|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Feb 2, 2015 10:26:47 GMT -5
Whoever the fuck made that call, no, whoever even thought of it for a sec, should be shot and pissed on, literally shot and pissed on. Give that guy to Isis, the only be-heading I will approve of, well maybe that's too harsh, but I am pissed. I just can't believe it. Ok, what can we call to fuck this up, well, let's catch them off guard and call a pass play, bang your dead. You can even make a case that the hit on the receiver was early, and it was, does not matter, Lynch up the gut, he rarely misses, he is what got you there. fuck!It's Karma for winning the NFC game which they should never have won but did with too many lucky breaks. You can only do that for so long
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2015 10:28:36 GMT -5
Not a bad call, poor execution.
|
|
|
Post by greenwave on Feb 2, 2015 10:34:39 GMT -5
Not a bad call, poor execution. If you honestly believe that, then in your eyes there is no such thing as a bad call. That is easily in the running for the worst call in the history of football. The only call worse than that one in that spot, in that situation, with that roster...would have been sending out the FG kicker.
|
|
|
Post by DartTheWolf on Feb 2, 2015 10:58:15 GMT -5
It was the right call and the play was orchestrated perfectly. See, the Kearse catch wasn't supposed to happen. The Seahawks were not supposed to be anywhere near the redzone. There is a very good reason why with a minute left and the clock ticking, the Cheats didn't call a timeout. They weren't worried about getting the ball back with no time. They knew they were going to win. I believe the cornerback's name was Browner, he said in the post game interview that after the Kearse catch God told him he was going to get the next interception and how he was going to do it. That he could see it in his mind and he can't even begin to explain it. Logical and rationally evolved humans are all aware that in the incredibly rare chance god actually exists, he doesn't give a shit about football and wouldn't give a team that represents underhandedness and evil foresight of the plays to come. The CB said that, because it would have been painfully obvious in his interview that he had that advanced knowledge, and the average American is a fool enough to accept "god told me" without questioning. Both sides were called, told what play had to be run, and it was executed perfectly.
There will be no penalties for the deflating scandal. There will be no repercussions. The NFL is a tax-free organization who utilizes revenue sharing and extremely lucrative TV deals. The Flats* success means more money for the league as a whole. Goodell is not an outside independent party, he is hired by owners, has dinner with the Kraft family once a month, and revenue is UP. Going over the middle on a goal-line defense with three downs to go and a timeout on the 1 yard line is the perfect play for MONEY
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2015 12:14:04 GMT -5
Not a bad call, poor execution. If you honestly believe that, then in your eyes there is no such thing as a bad call. That is easily in the running for the worst call in the history of football. The only call worse than that one in that spot, in that situation, with that roster...would have been sending out the FG kicker. HE could have placed the ball better. Not all but almost all plays are designed to score td's.
|
|
|
Post by Sonny Werblin on Feb 2, 2015 13:00:13 GMT -5
I can understand the play call. Flats* likely expecting run, so throw the ball. Incomplete stops the clock, complete scores 6. Except I wouldn't have thrown it over the middle. Too risky. That ball gets tipped even, and it's bad news, maybe a play action pass would have been a better call. So I understand the reasoning behind the call, just baffled at the particular play call. Exactly. There were no options for the QB. It was a quick timing pass. And even if it wasn't cleanly intercepted it was in an area where it could have easily been deflected into the air and intercepted. If they wanted to pass it should have been on a play action from under center with a roll out. IMO the best play would have been a read option with Wilson having a pass/run option if he did not hand the ball to Lynch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2015 13:40:44 GMT -5
Whoever the fuck made that call, no, whoever even thought of it for a sec, should be shot and pissed on, literally shot and pissed on. Give that guy to Isis, the only be-heading I will of, well maybe that's too harsh, but I am pissed. I just can't believe it. Ok, what can we call to fuck this up, well, let's catch them off guard and call a pass play, bang your dead. You can even make a case that the hit on the receiver was early, and it was, does not matter, Lynch up the gut, he rarely misses, he is what got you there. fuck!Actually... Gil Brandt @gil_Brandt Marshawn Lynch had 5 carries from the 1-yard line this season. He scored once.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Feb 2, 2015 14:27:32 GMT -5
