Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 16:41:40 GMT -5
I have a feeling that the Bradford Foles swap is meant for us. We wil also get the higher 1st round pick that the Rams traded away for foles. Bradford and the 10th pick for for the 6th pick? If the Jets evaluators think Mariota has the potential to be a franchise QB, they would not do it. Where are you getting that the trade would be the Rams #1 & Bradford for Foles? One - I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Two - that would be an enormously bad trade for the Rams. I think the deal is Bradford for Foles straight up. Per ESPN
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Mar 10, 2015 16:42:25 GMT -5
Yes. Something is wrong with mine. Looks like it's in some weird beta version of this site. Everything is all over the place. just hit home Just hit home it will refresh forums.net is having issues with the servers. The home site is down for accounts Didn't work. Just refreshed to the same format. Still messed up.
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Mar 10, 2015 16:42:55 GMT -5
I'd still be okay with Fitzpatrick in all honesty...unless we get someone from the draft. Bradford and Foles are both coming off of injuries kind of glad we're not taking too big of a chance right now
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Mar 10, 2015 16:43:55 GMT -5
just hit home Just hit home it will refresh forums.net is having issues with the servers. The home site is down for accounts Didn't work. Just refreshed to the same format. Still messed up. Hit back until you get there it will work
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Mar 10, 2015 16:45:07 GMT -5
Bradford and the 10th pick for for the 6th pick? If the Jets evaluators think Mariota has the potential to be a franchise QB, they would not do it. Where are you getting that the trade would be the Rams #1 & Bradford for Foles? One - I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Two - that would be an enormously bad trade for the Rams. I think the deal is Bradford for Foles straight up. Per ESPNA Rams beat writer reported that the deal included a swap of 1s -- he later backtracked and said he could not confirm that any exchange of picks was involved.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Mar 10, 2015 16:47:16 GMT -5
Fuck off Rex.
|
|
|
Post by rangerous on Mar 10, 2015 16:54:02 GMT -5
Forget Revis. Does anyone have any news on where Kyle Burnt Toast Wilson plans to go. ? i didn't know Kyle Burnt Toast Wilson was a pakis.
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Mar 10, 2015 16:57:05 GMT -5
Where are you getting that the trade would be the Rams #1 & Bradford for Foles? One - I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Two - that would be an enormously bad trade for the Rams. I think the deal is Bradford for Foles straight up. Per ESPNA Rams beat writer reported that the deal included a swap of 1s -- he later backtracked and said he could not confirm that any exchange of picks was involved. Yeah my bad on that.
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Mar 10, 2015 17:01:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Mar 10, 2015 17:02:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Mar 10, 2015 17:02:18 GMT -5
Toucher and Rich ā@toucherandrich If true, that's inexcusable. RT @benvolin: Iām told Revis wants $40 mil guaranteed over 3 yrs and the #Patriots balked at the full guarantee
|
|
|
Post by jetfuel on Mar 10, 2015 17:03:17 GMT -5
Jason La Canfora ā@jasonlacanfora Revis's reps have told teams they have $48M for 3yrs on the table now, with $40M guaranteed. My sense if that is from the Jets...
|
|
|
Post by choon328 on Mar 10, 2015 17:06:29 GMT -5
I think the Jets will wind up guaranteeing the entire contract if the Patriots up their offer.
|
|
|
Post by morite on Mar 10, 2015 17:09:59 GMT -5
Things are getting interesting, boys and girls.
That's a lot of money Revis, but...I'm all in at this point.
Any word on Cro?
|
|
|
Post by Brady's a catcher on Mar 10, 2015 17:09:59 GMT -5
I think the Jets will wind up guaranteeing the entire contract if the Patriots up their offer. I fuckin hope so, what's the difference at that point?
|
|