|
Post by thebigragu on Sept 18, 2015 11:09:23 GMT -5
So this has nothing to do with my opinions of Geno(which I'm sure people will think I'm defending him, which I'm not) or my feelings on using the term gay in that manner(which I don't care). That said, wasn't there a recent discussion on how to legitimize this place a little more not that long ago? If that is still a goal( and again, I don't care if it is or not, and I'm not upset or offended that this thread title was changed), stuff like this is the exact opposite of that. Lots of people hate Geno. That's perfectly fine. He's not been a good QB here and has made some bonehead decisions. That shouldn't prevent people from having an opinion that he's not the worst QB in the history of the NFL, and have all threads regarding him in any fashion turn into a complete mockery. You're absolutely right. I didn't see it changed until just now. Usually that's reserved for the hampur. And ghey is the appropriate term.
|
|
|
Post by thebigragu on Sept 18, 2015 11:10:44 GMT -5
Anyone remember the original thread title?
|
|
|
Post by HawkeyeJet on Sept 18, 2015 11:12:25 GMT -5
Change gay to angry and it's back.
|
|
|
Post by 2foolish on Sept 18, 2015 11:23:13 GMT -5
I want Fitz to go 4-0 so Geno can whine some more while us Jets fans drink his tears. Though I still think the hate for Smith is at times unfair, if Fitz goes 4-0 you can pass me a nice tall glass of Geno Tears. i don't have any hate for him... just don't think he's the answer here...seen enough of him...
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Sept 18, 2015 11:56:44 GMT -5
What's this thread about?
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Sept 18, 2015 11:58:03 GMT -5
Fuck Geno. How many years you want to give him? If he was any good at all, he would have elevated the scrub receiving corps in to something salvageable. He didn't, not even close. Put Kerley on the pats, and he's in the Probowl. So fuck you all and you're lets coddle Geno another fucking year bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Sept 18, 2015 12:17:21 GMT -5
Fuck Geno. How many years you want to give him? If he was any good at all, he would have elevated the scrub receiving corps in to something salvageable. He didn't, not even close. Put Kerley on the pats, and he's in the Probowl. So fuck you all and you're lets coddle Geno another fucking year bullshit. Hey Capital L - you need a hug?
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Sept 18, 2015 13:25:24 GMT -5
Fuck Geno. How many years you want to give him? If he was any good at all, he would have elevated the scrub receiving corps in to something salvageable. He didn't, not even close. Put Kerley on the pats, and he's in the Probowl. So fuck you all and you're lets coddle Geno another fucking year bullshit. Hey Capital L - you need a hug? No, I need a beer and a BJ.
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Sept 19, 2015 12:14:15 GMT -5
What part of this is troublesome? Am I missing something?The rest of the article? The guy still takes no responsibility for the situation he was/is in. That is not leadership. Fighting with a teammate over $600 when you are worth millions is not leadership. Throwing 5 picks in a game and being generally shity is not leadership. He is one of the worst QBs in the league and exhibited some horrible decision making on and off the field. Why wouldn't the team stick with Fitz? It was Geno's issues that made it so easy for the staff to say "it is Fitz' job to lose" but sure if you cherry pick one sentence from a rant and take it out of context of the situation then it isn't that bad. Sounds to me the rest of the article is meaningless, youre talking about your interpretation of what happened and have your mind made up. None of which has anything to do with him being pissed that someone assaulted him and youre going to blame Geno for getting assaulted. The team shouldnt stick with a QB they think isnt as good as one on the bench due to an assault. Plain and simple, if they feel this way Geno will be the QB and all the whining about off field shit isnt going to change things. For every reach to prove he has no leadership there are just as many to prove otherwise. If you hate Geno you see it your way, lets face it.
|
|
|
Post by shootmenow on Sept 19, 2015 12:29:31 GMT -5
Stiff a tough guy for $600 = Broken jaw. And let's not forget he was stealing from children. That $600 spent for nothing was $600 less that went to the charity. I understand he had a death in the family or something. But be a man and double the $600 instead of standing on an excuse. He's an immature imbecile. I'm an optimistic guy and did have hopes he would turn around this year. This whole situation just adds to the list of things against that happening.
