|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 22, 2019 14:51:08 GMT -5
Meaning, the Dims were for a Burisma investigation before they were against it - and a number of countries have taken action against Burisma (or their personnel) in the past and/or are contemplating doing so presently (including Ukraine). My point being - Burisma was not some unfairly-targeted mom-and-pop entity and was not targeted BECAUSE of the Biden connection. Burisma is, by any account, a dirty, fraudulent business and was since it's get-go as (what looks like) the money-laundering vehicle for the Ukraine oligarch who served as their Interior Minister or whatnot. It's the Bidens own problems that they got mixed up in this - not that the US would want the company investigated. When were they ever for it? If anything we had no position/didn't give a shit until Burisma started pumping cash into Hunter Biden and everyone else. Here's an interesting read by John Solomon. johnsolomonreports.com/the-ukraine-scandal-timeline-democrats-and-their-media-allies-dont-want-america-to-see/They have really been going after John Solomon in these hearings. You know that means his sauces are terrific and it drives them nuts. Not being able to control the narrative. I give them credit for calling these conspiracy theories with a straight face after peddling Trump/Russia for 3 years. Solomon has best track-record on the Trump investigations the past 3 years and its not even close. Other networks were firing and reassigning people bc of their colossal fuck-ups.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 22, 2019 14:58:07 GMT -5
They have really been going after John Solomon in these hearings. You know that means his sauces are terrific and it drives them nuts. Not being able to control the narrative. I give them credit for calling these conspiracy theories with a straight face after peddling Trump/Russia for 3 years. Solomon has best track-record on the Trump investigations the past 3 years and its not even close. Other networks were firing and reassigning people bc of their colossal fuck-ups. Solomon is fucking killing it. The MSM is now calling him a conspiracy peddler and The Hill, where he used to write, announced they are reviewing all his articles. Solomon's response was basically "Bring it on".
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 22, 2019 14:59:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by adpz on Nov 22, 2019 15:40:45 GMT -5
When were they ever for it? If anything we had no position/didn't give a shit until Burisma started pumping cash into Hunter Biden and everyone else. Here's an interesting read by John Solomon. I don't mean to say that Dims were for investigating Burisma. My point is that nobody would have been against a Burisma investigation - until Hunter was hired, and espy until Trump was for it. The Yanukovitch regime was epically corrupt - recall the personal zoo, gold-plated fencing - and Burisma was part-and-parcel of that. Burisma was never defensible - only ignorable (aided by the Bidens).
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 22, 2019 18:41:12 GMT -5
Guy raises some interesting questions.
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Nov 22, 2019 21:03:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Nov 22, 2019 22:21:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Nov 23, 2019 8:42:34 GMT -5
Y'all know who George Webb is? He has a YouTube channel and he's been reporting on all these Ukraine things I think. I couldn't understand or follow what he was saying in his videos whenever I seen them but damn near every one of the names in this thing, I've heard them coming from him first... Going WAY back.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Nov 24, 2019 17:07:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2019 11:35:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Dec 4, 2019 12:01:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Dec 5, 2019 13:07:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Dec 6, 2019 14:09:09 GMT -5
Er, anyone see Nunes on Fox this week tap-dancing around whether he ever spoke to Parnas on the phone? Not saying there was anything wrong with the calls, if they happened, but the way Nunes handled the questions was not with confidence to say the least. Kinda struck me odd.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Dec 6, 2019 14:21:48 GMT -5
Er, anyone see Nunes on Fox this week tap-dancing around whether he ever spoke to Parnas on the phone? Not saying there was anything wrong with the calls, if they happened, but the way Nunes handled the questions was not with confidence to say the least. Kinda struck me odd. Was half watching him on one of the news shows. He definitely looked a little uncomfortable but I didn't give enough of a shit to rewind and find out why.
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Dec 6, 2019 15:33:32 GMT -5
Fiona Hill testified yesterday that she initially opposed giving the Ukraine military aid because she didn't think they had the ability to use the sophisticated weaponry. Here's the Javelin anti tank weapon in action. It's basically point and shoot. Lying cunt. was i the only one thinking that the missile, once it cleared the launcher, was going to point down, do a wiley coyote thing and explode right in front of them?
|
|