|
|
Post by RobR on Dec 30, 2014 19:51:11 GMT -5
I'm surprised someone has not done this sooner, but here it is. Lots of top prospects playing in these games starting with Georgia and Louisville tonight. Parker got robbed of a TD and Georgia has the best damn set of true freshman RB's in all of college football. Sony Michel is going to be a stud in a few years and Chubb looks like an up and coming bruiser. reminds me a bit of Laveon Bell.
Anyone see how Stanley played for ND earlier?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 30, 2014 19:59:44 GMT -5
Holliman not helping himself in this game. Burnt on a long TD pass and injures his shoulder while tackling Chubb.
|
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Dec 30, 2014 20:06:11 GMT -5
I love Parker, he's a natural at the position.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 30, 2014 20:15:07 GMT -5
I'm surprised someone has not done this sooner, but here it is. Lots of top prospects playing in these games starting with Georgia and Louisville tonight. Parker got robbed of a TD and Georgia has the best damn set of true freshman RB's in all of college football. Sony Michel is going to be a stud in a few years and Chubb looks like an up and coming bruiser. reminds me a bit of Laveon Bell. Anyone see how Stanley played for ND earlier? Didn't see the ND game, but it sounds like Ronnie Stanley had a big game. Seems like the ND O Line dominated LSU, and Brian Kelly singled out Stanley's performance in his post game comments. Has Stanley declared for the draft -- had not heard that he had made any decision yet? |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Dec 30, 2014 20:24:00 GMT -5
I'm surprised someone has not done this sooner, but here it is. Lots of top prospects playing in these games starting with Georgia and Louisville tonight. Parker got robbed of a TD and Georgia has the best damn set of true freshman RB's in all of college football. Sony Michel is going to be a stud in a few years and Chubb looks like an up and coming bruiser. reminds me a bit of Laveon Bell. Anyone see how Stanley played for ND earlier? Didn't see the ND game, but it sounds like Ronnie Stanley had a big game. Seems like the ND O Line dominated LSU, and Brian Kelly singled out Stanley's performance in his post game comments. Has Stanley declared for the draft -- had not heard that he had made any decision yet? If he declares he's going high, real high....I still have not heard any word about him declaring but I haven't been digging too deep at this stage. |
|
|
|
Post by RobR on Dec 30, 2014 21:14:27 GMT -5
I'll take Parker at six overall and never look back. Parker>Cooper
|
|
|
|
Post by CTJetsFanII on Dec 30, 2014 21:17:30 GMT -5
I'll take Parker at six overall and never look back. Parker>Cooper +1. Was just coming here to post the same thing |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 30, 2014 21:19:53 GMT -5
Been waiting for Parker to show up tonight -- he was huge on that last drive. I definitely do not want Holliman -- he needs another year in school.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryu79 on Dec 30, 2014 21:51:32 GMT -5
I'll take Parker at six overall and never look back. Parker>Cooper +1. Was just coming here to post the same thing Samesies. Or atleast if Cooper is gone, Parker is worth the pick, amazing hands. |
|
|
|
Post by sec.101row23 on Dec 31, 2014 8:49:58 GMT -5
Been waiting for Parker to show up tonight -- he was huge on that last drive. I definitely do not want Holliman -- he needs another year in school. Parker did what he could last night, the QB situation was pretty bad this year for Louisville. Parker is a beast though, I wouldn't hesitate at all taking him at 6. As far as Holliman goes, he gets hype for his impressive INT total, but is pretty poor all around. I see him being projected by many in the second round and that's just crazy. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 31, 2014 10:02:49 GMT -5
Been waiting for Parker to show up tonight -- he was huge on that last drive. I definitely do not want Holliman -- he needs another year in school. Parker did what he could last night, the QB situation was pretty bad this year for Louisville. Parker is a beast though, I wouldn't hesitate at all taking him at 6. As far as Holliman goes, he gets hype for his impressive INT total, but is pretty poor all around. I see him being projected by many in the second round and that's just crazy. Agree on both points. I would happily "settle" for Parker at 6. And as for Holliman, I don't like to overreact to one game, but it looked to me like he was responsible for two of the Dawgs biggest plays yesterday. He was out of position after overreacting to pre-snap motion on Chubb's 82 yard run and could not recover and fill the hole on time and he broke the wrong way on our first TD pass -- not sure if Mason looked him off or if he just misread the play and broke the wrong way. Not an impressive outing for the kid, he reminded me a bit of another Louisville safety. No way do I touch him anywhere near the 2nd round. I am not sure Holliman was even the best free safety in yesterday's game. I thought Dominick Sanders -- freshman FS for Georgia -- looked better than Holliman. The kid was all over the field making plays and has just kept getting better all season. |
