|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on May 5, 2021 8:54:33 GMT -5
First draft pick in the league this year to sign. Is this still the Jets?  |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on May 5, 2021 9:12:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on May 5, 2021 11:34:06 GMT -5
Pete Prisco say the Jets gave up too much for the 14th pick?...
|
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on May 5, 2021 12:40:07 GMT -5
Pete Prisco say the Jets gave up too much for the 14th pick?... I think its a little early to say they gave up too much. By the draft trade value chart, he's right, they gave up 46 points more than they got back. To be totally fair, they should have gotten another 4th rounder back. But to get a guy they had reportedly ranked in the top 10 on their board, doesn't seem like too much of an overpayment. Rumor has it after Wilson and Lawrence, they had Pitts at 3 and Slater, AVT, and Sewell, in that order, all in the top 10. So AVT was somewhere between 5-10 for them. If they're right, and he is a top 10 guy, then in theory they may have gained a couple hundred points trading up to 14 for a guy in the top 10. |
|
|
|
Post by crossfire on May 5, 2021 13:12:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on May 5, 2021 13:13:07 GMT -5
Pete Prisco say the Jets gave up too much for the 14th pick?... I think its a little early to say they gave up too much. By the draft trade value chart, he's right, they gave up 46 points more than they got back. To be totally fair, they should have gotten another 4th rounder back. But to get a guy they had reportedly ranked in the top 10 on their board, doesn't seem like too much of an overpayment. Rumor has it after Wilson and Lawrence, they had Pitts at 3 and Slater, AVT, and Sewell, in that order, all in the top 10. So AVT was somewhere between 5-10 for them. If they're right, and he is a top 10 guy, then in theory they may have gained a couple hundred points trading up to 14 for a guy in the top 10. they signed 12 free agents...7 on the defensive side...and then drafted another 6 more...they got 2 #1's and 2's next year...and some of these guys won't make team...an all-pro OL(yr 3) is worth a lot more than 46 pts..... |
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on May 6, 2021 1:14:12 GMT -5
Got the Shrek look down. Teh hampre be leaking into pop culture |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on May 6, 2021 15:05:47 GMT -5
I think its a little early to say they gave up too much. By the draft trade value chart, he's right, they gave up 46 points more than they got back. To be totally fair, they should have gotten another 4th rounder back. But to get a guy they had reportedly ranked in the top 10 on their board, doesn't seem like too much of an overpayment. Rumor has it after Wilson and Lawrence, they had Pitts at 3 and Slater, AVT, and Sewell, in that order, all in the top 10. So AVT was somewhere between 5-10 for them. If they're right, and he is a top 10 guy, then in theory they may have gained a couple hundred points trading up to 14 for a guy in the top 10. they signed 12 free agents...7 on the defensive side...and then drafted another 6 more...they got 2 #1's and 2's next year...and some of these guys won't make team...an all-pro OL(yr 3) is worth a lot more than 46 pts..... Agreed. And the other point the "experts" are ignoring is that they argue we could have had 2 more guys in the 3rd... but JD said if he had a 3rd, he'd have taken Michael Carter anyway... so we still got the guy we would have taken higher. |
|
