|
Post by Chesapeakejet on Apr 21, 2016 12:24:31 GMT -5
Is Kelly Ripa taking his spot? Isn't she too young for you? She's a skank. A skinny one at that.
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Apr 21, 2016 12:38:01 GMT -5
FF2, you have daughters. How do you feel about that bill? Would you have wanted your daughters to share a bathroom in school with someone that was born with a penis. I mean, you know how those teenage boys are. Now if a molester wants to dress up as a woman to get access to little girls then yeah thats a problem. But cant they do that now anyway? (If we take away the panties...only the criminal will have panties!) Also...my kids never went in to a public bathroom alone. T All that matters in the scheme of things is that this law is ripe for exploitation by pervs. (not throwing Transgenders in with them). It is happening already. Whether people want to admit it or not, the world is full of twisted, sick people to whom bathrooms are alluring in a sexual way...to deny it is naive. Ask any Special Victims Detective how they feel about this. Are you telling us you went into ladies public bathrooms with your daughter? I have a 10 year old, should I have to drag her into a mens room with me, or do I linger outside the ladies room hoping there are no predators inside? Heretofore, someone who looked like a man entering a ladies room would raise flags; Now, we to turn a blind eye, for fear of hurting the feelings of a transgender..and because it is legalized? When did their "feelings" trump our right to feel secure in our bathroom experiences? In this case, Schilling was dumb because of his own history...but what he posted was not a knock on transgenders, but more a commentary on the intolerance and demagoguery practiced by those who seek to impose their ethics and values on others.
|
|
|
Post by Chesapeakejet on Apr 21, 2016 12:42:25 GMT -5
Now if a molester wants to dress up as a woman to get access to little girls then yeah thats a problem. But cant they do that now anyway? (If we take away the panties...only the criminal will have panties!) Also...my kids never went in to a public bathroom alone. T All that matters in the scheme of things is that this law is ripe for exploitation by pervs. (not throwing Transgenders in with them). It is happening already. Whether people want to admit it or not, the world is full of twisted, sick people to whom bathrooms are alluring in a sexual way...to deny it is naive. Ask any Special Victims Detective how they feel about this. Are you telling us you went into ladies public bathrooms with your daughter? I have a 10 year old, should I have to drag her into a mens room with me, or do I linger outside the ladies room hoping there are no predators inside? Heretofore, someone who looked like a man entering a ladies room would raise flags; Now, we to turn a blind eye, for fear of hurting the feelings of a transgender..and because it is legalized? When did their "feelings" trump our right to feel secure in our bathroom experiences? In this case, Schilling was dumb because of his own history...but what he posted was not a knock on transgenders, but more a commentary on the intolerance and demagoguery practiced by those who seek to impose their ethics and values on others. And ESPN just proved his point.
|
|
|
Post by 32Green on Apr 21, 2016 12:55:34 GMT -5
All that matters in the scheme of things is that this law is ripe for exploitation by pervs. (not throwing Transgenders in with them). It is happening already. Whether people want to admit it or not, the world is full of twisted, sick people to whom bathrooms are alluring in a sexual way...to deny it is naive. Ask any Special Victims Detective how they feel about this. Are you telling us you went into ladies public bathrooms with your daughter? I have a 10 year old, should I have to drag her into a mens room with me, or do I linger outside the ladies room hoping there are no predators inside? Heretofore, someone who looked like a man entering a ladies room would raise flags; Now, we to turn a blind eye, for fear of hurting the feelings of a transgender..and because it is legalized? When did their "feelings" trump our right to feel secure in our bathroom experiences? In this case, Schilling was dumb because of his own history...but what he posted was not a knock on transgenders, but more a commentary on the intolerance and demagoguery practiced by those who seek to impose their ethics and values on others. And ESPN just proved his point. Yup. The media drives this crap. Here in NYC, we have a white dude...who identifies as black...writing columns for the daily news wherein he bashes white people and cawps and basically stirs the racial flames of conflict. He gets caught plagiarizing his columns...and the Daily News fires his editor, who the News maintains should have known the work was plagiarized ...while the columnist keeps his job..because the News is afraid to fire a black guy who is a white guy who feels black. It truly is an insidious disease.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Apr 21, 2016 13:55:08 GMT -5
