument didn't work for Spygate either. The "it's a stupid rule" argument also means nothing (besides, Brady is on record as saying he prefers a deflated ball, whether or not it gives him a scientific advantage). Belidick's comments about Spygate yesterday clearly indicate that he thinks NFL rules shouldn't apply to him if he doesn't agree with them. Arrogance.
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Jan 25, 2015 16:45:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Jan 25, 2015 17:43:34 GMT -5
@marcsesslernfl: Sherman: Pats won't be punished as long as Kraft & Goodell 'are taking pictures at each other's homes ... Talk about conflict of interest.
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jan 25, 2015 18:11:19 GMT -5
@marcsesslernfl: Sherman: Flats* won't be punished as long as Kraft & Goodell 'are taking pictures at each other's homes ... Talk about conflict of interest. Glad he's got the guts to call them out. But Marshawn should be penalized for "obscene" gestures!
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jan 25, 2015 18:46:47 GMT -5
@marcsesslernfl: Sherman: Flats* won't be punished as long as Kraft & Goodell 'are taking pictures at each other's homes ... Talk about conflict of interest. Glad he's got the guts to call them out. But Marshawn should be penalized for "obscene" gestures! Guy was just warmin his Skittles.
|
|
|
Post by TheMo on Jan 25, 2015 19:40:19 GMT -5
Glad he's got the guts to call them out. But Marshawn should be penalized for "obscene" gestures! Guy was just warmin his Skittles. Wants to make sure his balls don't get deflated by getting too cold
|
|
|
Post by funaz on Jan 25, 2015 23:57:51 GMT -5
hmm. So do certain words autochange? Belidick, Deflatriots, Tom SparklePony?
LOL hilarious
|
|
|
Post by PK on Jan 26, 2015 0:06:48 GMT -5
hmm. So do certain words autochange? Homeless Hoodie, Deflatriots, Tom SparklePony? LOL hilarious Yes they do. It's part of what puts this site light years ahead of our competition (lol...not Scout). Tell your friends.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Jan 26, 2015 0:07:03 GMT -5
Oh great...now that Funaz is here we have to change "Sanchez" to something else. "Funaz's Daddy" has a nice ring to it. Oh, welcome.
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jan 26, 2015 0:14:13 GMT -5
Oh great...now that Funaz is here we have to change "Sanchez" to something else. "Funaz's Daddy" has a nice ring to it. Oh, welcome.
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jan 26, 2015 0:17:26 GMT -5
Flats*ies fans don't get it: It doesn't matter whether or not a deflated ball would give them an advantage. There is a rule that dictates what the air pressure should be, and the Deflatriots broke it. The "it didn't really benefit us" argument didn't work for Spygate either. The "it's a stupid rule" argument also means nothing (besides, SparklePony is on record as saying he prefers a deflated ball, whether or not it gives him a scientific advantage). Homeless Hoodie's comments about Spygate yesterday clearly indicate that he thinks NFL rules shouldn't apply to him if he doesn't agree with them. Arrogance. This is exactly right. Cheating isn't cheating only if it accomplishes the goal of giving you a competitive advantage. It is cheating at the time the action occurs which intentionally violates the rules. The argument otherwise is like attempting to rob a bank and getting caught before you can leave with the money. The crime occurred when you walked in with the gun and tried to extort money from the bank. The police doesn't let you loose because you didn't get any of the money. That pats fans want to set that standard is telling about their sense of fair play and application of the rules. However, even if you buy that paradigm who says losing an inch of passing distance is not worth the improved grip that avoids fumbles, strip sacks, errant throws, etc. I think most QBs would rather have superior grip at the expense of an inch of distance. Certainly we know Brady prefers a deflated ball for improved grip and he throws a lot of short passes so it's not like he needs every inch on the throw. So to the extent that any competitive advantage could be gained it lines up with Brady's preferences.
|
|
|
Post by funaz on Jan 26, 2015 10:41:46 GMT -5
Oh great...now that Funaz is here we have to change "Sanchez" to something else. "Funaz's Daddy" has a nice ring to it. Oh, welcome. LOL. Even i can appriciate that.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Jan 26, 2015 15:36:49 GMT -5
JayGlazer @jayglazer Breaking news: sources tell @foxsports the NFL has zeroed in on a locker room attendant w Patriots who allegedly took balls from officials locker room to another area on way to field. Sources say they have interviewed him and additionally have video. Still gauging if any wrong doing occurred with him but he is strong person of interest
Uh oh Patriots fans. Here's the smoking gun we've been waiting for.
|
|