Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2018 10:29:39 GMT -5
I’m willing to bet some of the information utilized was in cooperation with other nations intel communities. If Carter Page travels throughout the world while meeting with foreigners, yes. Still waiting on the quote. If we ask our allies for something like that, there's is a formal request, or a paper trail. Nothing like that exists here. Is it possible that the Obama admin back channeled our allies to illegally spy on an American, and the UK and Australia don't want to be embarrassed publicly for having interfered in our election? It seems like it's all falling apart if you ask me. Google Anything is possible, especially when people get caught up in conspiracy theories.
|
|
|
Post by Trades on Sept 24, 2018 10:30:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 10:32:48 GMT -5
Still waiting on the quote. If we ask our allies for something like that, there's is a formal request, or a paper trail. Nothing like that exists here. Is it possible that the Obama admin back channeled our allies to illegally spy on an American, and the UK and Australia don't want to be embarrassed publicly for having interfered in our election? It seems like it's all falling apart if you ask me. Google Anything is possible, especially when people get caught up in conspiracy theories. LOL, just admit you made shit up. Also admit Obama spied on Trumps campaign after weaponizing our intelligence agencies. Get ahead of the curve for once.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 10:51:13 GMT -5
Jerry Nadler (D) is on CNN looking like someone shot his dog. Trying to spin a resignation is the same as being fired.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 24, 2018 10:53:16 GMT -5
Artie Lange... the voice of reason.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 24, 2018 10:56:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 10:57:22 GMT -5
Bwahahahahaha, , msnbc just said that Rosenstein is not resigning but he won't leave the White House unless they fire him.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 24, 2018 10:58:14 GMT -5
Bwahahahahaha, , msnbc just said that Rosenstein is not resigning but he won't leave the White House unless they fire him. Probably just wants to collect unemployment
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 11:01:58 GMT -5
Bwahahahahaha, , msnbc just said that Rosenstein is not resigning but he won't leave the White House unless they fire him. Probably just wants to collect unemployment Nah, the WH has good food. He just wants to be like Tom Hanks character when he's stuck at the airport.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 11:04:40 GMT -5
Huh? You don't think that if your home has smart appliances and the gov has a surveillance order on you they wouldn't use them to listen in on you? I like the pic though, it doesn't help your cause.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Reynolds on Sept 24, 2018 11:07:29 GMT -5
Huh? You don't think that if your home has smart appliances and the gov has a surveillance order on you they wouldn't use them to listen in on you? I like the pic though, it doesn't help your cause. Apple doesn't even open up locked phones in school shooting investigations, but they're going to let obama spy on trump? Come on. Now the microwave... that's a different story. I don't like the way that thing looks at me. Never trusted it.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 11:08:02 GMT -5
Lol now Adam Schiff is saying Rosenstein should demand to be fired.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2018 11:08:36 GMT -5
Google Anything is possible, especially when people get caught up in conspiracy theories. LOL, just admit you made shit up. Also admit Obama spied on Trumps campaign after weaponizing our intelligence agencies. Get ahead of the curve for once. Does the government monitor US citizens under Section 702? Yes. Although the government cannot designate “United States persons” as the “targets” of its warrantless Section 702 monitoring, it can still capture or scan their internet or telephone conversations as part of this surveillance. “US person” is a legal term that includes US citizens and green-card holders as well as some corporations and associations. By law, the government must adopt “targeting procedures” that are “reasonably designed” to prevent it from gathering communications that are solely between people the intelligence agencies know to be in the United States – or US persons abroad. However, this restriction leaves plenty of legal room for the government to sweep up potentially huge numbers of communications to or from Americans.
|
|
|
Post by tkasper01 on Sept 24, 2018 11:11:37 GMT -5
Huh? You don't think that if your home has smart appliances and the gov has a surveillance order on you they wouldn't use them to listen in on you? I like the pic though, it doesn't help your cause. They really cannot listen but glean info from the device in use. Now Google with this Alexa shit. That is a whole nother level of domestic, corporate spying.
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Sept 24, 2018 11:13:54 GMT -5
LOL, just admit you made shit up. Also admit Obama spied on Trumps campaign after weaponizing our intelligence agencies. Get ahead of the curve for once. Does the government monitor US citizens under Section 702? Yes. Although the government cannot designate “United States persons” as the “targets” of its warrantless Section 702 monitoring, it can still capture or scan their internet or telephone conversations as part of this surveillance. “US person” is a legal term that includes US citizens and green-card holders as well as some corporations and associations. By law, the government must adopt “targeting procedures” that are “reasonably designed” to prevent it from gathering communications that are solely between people the intelligence agencies know to be in the United States – or US persons abroad. However, this restriction leaves plenty of legal room for the government to sweep up potentially huge numbers of communications to or from Americans. What is this bullshit? They had a FISA warrant on Page, you said the two hop rule doesn't apply. Show me where that is stated.
|
|