Now if a molester wants to dress up as a woman to get access to little girls then yeah thats a problem. But cant they do that now anyway? (If we take away the panties...only the criminal will have panties!) Also...my kids never went in to a public bathroom alone. T All that matters in the scheme of things is that this law is ripe for exploitation by pervs. (not throwing Transgenders in with them). It is happening already. Whether people want to admit it or not, the world is full of twisted, sick people to whom bathrooms are alluring in a sexual way...to deny it is naive. Ask any Special Victims Detective how they feel about this. Are you telling us you went into ladies public bathrooms with your daughter? I have a 10 year old, should I have to drag her into a mens room with me, or do I linger outside the ladies room hoping there are no predators inside? Heretofore, someone who looked like a man entering a ladies room would raise flags; Now, we to turn a blind eye, for fear of hurting the feelings of a transgender..and because it is legalized? When did their "feelings" trump our right to feel secure in our bathroom experiences? In this case, Schilling was dumb because of his own history...but what he posted was not a knock on transgenders, but more a commentary on the intolerance and demagoguery practiced by those who seek to impose their ethics and values on others. Ill take your word for it about bathrooms. (But isn't anyone worried about men diddling boys in the mens room?) The sad part to me is that this bathroom thing is being used to define what the NC laws are all about and its nothing of the sort. Its a smokescreen to deny transgenders and homosexuals their rights. Whats weird is currently I don't think there are any actual laws on the books now about who can use what bathroom (correct me if Im wrong). If so I've seen it broken at concerts and sporting events ALOT. Now imagine this scenario.....woman to man transgender...now has to use the girls room. Is this what we want? The whole thing is a kerfuffle.
|
|
|
Post by Fishooked on Apr 21, 2016 14:12:51 GMT -5
Employers are always scouring your social media for this kind of stuff, even for low-rung schlubs like myself, so I always stay away from any of that nonsense on Facebook.
If you're a public figure and you're doing it (repeatedly), then you're a moron - regardless of the topic at hand.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Apr 21, 2016 14:44:20 GMT -5
Employers are always scouring your social media for this kind of stuff, even for low-rung schlubs like myself, so I always stay away from any of that nonsense on Facebook. If you're a public figure and you're doing it (repeatedly), then you're a moron - regardless of the topic at hand. So you have to be in favor of gay marriage and trans-genders and, if you aren't and have a different more traditional view (which until about 5 minutes ago was the normal view and which is still the view of at least 50% of this country), then you can be fired? Somehow that doesn't really seem American to me at all. Remember the "outrage" when some people and athletes expressed disgust at seeing Michael Sam kiss his little boy toy during the draft? I have to like that? I can't think it was gross? I have to think it's awesome and wonderful and beautiful? And if I don't and express what 90% of men just naturually thought (which is that it was kinda gross) then the media and social justice brigade has the right to say "how dare you feel that way!" It's a fuckin' joke dude. It's a tool that the left uses to intimidate and try to control how we think - as I said I am not going to adhere and FUCK THE THOUGHT POLICE!
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Apr 21, 2016 14:58:30 GMT -5
I agree with him Let those twisted fucks piss outside in the bushes. Some of this shit is ridiculous. Like how tranny's are trying to get into women's MMA. Are you kidding me? I don't give a shit if you "feel like a woman". You're still a dickless dude beating the shit out of chicks. Untouchabel for President!
