|
Post by choon328 on Feb 18, 2015 7:41:56 GMT -5
Pro Football TalkIt definitely makes sense to get it done now prior to free agency so you know exactly how much cap room you will have. Plus he deserves it.
|
|
|
Post by Aussie Jet on Feb 18, 2015 21:53:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Feb 19, 2015 3:50:56 GMT -5
Would like to keep Harris. He's been dependable even if he can't cover WRs...
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on Feb 19, 2015 6:55:33 GMT -5
harris is not worth another 9 million contract. the jets should offer a reasonable price and then be happy to use a draft pick if he walks. as for wilk, the jet dline has been much ballyhooed for the past few seasons but they still don't put a ton of pressure on qb's. granted the secondary has been going downhill but something has to be done to get the pressure. right now the best dline guy is richardson.
|
|
|
Post by greenwave on Feb 19, 2015 11:11:41 GMT -5
harris is not worth another 9 million contract. the jets should offer a reasonable price and then be happy to use a draft pick if he walks. as for wilk, the jet dline has been much ballyhooed for the past few seasons but they still don't put a ton of pressure on qb's. granted the secondary has been going downhill but something has to be done to get the pressure. right now the best dline guy is richardson. There is absolutely no way Harris gets another 9 mil. Question is, can the Jets keep him 3 yr / 12M-14M? I think it's possible, but Harris may want to test the waters. If he wants more than that, he may have to.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Feb 19, 2015 12:20:01 GMT -5
Harris is a solid football player, I just think his best days have past. He is a very good run stopper but is terrible in drop back coverage. I think if the Jets upgrade their secondary and pass rush, I think Harris can be effective as an in the box run stuffer kind of like Karlos Dansby when he was with Boles in Arizona.
3 year and 5 mil a year at most.
|
|
|
Post by madcroatian on Feb 19, 2015 12:32:34 GMT -5
I know Mo has been a great Jet but he is not JJ Watt, and I really hope we don't overpay like we did with D'Brick. Big Mo peaked in 2012 oddly enough. His past two years just weren't as good.
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Feb 20, 2015 13:25:22 GMT -5
Pro Football TalkIt definitely makes sense to get it done now prior to free agency so you know exactly how much cap room you will have. Plus he deserves it. Or if it even makes sense. I know this is heresy but we have a ton of talent on the DL, wonder if his asking price could get too high to a team that has the luxury of being deep at the position
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Feb 20, 2015 13:54:46 GMT -5
Pro Football TalkIt definitely makes sense to get it done now prior to free agency so you know exactly how much cap room you will have. Plus he deserves it. Or if it even makes sense. I know this is heresy but we have a ton of talent on the DL, wonder if his asking price could get too high to a team that has the luxury of being deep at the position Where's the depth behind him and Richardson? I don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Feb 20, 2015 13:56:44 GMT -5
Would like to keep Harris. He's been dependable even if he can't cover WRs... He can't cover his grandmother - younger and faster should be the motto here
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Feb 20, 2015 15:42:44 GMT -5
Or if it even makes sense. I know this is heresy but we have a ton of talent on the DL, wonder if his asking price could get too high to a team that has the luxury of being deep at the position Where's the depth behind him and Richardson? I don't see it. There's depth. They could sign someone down the road and trade Mo for a boatload of picks if they wanted to.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Feb 20, 2015 19:34:07 GMT -5
Where's the depth behind him and Richardson? I don't see it. There's depth. They could sign someone down the road and trade Mo for a boatload of picks if they wanted to. What depth? Name some names. I'll wait...
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Feb 20, 2015 19:42:39 GMT -5
There's depth. They could sign someone down the road and trade Mo for a boatload of picks if they wanted to. What depth? Name some names. I'll wait... So to follow you, we have two DLmen, no more. If Mo was gone we would play a two man line. You're telling me I'm wrong, the DL isn't a position of strength. We're fucked if we don't play these three. You need fucking help remembering the names of the other defensive lineman? Especially if we bring back Doz or sign another player as I originally posted. Go go argue somewhere else with this shit.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Feb 21, 2015 3:03:35 GMT -5
What depth? Name some names. I'll wait... So to follow you, we have two DLmen, no more. If Mo was gone we would play a two man line. You're telling me I'm wrong, the DL isn't a position of strength. We're fucked if we don't play these three. You need fucking help remembering the names of the other defensive lineman? Especially if we bring back Doz or sign another player as I originally posted. Go go argue somewhere else with this shit. I'm not arguing at all. You originally posted the Jets have the "luxury of being deep at the position". You were talking about what's on the roster right now. I'll even give you Douzable even though he's an UFA at this point. I disagreed and asked you to tell me where all that depth is. You still haven't mentioned one name that is signed and on the roster. The defensive line is only a strength if Mo is on it. We only have 2 players on defense that are considered 2 of the better players in the league and yet we should get rid of one b/c of money when we have $50 million to spend? Who are you going to bring in? Some tool making $5 million/year who is half the player Mo is? The only strength on this roster is the defensive line and that's only b/c of Mo, Sheldon and Snacks, not b/c of the depth, and yet you want to break that up. Makes no sense at all. Why be cheap with that much money available? You made a comment, I responded. That's how message boards work. Just b/c you were obviously wrong doesn't mean you have to get cranky. I guess you could always prove me wrong by naming all of that depth the Jets have on the roster but we both know that's not happening. Get the stick out of your ass.
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Feb 21, 2015 9:24:40 GMT -5
So to follow you, we have two DLmen, no more. If Mo was gone we would play a two man line. You're telling me I'm wrong, the DL isn't a position of strength. We're fucked if we don't play these three. You need fucking help remembering the names of the other defensive lineman? Especially if we bring back Doz or sign another player as I originally posted. Go go argue somewhere else with this shit. I'm not arguing at all. You originally posted the Jets have the "luxury of being deep at the position". You were talking about what's on the roster right now. I'll even give you Douzable even though he's an UFA at this point. I disagreed and asked you to tell me where all that depth is. You still haven't mentioned one name that is signed and on the roster. The defensive line is only a strength if Mo is on it. We only have 2 players on defense that are considered 2 of the better players in the league and yet we should get rid of one b/c of money when we have $50 million to spend? Who are you going to bring in? Some tool making $5 million/year who is half the player Mo is? The only strength on this roster is the defensive line and that's only b/c of Mo, Sheldon and Snacks, not b/c of the depth, and yet you want to break that up. Makes no sense at all. Why be cheap with that much money available? You made a comment, I responded. That's how message boards work. Just b/c you were obviously wrong doesn't mean you have to get cranky. I guess you could always prove me wrong by naming all of that depth the Jets have on the roster but we both know that's not happening. Get the stick out of your ass. You're right, I stand corrected, the jets DON'T have depth at DL. That is if you think Snacks, Richardson, Douz, Mo, Ellis, Barnes with Coples able to slide back onto the line doesn't represent good depth for a 3-4 defense, so be it. Repeating the same the same thing over and over again, isn't what message boards should be about.
|
|