cmart
Full Member
Posts: 146
|
Post by cmart on Apr 2, 2016 19:12:05 GMT -5
Ha. Sounds like Gabriel & Leming have a history. Gabriel was scout & dir of college scouting for Bears.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Apr 2, 2016 19:21:35 GMT -5
Ha. Sounds like Gabriel & Leming have a history. Gabriel was scout & dir of college scouting for Bears. I hope Gabriel is right, but I tend to agree with Laming. Given the $$ someone would have to pay for Mo, we might not get more than a 2, or we woudl look at a package including a swap of 1s.. Depth of DL in the draft doesn't help our leverage any either. Will be fascinating to see how this and the Fitz thing play out over the next few weeks. |
|
cmart
Full Member
Posts: 146
|
Post by cmart on Apr 2, 2016 19:34:52 GMT -5
Ha. Sounds like Gabriel & Leming have a history. Gabriel was scout & dir of college scouting for Bears. I hope Gabriel is right, but I tend to agree with Laming. Given the $$ someone would have to pay for Mo, we might not get more than a 2, or we woudl look at a package including a swap of 1s.. Depth of DL in the draft doesn't help our leverage any either. Will be fascinating to see how this and the Fitz thing play out over the next few weeks. It will. Can't see anything happening until draft week. But it's pretty clear Mo will be dealt. The positive for Jets, Mo is proven unlike those being drafted. |
|
|
|
Post by HawkeyeJet on Apr 2, 2016 19:47:06 GMT -5
From Aaron Leming -- covers the Bears for Bleacher Report: That last one is damn interesting and so something I hadn't thought of. Packaging Mo plus 20 to move up near top 10 plus another pick or 2 would be intriguing. |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Apr 2, 2016 19:58:18 GMT -5
That last one is damn interesting and so something I hadn't thought of. Packaging Mo plus 20 to move up near top 10 plus another pick or 2 would be intriguing. That's been part of my dream scenario. Ship Mo, 20, and like a 4th for 11 and Jeffery. The Jeffery part won't happen, but the Bears make the most sense as a trade partner. Hopefully, Jack or one of the QBs will be available at 11. |
|
cmart
Full Member
Posts: 146
|
Post by cmart on Apr 2, 2016 20:11:06 GMT -5
Oakland also makes a lot of sense. From their standpoint they have the cap room, the QB and building a damn good team.
|
|
|
|
Post by eboozer32 on Apr 2, 2016 20:26:45 GMT -5
Oakland also makes a lot of sense. From their standpoint they have the cap room, the QB and building a damn good team. Forget it. Raiderholic just said Raiders have no interest. Since he and Markie Davis are Butt Buddies...you have to take him at his word.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Apr 2, 2016 20:58:47 GMT -5
That last one is damn interesting and so something I hadn't thought of. Packaging Mo plus 20 to move up near top 10 plus another pick or 2 would be intriguing. That's been part of my dream scenario. Ship Mo, 20, and like a 4th for 11 and Jeffery. The Jeffery part won't happen, but the Bears make the most sense as a trade partner. Hopefully, Jack or one of the QBs will be available at 11. I don't think there is any way that Jack is there at 11. Pretty sure we would be in position to grab Lynch if we got to 11 -- but to get Wentz or Goff, we would probably have to jump SF to get into top 6. If we got the Bears 11, we would probably have to package it with a 2 to get to 5 or 6 and have a shot at Goff/Wentz or Jack. |
|
|
|
Post by ruby2 on Apr 2, 2016 21:08:23 GMT -5
Nothing happens and he plays out this year and we will be right back where we started this time next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on Apr 2, 2016 22:10:43 GMT -5
Nice to see you here cmart.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Nosebleed on Apr 2, 2016 22:13:49 GMT -5
That's been part of my dream scenario. Ship Mo, 20, and like a 4th for 11 and Jeffery. The Jeffery part won't happen, but the Bears make the most sense as a trade partner. Hopefully, Jack or one of the QBs will be available at 11. I don't think there is any way that Jack is there at 11. Pretty sure we would be in position to grab Lynch if we got to 11 -- but to get Wentz or Goff, we would probably have to jump SF to get into top 6. If we got the Bears 11, we would probably have to package it with a 2 to get to 5 or 6 and have a shot at Goff/Wentz or Jack. I also doubt that any of them will be there, but Jack was injured all year so you never know. Also hopefully Wentz or Goff suffer from a Aaron Rodgers type drop. I wouldn't make the trade with the Bears until I knew who was available at #11 or if they wanted to give up #11 straight up for Wilk. |
|