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Sept 19, 2015 12:39:22 GMT -5
Stiff a tough guy for $600 = Broken jaw. And let's not forget he was stealing from children. That $600 spent for nothing was $600 less that went to the charity. I understand he had a death in the family or something. But be a man and double the $600 instead of standing on an excuse. He's an immature imbecile. I'm an optimistic guy and did have hopes he would turn around this year. This whole situation just adds to the list of things against that happening. The $600 was for a plane ticket, get your head out your ass.
|
|
|
Post by shootmenow on Sept 19, 2015 12:50:40 GMT -5
And let's not forget he was stealing from children. That $600 spent for nothing was $600 less that went to the charity. I understand he had a death in the family or something. But be a man and double the $600 instead of standing on an excuse. He's an immature imbecile. I'm an optimistic guy and did have hopes he would turn around this year. This whole situation just adds to the list of things against that happening. The $600 was for a plane ticket, get your head out your ass. And after I just said nice things about you in the Bowles thread. The plane ticket was purchased for him to appear at the charity, hopefully increasing donations. Therefore the charity had $600 less for the kids. How is that having my head where you want to put your tongue?
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Sept 19, 2015 13:00:09 GMT -5
The $600 was for a plane ticket, get your head out your ass. And after I just said nice things about you in the Bowles thread. The plane ticket was purchased for him to appear at the charity, hopefully increasing donations. Therefore the charity had $600 less for the kids. How is that having my head where you want to put your tongue? That's a fallacy though. Yes, donations would have likely increased if Geno was there but the $600 was for a plane ticket, the charity and the kids would have seen $0 of that money. Plenty of other things to fault Geno for, he should've even donated his own money to the charity when he couldn't make it to the event, but this is just bias looking for more shit to pile on top of him.
|
|
|
Post by vin on Sept 19, 2015 19:09:30 GMT -5
The $600 was for a plane ticket, get your head out your ass. And after I just said nice things about you in the Bowles thread. The plane ticket was purchased for him to appear at the charity, hopefully increasing donations. Therefore the charity had $600 less for the kids. How is that having my head where you want to put your tongue? Why do you think it's $600 less when that is actually the price of the plane ticket? No one knows how much money was donated to that charity. All you're doing is making assumptions. And anyway, who gives a shit about Geno now?
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Sept 20, 2015 8:31:12 GMT -5
The rest of the article? The guy still takes no responsibility for the situation he was/is in. That is not leadership. Fighting with a teammate over $600 when you are worth millions is not leadership. Throwing 5 picks in a game and being generally shity is not leadership. He is one of the worst QBs in the league and exhibited some horrible decision making on and off the field. Why wouldn't the team stick with Fitz? It was Geno's issues that made it so easy for the staff to say "it is Fitz' job to lose" but sure if you cherry pick one sentence from a rant and take it out of context of the situation then it isn't that bad. Sounds to me the rest of the article is meaningless, youre talking about your interpretation of what happened and have your mind made up. None of which has anything to do with him being pissed that someone assaulted him and youre going to blame Geno for getting assaulted. The team shouldnt stick with a QB they think isnt as good as one on the bench due to an assault. Plain and simple, if they feel this way Geno will be the QB and all the whining about off field shit isnt going to change things. For every reach to prove he has no leadership there are just as many to prove otherwise. If you hate Geno you see it your way, lets face it. Actually I was pulling for Geno this year and he let me down yet again. And what you are describing above is called an OPINION which is what this board is about. Geno may have the leadership to be presidential material (who doesn't these days?) I just don't see if based on his public persona. Refute my opinion rather than the fact that it is an opinion because honestly none of us have a clue what is really going on inside the organization or in Geno's empty head.
|
|