|
|
Post by choon328 on Feb 4, 2015 21:45:41 GMT -5
If Mariota is still on the board at 6:
Jets/Eagles Trade
Eagles Receive:
1st Rd #6 overall pick
Jets Receive:
1st Rd #20 overall pick
2nd Rd #52 overall pick
5th Rd #148 overall pick
QB Nick Foles
______________________________
Trade value chart if done with all picks suggests the Jets would receive: 1st and 2nd rd picks this year and an additional 2nd in 2016. Or: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th round picks this year.
I would do it in a heartbeat. If you're not in love with Mariota and can get a young QB in return with an additional 2nd and 5th I think you would have to do it. We all know Foles had a great year in 2013 with the Eagles. But if you take that season away from him he played in 17 additional games with a 60% comp and 19 tds 15 ints. That's still pretty good for a young QB. Last year of his deal so the Eagles may be looking to deal him if they can move up to get Mariota. Not a big financial commitment at all for the Jets and if he starts and plays great he's young enough to lock down for years to come and probably at a decent salary in terms of the QB position. What do you all think?
|
|
|
|
Post by nxyxjets on Feb 4, 2015 21:48:39 GMT -5
no brainer, but I could't see Philly doin that. Chip would be staking his NFL career on a move like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Feb 4, 2015 21:52:45 GMT -5
no brainer, but I could't see Philly doin that. Chip would be staking his NFL career on a move like that. My thing is that Chip fought hard for decision making this off-season. Mariota could be why. If he feels as though getting Mariota would make them at least a perennial playoff team then the risk is worth it for him. |
|
|
|
Post by nxyxjets on Feb 4, 2015 22:07:20 GMT -5
no brainer, but I could't see Philly doin that. Chip would be staking his NFL career on a move like that. My thing is that Chip fought hard for decision making this off-season. Mariota could be why. If he feels as though getting Mariota would make them at least a perennial playoff team then the risk is worth it for him. You know, I forgot about that! It seems possible, and I 'd be okay with it. I know you shouldn't pass on the chance of a franchise QB, but I just don't see that in Mariota. I don't think his style will convert well to the NFL. We definitely need to take a QB in the draft, but I don't know who I like. |
|
|
|
Post by madcroatian on Feb 4, 2015 22:33:45 GMT -5
I would do it for Foles, the 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Feb 4, 2015 22:55:22 GMT -5
Hell no. Foles is very injury prone, and he looked very avg last year. It looks like 2013 was a complete anomaly. Why else would Chip Kelly want to trade him? Now I'm not a fan of Mariota either, but we could get a real game changer at #6 so I'm not trading it unless the offer completely blows me away.
|
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Feb 4, 2015 23:42:23 GMT -5
Nope. Foles is a huge injury risk and overall he was marginally better than Sanchez in a very QB friendly system. If you didn't like Sanchez here then why would you trade into a guy barely better than Sanchez to go into a system less QB friendly? You might as well take the less injury prone of the two.
The real risk with Mariotta is that we draft him and he refuses to play here because he has some under the table agreement with Chip.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20andout on Feb 5, 2015 8:21:21 GMT -5
The real risk with Mariotta is that we draft him and he refuses to play here because he has some under the table agreement with Chip. There is only so much a player can do as far as refusing to play for the team that drafted him. Either Philly still has to pay the Jets a ransom in picks for him, or Marriota will be forced to be out of football until next years draft. He is not the kind of can't miss prospect that could do that. When Eli pulled that BS it wound up as a swap of of the top two picks, involving two prospects both expected to be franchise QBs. |
|
|
|
Post by ftljetfan on Feb 5, 2015 10:18:14 GMT -5
That's actually not that much for Philly to give up a 2nd a 5th and a QB that they aren't that high on to begin with. I would have no problem with it as I like Foles but who would we take at 20?
|
|
|
|
Post by sadface on Feb 5, 2015 10:24:23 GMT -5
i'd want a future 1st in a drop that far. you can throw away the value chart when its a QB up for grabs. two 1's, a 2, foles, and a handful of mid-late rounders
|
|
|
|
Post by DowNY on Feb 5, 2015 14:08:57 GMT -5
Need more value.
|
|
|
|
Post by richcasterfan on Feb 5, 2015 14:33:20 GMT -5
Unless the offensive line is shored up by a lot, we need a quarterback who can take hits. That's not Nick Foles.
|
|
|
|
Post by funaz on Feb 5, 2015 15:18:48 GMT -5
Hell no. Foles is very injury prone, and he looked very avg last year. It looks like 2013 was a complete anomaly. Why else would Chip Kelly want to trade him? Now I'm not a fan of Mariota either, but we could get a real game changer at #6 so I'm not trading it unless the offer completely blows me away. I'd kill for very avg. We haven't have very avg in 12 years! |
|
|
|
Post by madcroatian on Feb 5, 2015 15:24:36 GMT -5
dont tell me Chadwick was a dozen yrs ago? Maybe he was...
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Feb 5, 2015 15:28:47 GMT -5
I'd kill for very avg. We haven't have very avg in 12 years! But that's very avg in Chip Kelly's offense. Even Sanchez looked avg in that offense last year. |
|
