Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 15:22:01 GMT -5
It’s another article complaining about a past President hoping we don’t care about the blatant lies Trump states ona daily basis. Wrong, it's an article showing the hypocrisy of fake news. It really has nothing to do with Obama. It has to do with the reporting on what he said vs what Republicans said about the same incident. It’s desperate
|
|
|
Fake News
Dec 6, 2018 15:29:55 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Trades on Dec 6, 2018 15:29:55 GMT -5
Wrong, it's an article showing the hypocrisy of fake news. It really has nothing to do with Obama. It has to do with the reporting on what he said vs what Republicans said about the same incident. It’s desperate Only if you don't know how to read.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 15:33:57 GMT -5
Only if you don't know how to read. Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Dec 6, 2018 15:39:37 GMT -5
Only if you don't know how to read. Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets. you'll be able to keep your own doctor...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 15:40:29 GMT -5
Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets. you'll be able to keep your own doctor... I did
|
|
|
Fake News
Dec 6, 2018 21:15:19 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Trades on Dec 6, 2018 21:15:19 GMT -5
Only if you don't know how to read. Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets. Again it isn't about Trump at all. It is about how the news handled the same story from 2 perspectives one Dem and one gop. When they discussed the Dem side they said it was completely true, yet the top side that claimed exactly what they said was true when defending the Dems was ruled false when stated by the gop. You are very aptly named.
|
|
|
Fake News
Dec 6, 2018 21:19:32 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Jets Things on Dec 6, 2018 21:19:32 GMT -5
Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets. Again it isn't about Trump at all. It is about how the news handled the same story from 2 perspectives one Dem and one gop. When they discussed the Dem side they said it was completely true, yet the top side that claimed exactly what they said was true when defending the Dems was ruled false when stated by the gop. You are very aptly named. Especially the Moron part.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 7, 2018 10:12:44 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 12:19:03 GMT -5
Haha if someone that is desperate enough to draw the comparison between Trump and Obama and needs to scourge through a speech about light bulbs isn’t desperate then what would you call it. Obama wasn’t a great President, yet the Trumpers need to constantly bring him up in an attempt to justify the constant bs tweets. Again it isn't about Trump at all. It is about how the news handled the same story from 2 perspectives one Dem and one gop. When they discussed the Dem side they said it was completely true, yet the top side that claimed exactly what they said was true when defending the Dems was ruled false when stated by the gop. You are very aptly named. It isn’t about Trump? Why is Trump mentioned in your cited article?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 12:29:28 GMT -5
Again it isn't about Trump at all. It is about how the news handled the same story from 2 perspectives one Dem and one gop. When they discussed the Dem side they said it was completely true, yet the top side that claimed exactly what they said was true when defending the Dems was ruled false when stated by the gop. You are very aptly named. Especially the Moron part. Very hurtful
|
|
|
Fake News
Dec 7, 2018 12:30:21 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Jets Things on Dec 7, 2018 12:30:21 GMT -5
Especially the Moron part. Very hurtful Sorry. I'll get you a trophy.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 7, 2018 12:38:26 GMT -5
Again it isn't about Trump at all. It is about how the news handled the same story from 2 perspectives one Dem and one gop. When they discussed the Dem side they said it was completely true, yet the top side that claimed exactly what they said was true when defending the Dems was ruled false when stated by the gop. You are very aptly named. It isn’t about Trump? Why is Trump mentioned in your cited article? It is about the biased news. They say it is good that the news is investigating Trump bit that they were biased for Obama and then go on to give examples. They are saying there should be an even hand in presenting the news.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 12:43:46 GMT -5
Sorry. I'll get you a trophy. Just knowing you follow me on here is reward enough. Stalker
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 12:44:56 GMT -5
It isn’t about Trump? Why is Trump mentioned in your cited article? It is about the biased news. They say it is good that the news is investigating Trump bit that they were biased for Obama and then go on to give examples. They are saying there should be an even hand in presenting the news. The Washington Examiner bitching about other news outlets being slanted is funny all by itself.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 7, 2018 12:50:03 GMT -5
It is about the biased news. They say it is good that the news is investigating Trump bit that they were biased for Obama and then go on to give examples. They are saying there should be an even hand in presenting the news. The Washington Examiner bitching about other news outlets being slanted is funny all by itself. scifanatic-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/facepalm-head.jpg
|
|