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Apr 21, 2016 15:01:41 GMT -5
Employers are always scouring your social media for this kind of stuff, even for low-rung schlubs like myself, so I always stay away from any of that nonsense on Facebook. If you're a public figure and you're doing it (repeatedly), then you're a moron - regardless of the topic at hand. So you have to be in favor of gay marriage and trans-genders and, if you aren't and have a different more traditional view (which until about 5 minutes ago was the normal view and which is still the view of at least 50% of this country), then you can be fired? Somehow that doesn't really seem American to me at all. Remember the "outrage" when some people and athletes expressed disgust at seeing Michael Sam kiss his little boy toy during the draft? I have to like that? I can't think it was gross? I have to think it's awesome and wonderful and beautiful? And if I don't and express what 90% of men just naturually thought (which is that it was kinda gross) then the media and social justice brigade has the right to say "how dare you feel that way!" It's a fuckin' joke dude. It's a tool that the left uses to intimidate and try to control how we think - as I said I am not going to adhere and FUCK THE THOUGHT POLICE! I don't think you need to be in favor of anything. I think employers just don't want to risk having an employee who may act hostile to a gay or transgendered fellow employee. For instance if a guy posts: "Im sick and tired of these gays shoving their way of life down my throat" they may think you would not be able to work along side them effectively. And with the younger generation being much more accepting...studies put it about 70% pro gay marriage...someone may have a hard time with them. Also...a note on statistics...if 50% of the people approve of something...hard to call either side "normal." Unless you want to get all biblical.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Apr 21, 2016 15:34:07 GMT -5
So you have to be in favor of gay marriage and trans-genders and, if you aren't and have a different more traditional view (which until about 5 minutes ago was the normal view and which is still the view of at least 50% of this country), then you can be fired? Somehow that doesn't really seem American to me at all. Remember the "outrage" when some people and athletes expressed disgust at seeing Michael Sam kiss his little boy toy during the draft? I have to like that? I can't think it was gross? I have to think it's awesome and wonderful and beautiful? And if I don't and express what 90% of men just naturually thought (which is that it was kinda gross) then the media and social justice brigade has the right to say "how dare you feel that way!" It's a fuckin' joke dude. It's a tool that the left uses to intimidate and try to control how we think - as I said I am not going to adhere and FUCK THE THOUGHT POLICE! I don't think you need to be in favor of anything. I think employers just don't want to risk having an employee who may act hostile to a gay or transgendered fellow employee. For instance if a guy posts: "Im sick and tired of these gays shoving their way of life down my throat" they may think you would not be able to work along side them effectively. And with the younger generation being much more accepting...studies put it about 70% pro gay marriage...someone may have a hard time with them. Also...a note on statistics...if 50% of the people approve of something...hard to call either side "normal." Unless you want to get all biblical. So the media has the right to demand and demean people for expressing their disgust with the way they naturally feel when seeing 2 men kiss? The players that tweeted how they felt didn't work for ESPN. As for "normal" - I said it was considered normal 5 minutes ago, meaning that about 5 years ago something like 70% of the population was against gay marriage. Now it's 50%. Oh, and Fuck Millenials. They are the most anti-free speech generation in the history of America.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Apr 21, 2016 16:56:52 GMT -5
I don't think you need to be in favor of anything. I think employers just don't want to risk having an employee who may act hostile to a gay or transgendered fellow employee. For instance if a guy posts: "Im sick and tired of these gays shoving their way of life down my throat" they may think you would not be able to work along side them effectively. And with the younger generation being much more accepting...studies put it about 70% pro gay marriage...someone may have a hard time with them. Also...a note on statistics...if 50% of the people approve of something...hard to call either side "normal." Unless you want to get all biblical. So the media has the right to demand and demean people for expressing their disgust with the way they naturally feel when seeing 2 men kiss? The players that tweeted how they felt didn't work for ESPN. The media has the right to say whatever they want as much as you have the right to say what you want. If you are going to express opinions you need to be ready for people to disagree with you. Doesn't mean either of you is right or wrong. These are opinions.
|
|
|
Post by frostlich on Apr 21, 2016 21:18:24 GMT -5
My guess is curt gives 2 rats fucks about getting fired from his "job."
Didn't even look at the meme. More power to him. Fuck espn.
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Apr 22, 2016 8:25:16 GMT -5
My guess is curt gives 2 rats fucks about getting fired from his "job." Didn't even look at the meme. More power to him. Fuck espn. IM not sure about that, he went broke recently and was very sick. And still has kids college age. He blew through $50,000,000 on his video game company. Guys gonna need a paycheck somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Apr 22, 2016 8:37:58 GMT -5
So the media has the right to demand and demean people for expressing their disgust with the way they naturally feel when seeing 2 men kiss? The players that tweeted how they felt didn't work for ESPN. The media has the right to say whatever they want as much as you have the right to say what you want. If you are going to express opinions you need to be ready for people to disagree with you. Doesn't mean either of you is right or wrong. These are opinions. As I said before dude, "Fuck the thought police." I will think and say whatever I want as its my right as an American. I will never ever give up the fight against politically correct fucking BS. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Gunnails on Apr 22, 2016 9:02:09 GMT -5
There is nothing in the constitution about any right to feel secure in our bathroom experiences.
|
|