Not a bad call, poor execution. Poor execution yes. Bad call... maybe, maybe not. But theres at least a few things Id have tried before that play. High risk call when you have a safer higher pct option? Absofrickenlutely. Snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
|
|
Post by BEAC0NJET on Feb 2, 2015 14:28:58 GMT -5
I can understand the play call. Flats* likely expecting run, so throw the ball. Incomplete stops the clock, complete scores 6. Except I wouldn't have thrown it over the middle. Too risky. That ball gets tipped even, and it's bad news, maybe a play action pass would have been a better call. So I understand the reasoning behind the call, just baffled at the particular play call. Exactly. There were no options for the QB. It was a quick timing pass. And even if it wasn't cleanly intercepted it was in an area where it could have easily been deflected into the air and intercepted. If they wanted to pass it should have been on a play action from under center with a roll out. IMO the best play would have been a read option with Wilson having a pass/run option if he did not hand the ball to Lynch. Thats what Im saying - not saying you HAVE to run there, a pass is ok, but there were better, or at least safer, pass plays to call.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2015 14:32:29 GMT -5
Not a bad call, poor execution. Poor execution yes. Bad call... maybe, maybe not. But theres at least a few things Id have tried before that play. High risk call when you have a safer higher pct option? Absofrickenlutely. Snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Higher pass where only one player could snag it would have sealed the deal. Wilson new he only had so much room on that slant, make a lil adjustment.
|
|
|
Post by vin on Feb 2, 2015 15:33:42 GMT -5
Whoever the fuck made that call, no, whoever even thought of it for a sec, should be shot and pissed on, literally shot and pissed on. Give that guy to Isis, the only be-heading I will of, well maybe that's too harsh, but I am pissed. I just can't believe it. Ok, what can we call to fuck this up, well, let's catch them off guard and call a pass play, bang your dead. You can even make a case that the hit on the receiver was early, and it was, does not matter, Lynch up the gut, he rarely misses, he is what got you there. fuck!Actually... Gil Brandt @gil_Brandt Marshawn Lynch had 5 carries from the 1-yard line this season. He scored once.And? Since when does the Regular Season matter when it's the FUCKING SUPERBOWL? You don't think Lynch would have BEASTED-IT-UP and try to Truck the opposing Flats* D or drag several of them(ala Braylon) into the endzone? That was absolutely *THE* Worst call in such a situation I have ever seen, Period. Pete Carroll is a moron for giving the green light for this. It would've been one thing had they had NO timeouts remaining. But they had one and they could've at least used Lynch to try and power his way into the Endzone and if not, THEN they use their timeout, have about 20 or less seconds for 3rd or 4th down to get the ball into the endzone for the win. When we fans at home know what the CORRECT call should've been, it's a huge indictment on Pete who DIDN'T make the correct call. Pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by TokyoJetsFan on Feb 2, 2015 16:46:15 GMT -5
The stars were aligned fior another patriot Super Bowl loss because of a miracle catch by the other teams WR. That's as much joy as I get from a Super Bowl lately ... Seeing the Flats* get their hearts ripped out at the end. But no. You fucking had to throw it after beast mode just ripped 5 yards to the one. Marty M wouldn't even have been that fucking dumb. Life of a Jets fan. You could argue that this game was a top-10 important game in Jets franchise history in terms of impact on the fanbase's emotions. And the Jets had nothing to do with it. If you truly believe this had a top 10 historical impact on the jets fans emotions than you are even dumber than I thought you were....and I didn't think that was possible.
|
|
|
Post by 65whiteshoes on Feb 2, 2015 22:39:38 GMT -5
I can understand the play call. Flats* likely expecting run, so throw the ball. Incomplete stops the clock, complete scores 6. Except I wouldn't have thrown it over the middle. Too risky. That ball gets tipped even, and it's bad news, maybe a play action pass would have been a better call. So I understand the reasoning behind the call, just baffled at the particular play call. You run it the next play. Beast motor is revving. Put it in his hands and I'm pretty sure he gets it. Then you play action on the next play and roll Wilson out to give him the option to pass or run; this way there won't be any lineman in front to bat down or tip the pass. Question: HOW DID THE RATS KNOW WHAT EXACT PLAY WAS COMING!
|
|