|
|
Post by Big L on Mar 4, 2017 19:04:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Mar 4, 2017 21:30:24 GMT -5
When they say, "funds that combat terrorism" they mean us giving money to countries that hate us in hopes that they dont hate us. And when they say "create opportunities for American workers" they mean defense contractors making money on war.
|
|
|
|
Post by JetRepulsion1 on Mar 5, 2017 8:26:41 GMT -5
When they say, "funds that combat terrorism" they mean us giving money to countries that hate us in hopes that they dont hate us. And when they say "create opportunities for American workers" they mean defense contractors making money on war. Fuck foreign aid. I say we give them dick. Let them take care of themselves. I hate that my taxes go towards paying any foreign country (or illegal alien) one fucking cent. Ugly dems always trying to make other countries like us by paying billions. Just like ugly fucks like ff2 and Elliot spitzer paying hookers to bang them cause know regular girl would touch them because they are hideously ugly. I'm telling you it all comes down to them being so grotesquely ugly. We beautiful people don't understand because we can get laid in the real world without payment, but ff2 and the dems are so ugly that they have to pay. Liberals are the party of ugly brainwashed fucks. The more ugly, the bigger democrat. Yuck. |
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Mar 5, 2017 10:41:04 GMT -5
I despise giving money to the likes of Pakistan, who was harboring bin laden for a decade.
|
|
|
|
Post by vin on Mar 5, 2017 16:15:21 GMT -5
^ Pakistan deserves to get wiped off the face of the earth just for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 6, 2017 16:21:52 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. |
|
|
|
Post by Big L on Mar 6, 2017 18:48:52 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. 1% of a $100 budget, OK. I don't give a fuck about a dollar. But 1% of this countries budget is a shit ton of money. Money that absolutely should be spent more wisely, if not spent at all. What if we put that 1% towards paying off our unsustainable debt? That might be a good idea. |
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Mar 6, 2017 19:07:12 GMT -5
We ought to have a lottery with all needy countries, pick one, and fix their issues. Then move on to the next. Sending starving countries flour doesn't do anything long term. There is too much corruption with foreign aid right now. Build a desalinization plant give them pipe and seed and do it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Mar 10, 2017 6:43:36 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. The failure to acknowledge even 1℅ is important when considering needed cuts in spending. That's how you create a budget. When your proposed budget has more expenses than income, you look where to cut. And you cut every "penny" you can. Show me a business that considers 1℅ of its budget insignificant, and I'll show you a poorly run business. While I believe every penny counts, the federal budget will never be balanced until someone has the courage to reform the dollars that go to entitlements. |
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Mar 10, 2017 8:15:37 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. The failure to acknowledge even 1℅ is important when considering needed cuts in spending. That's how you create a budget. When your proposed budget has more expenses than income, you look where to cut. And you cut every "penny" you can. Show me a business that considers 1℅ of its budget insignificant, and I'll show you a poorly run business. While I believe every penny counts, the federal budget will never be balanced until someone has the courage to reform the dollars that go to entitlements. and that has to be all entitlements, personal, corporate and foreign. |
|
|
|
Post by Ff2 on Mar 10, 2017 9:56:49 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. The failure to acknowledge even 1℅ is important when considering needed cuts in spending. That's how you create a budget. When your proposed budget has more expenses than income, you look where to cut. And you cut every "penny" you can. Show me a business that considers 1℅ of its budget insignificant, and I'll show you a poorly run business. While I believe every penny counts, the federal budget will never be balanced until someone has the courage to reform the dollars that go to entitlements. I meant to convey that I think 1% is appropriate. And yes of course we know any budget considerations that are NOT SS, Medicare/Medicaid or Defense are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Which is why I laugh when conservative go after PBS first. As if thats some kind of accomplishment. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Mar 10, 2017 11:27:06 GMT -5
It's a big 1% of budget. It's money well spent. If you add up all the 1%s of the budget that we could cut, it would be a decent chunk of change. One of the reasons this country wastes so much money is because people think "oh its just 1% here, 1% there" |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Mar 10, 2017 11:29:44 GMT -5
The failure to acknowledge even 1℅ is important when considering needed cuts in spending. That's how you create a budget. When your proposed budget has more expenses than income, you look where to cut. And you cut every "penny" you can. Show me a business that considers 1℅ of its budget insignificant, and I'll show you a poorly run business. While I believe every penny counts, the federal budget will never be balanced until someone has the courage to reform the dollars that go to entitlements. I meant to convey that I think 1% is appropriate. And yes of course we know any budget considerations that are NOT SS, Medicare/Medicaid or Defense are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Which is why I laugh when conservative go after PBS first. As if thats some kind of accomplishment.The government should not be funding the arts or things like PBS. You want to support them, donate your own money. But federal funding of those things means the gov't starts to decide what is art, who gets grants, etc. and you know who benefits? Folks who are already "in" or rich, or fill out grant forms well. John Stossel had a good piece on this recently. |
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Mar 10, 2017 11:47:11 GMT -5
Not to hijack, but the PBS reference got me looking for John Stossels opinion piece
|
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Mar 10, 2017 11:56:47 GMT -5
The failure to acknowledge even 1℅ is important when considering needed cuts in spending. That's how you create a budget. When your proposed budget has more expenses than income, you look where to cut. And you cut every "penny" you can. Show me a business that considers 1℅ of its budget insignificant, and I'll show you a poorly run business. While I believe every penny counts, the federal budget will never be balanced until someone has the courage to reform the dollars that go to entitlements. I meant to convey that I think 1% is appropriate. And yes of course we know any budget considerations that are NOT SS, Medicare/Medicaid or Defense are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Which is why I laugh when conservative go after PBS first. As if thats some kind of accomplishment. Keep your hands off my NPR. Click and Clack got me through years of tax season Saturdays. |
|
