|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 25, 2015 21:14:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Lithfan on Jan 25, 2015 21:19:15 GMT -5
Jason Babin and Dawan Landry are both above average players? Same category as Mo? |
|
|
|
Post by themagicrat on Jan 25, 2015 21:24:02 GMT -5
If this list is accurate, it really demonstrates the importance of the QB.
The Colts and Cardinals were one more player away from the Super Bowl than the Jets, but they were in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Jan 25, 2015 21:48:18 GMT -5
jags ... 30th place. With all those high draft picks. That's like a Royal Flush of failure.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Jan 25, 2015 21:53:54 GMT -5
That doesn't seem very close. In 14th place, and if you look at it this way, 4 players on defense and and 4 on offense, 4/11 or 36% of the team?
|
|
|
|
Post by bxjetfan on Jan 25, 2015 22:06:11 GMT -5
What, like no white players could have helped? First the Oscars and now this. |
|
|
|
Post by HawkeyeJet on Jan 25, 2015 22:10:39 GMT -5
Landry and Babin ahead of Decker? Please.
Lots of other issues with that list, but Deckers production with a little missed time and our QB situation was nothing short of impressive.
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 25, 2015 22:11:52 GMT -5
That doesn't seem very close. In 14th place, and if you look at it this way, 4 players on defense and and 4 on offense, 4/11 or 36% of the team? 14th place is higher than I thought they would have us. Maybe we looked worse than we really are b.c we were awful at two very visible positions, QB and CB. |
|
|
|
Post by vin on Jan 25, 2015 22:19:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by DDNYjets on Jan 25, 2015 22:25:11 GMT -5
Jason Babin and Dawan Landry are both above average players? Same category as Mo?  Don't shoot the messenger. |
|
|
|
Post by madcroatian on Jan 25, 2015 22:30:17 GMT -5
Man... look at the Colts. Fatcessa would love to see that figure.
|
|
|
|
Post by vicmill on Jan 25, 2015 23:56:18 GMT -5
That doesn't seem very close. In 14th place, and if you look at it this way, 4 players on defense and and 4 on offense, 4/11 or 36% of the team? 14th place is higher than I thought they would have us. Maybe we looked worse than we really are b.c we were awful at two very visible positions, QB and CB. Or maybe we have decent players and we were just awful at the coaching position. |
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Jan 26, 2015 0:21:05 GMT -5
What that really amounts to is that we were short eight starters or other players who saw meaningful playtime. Having eight better players on the bottom of the roster would have little to no impact on the season. I'm not sure 36% would be accurate because the team rotates players through the game in several positions but even if the right number was 20% that is still a stupidly large share of roster spots where we failed to field quality players.
|
|
kuntysoze
Full Member
Lexington Steele fucked my ass
69%
The mods can't see me
Posts: 407
|
Post by kuntysoze on Jan 26, 2015 9:12:52 GMT -5
What that really amounts to is that we were short eight starters or other players who saw meaningful playtime. Having eight better players on the bottom of the roster would have little to no impact on the season. I'm not sure 36% would be accurate because the team rotates players through the game in several positions but even if the right number was 20% that is still a stupidly large share of roster spots where we failed to field quality players. BLAME IDZIK. |
|
kuntysoze
Full Member
Lexington Steele fucked my ass
69%
The mods can't see me
Posts: 407
|
Post by kuntysoze on Jan 26, 2015 9:15:28 GMT -5
Interesting article, and it aligns with what I thought all along in that the team as a whole isn't that bad. If you look at point differential, the jets played like a 6-8 win team, but lost a few close ones due to terrible in-game coaching and turnovers. The Jets happen to be unusually terrible at two areas, which bring down an otherwise decent team. Aside from QB and CB, the Jets are at least league-average on RB, WR, both lines and LB.
|
|
