|
Post by iamthewalrus on Jan 27, 2016 8:15:23 GMT -5
Would you rather have a chick with a great ass and no tits or a chick with great tits and no ass? Im all about the ass myself I'll take the chick with no tits and a no ass and no gag reflex. That's the problem with the Jets. Very touchy gag reflex.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 27, 2016 10:10:52 GMT -5
Would you rather have a chick with a great ass and no tits or a chick with great tits and no ass? Im all about the ass myself I'll take the chick with no tits and a no ass and no gag reflex. That's the problem with the Jets. Very touchy gag reflex. So you want a gay dude then. lul
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 27, 2016 10:11:27 GMT -5
Would you rather have a chick with a great ass and no tits or a chick with great tits and no ass? Im all about the ass myself That bass no treble?
|
|
|
Post by iamthewalrus on Jan 27, 2016 11:28:41 GMT -5
I'll take the chick with no tits and a no ass and no gag reflex. That's the problem with the Jets. Very touchy gag reflex. So you want a gay dude then. lul Why? You available?
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 27, 2016 11:47:38 GMT -5
So you want a gay dude then. lul Why? You available? I am neither gay nor available, but keep looking, don't give up. Your bronie is out there somewhere...
|
|
|
Post by iamthewalrus on Jan 27, 2016 15:25:48 GMT -5
I am neither gay nor available, but keep looking, don't give up. Your bronie is out there somewhere... ...so you claim. It's the one's who try too hard that are usually in the closet. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I won't hold it against you.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 28, 2016 9:08:29 GMT -5
I'd trade three years of playoff runs for the first pick in the draft when a QB the caliber of Manning or Luck is the clear #1 pick.
|
|
|
Post by jett on Jan 28, 2016 10:44:43 GMT -5
I'd trade three years of playoff runs for the first pick in the draft when a QB the caliber of Manning or Luck is the clear #1 pick. 100 percent agree
|
|
|
Post by greenwave on Jan 28, 2016 13:32:05 GMT -5
I'd trade three years of playoff runs for the first pick in the draft when a QB the caliber of Manning or Luck is the clear #1 pick. The Indianapolis Colts will experience about 30 YEARS of competitive play (give or take, barring injury) due to exactly this. I'd probably give up more than three years of playoff runs, since getting one of those guys virtually guarantees at least three. You can win a Super Bowl without a franchise QB, but you can't have sustained success without one. As Jets fans, I'm sure we'd take the success the Pats have had over the past 15 years even if it only meant 1 or 2 total SBs. We are fans of a franchise that has never in its existence posted winning records for four straight seasons. I know the players would care, but I wouldn't care if the Jets sacrificed an entire season if it meant getting the next Sure Thing, which of course only comes around once a decade (if that).
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 28, 2016 14:03:01 GMT -5
I'd trade three years of playoff runs for the first pick in the draft when a QB the caliber of Manning or Luck is the clear #1 pick. The Indianapolis Colts will experience about 30 YEARS of competitive play (give or take, barring injury) due to exactly this. I'd probably give up more than three years of playoff runs, since getting one of those guys virtually guarantees at least three. You can win a Super Bowl without a franchise QB, but you can't have sustained success without one. As Jets fans, I'm sure we'd take the success the Pats have had over the past 15 years even if it only meant 1 or 2 total SBs. We are fans of a franchise that has never in its existence posted winning records for four straight seasons. I know the players would care, but I wouldn't care if the Jets sacrificed an entire season if it meant getting the next Sure Thing, which of course only comes around once a decade (if that). Funny you should mention the Colts. In the last 60 years, they've had a franchise QB for 45 of them, and they are just getting started with Luck. The only dry spell being 15 years between Bert Jones and Peyton Manning. 1956-1972 Johnny Unitas (3 MVP's --- and in 1968 with Unitas injured his back-up Earl Morral won the MVP); 1973-1981 Bert Jones (1 MVP); 1982-1997 Mike Pagel/Jack Trudeau/Jeff George/Jim Harbaugh; 1998-2011 Peyton Manning; (4 MVP's) 2012- ? Andrew Luck
|
|
|
Post by Peebag on Jan 28, 2016 15:12:30 GMT -5
playoff run. the draft is so iffy that a high pick doesn't guarantee teams anything. teams like green bay have maybe a handful of free agent type players. most of the players come through the draft or undrafted free agents. and green bay has been pretty good for a very long time and haven't had the luxury of really high draft picks. and then look at teams like detroit or even cleveland that have been bad for a really long time. detroit has a ton of high draft picks and they still stink. they even have a really good qb and stink. cleveland? no one knows what's going on there. imo the ideal situation is to use your players and parlay them into high draft picks by trading them much like the patsies did with bledsoe or seymour. if the nfl made trades easier then there would be more action. the bottom line is you need success to increase the value of your plaers and to get that success you may need to get some high draft picks or make trades or get free agents. Green Bay has had a HOF type qb in place since 1992. To be successful long term - you need a good qb.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 28, 2016 15:29:26 GMT -5
playoff run. the draft is so iffy that a high pick doesn't guarantee teams anything. teams like green bay have maybe a handful of free agent type players. most of the players come through the draft or undrafted free agents. and green bay has been pretty good for a very long time and haven't had the luxury of really high draft picks. and then look at teams like detroit or even cleveland that have been bad for a really long time. detroit has a ton of high draft picks and they still stink. they even have a really good qb and stink. cleveland? no one knows what's going on there. imo the ideal situation is to use your players and parlay them into high draft picks by trading them much like the patsies did with bledsoe or seymour. if the nfl made trades easier then there would be more action. the bottom line is you need success to increase the value of your plaers and to get that success you may need to get some high draft picks or make trades or get free agents. Green Bay has had a HOF type qb in place since 1992. To be successful long term - you need a good qb. Hell, they've had 3 since 1957. That means that in 67% of their seasons since 1957, they've had a HOF qb (we all know Rodgers will be there too). People forget how great Bart Starr was. The guy was competing over 60% of his passes in an age when that was unheard of. In 1966 he completed 66% of his passes!!!
|
|
|
Post by fullblast on Jan 28, 2016 18:10:09 GMT -5
Playoff run, you can find good players anywhere. Even a run that ends short of a championship leaves you with fond memories. That's why we watch.
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Jan 28, 2016 21:39:12 GMT -5
Playoff run, you can find good players anywhere. Even a run that ends short of a championship leaves you with fond memories. That's why we watch. Exactly. Playoffs, no question. Year after year after year.
|
|
|
Post by Hotman on Jan 29, 2016 22:57:58 GMT -5
I am neither gay nor available, but keep looking, don't give up. Your bronie is out there somewhere... ...so you claim. It's the one's who try too hard that are usually in the closet. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I won't hold it against you.
|
|