|
|
|
Post by sec.101row23 on Dec 31, 2014 10:15:51 GMT -5
Parker did what he could last night, the QB situation was pretty bad this year for Louisville. Parker is a beast though, I wouldn't hesitate at all taking him at 6. As far as Holliman goes, he gets hype for his impressive INT total, but is pretty poor all around. I see him being projected by many in the second round and that's just crazy. Agree on both points. I would happily "settle" for Parker at 6. And as for Holliman, I don't like to overreact to one game, but it looked to me like he was responsible for two of the Dawgs biggest plays yesterday. He was out of position after overreacting to pre-snap motion on Chubb's 82 yard run and could not recover and fill the hole on time and he broke the wrong way on our first TD pass -- not sure if Mason looked him off or if he just misread the play and broke the wrong way. Not an impressive outing for the kid, he reminded me a bit of another Louisville safety. No way do I touch him anywhere near the 2nd round. I am not sure Holliman was even the best free safety in yesterday's game. I thought Dominick Sanders -- freshman FS for Georgia -- looked better than Holliman. The kid was all over the field making plays and has just kept getting better all season. It's not really a one game overreaction to Holliman, last night you saw what he is. The people hyping him probably have only watched his INT highlight video and haven't seen just how bad the rest of his game is. For me, Cody Prewitt is 100x the prospect that Holliman is. Chubb was a monster yet again last night, if you can get a QB next year you could have a nice season. I think most of your O line is back if I'm not mistaken. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 31, 2014 10:29:01 GMT -5
Agree on both points. I would happily "settle" for Parker at 6. And as for Holliman, I don't like to overreact to one game, but it looked to me like he was responsible for two of the Dawgs biggest plays yesterday. He was out of position after overreacting to pre-snap motion on Chubb's 82 yard run and could not recover and fill the hole on time and he broke the wrong way on our first TD pass -- not sure if Mason looked him off or if he just misread the play and broke the wrong way. Not an impressive outing for the kid, he reminded me a bit of another Louisville safety. No way do I touch him anywhere near the 2nd round. I am not sure Holliman was even the best free safety in yesterday's game. I thought Dominick Sanders -- freshman FS for Georgia -- looked better than Holliman. The kid was all over the field making plays and has just kept getting better all season. It's not really a one game overreaction to Holliman, last night you saw what he is. The people hyping him probably have only watched his INT highlight video and haven't seen just how bad the rest of his game is. For me, Cody Prewitt is 100x the prospect that Holliman is. Chubb was a monster yet again last night, if you can get a QB next year you could have a nice season. I think most of your O line is back if I'm not mistaken. We lose two guys off the OL -- C David Andrews & RT Kolton Houston. Not sure at this stage what kind of depth we have behind them. Next season will come down to Brice Ramsey or Jacob Park who redshirted this season at QB, but with our running game, it should help the transition for a freshman/soph QB. |
|
|
|
Post by sec.101row23 on Dec 31, 2014 10:35:51 GMT -5
It's not really a one game overreaction to Holliman, last night you saw what he is. The people hyping him probably have only watched his INT highlight video and haven't seen just how bad the rest of his game is. For me, Cody Prewitt is 100x the prospect that Holliman is. Chubb was a monster yet again last night, if you can get a QB next year you could have a nice season. I think most of your O line is back if I'm not mistaken. We lose two guys off the OL -- C David Andrews & RT Kolton Houston. Not sure at this stage what kind of depth we have behind them. Next season will come down to Brice Ramsey or Jacob Park who redshirted this season at QB, but with our running game, it should help the transition for a freshman/soph QB. That freshman TE Blazevich looks nice too. I think Park wins that QB job, he is legit, nice size and a really good arm. |
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Dec 31, 2014 10:45:21 GMT -5
We lose two guys off the OL -- C David Andrews & RT Kolton Houston. Not sure at this stage what kind of depth we have behind them. Next season will come down to Brice Ramsey or Jacob Park who redshirted this season at QB, but with our running game, it should help the transition for a freshman/soph QB. That freshman TE Blazevich looks nice too. I think Park wins that QB job, he is legit, nice size and a really good arm. You looking forward to bigger and better things out of your Tigers next season -- especially if Watson comes back healthy. You guys seem to have a lot of young talent (Gallman, Scott, Williams) on the offensive side of the ball. Was really surprised by the beatdown you put on OU the other day. |
|
