|
|
Post by jcappy on Feb 25, 2015 17:21:43 GMT -5
Also per Schefter
|
|
|
|
Post by WOPtasticRCW on Feb 25, 2015 18:36:20 GMT -5
I wonder if people would prefer him or spiller.....Id take spiller but also think bush can be a good alternate.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcappy on Feb 25, 2015 18:38:30 GMT -5
Bush has had less on an injury history (not saying much) and is generally more consistent. Spiller has more potential to break off huge runs.
Kind of 50/50 in my opinion...not like we really NEED either of them TBH.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aussie Jet on Feb 25, 2015 19:21:43 GMT -5
Bush barely played this past season and turns 30 in a couple of weeks.
Do not want him.
I don't really want Spiller on the Jets, either, but in a straight race between the two of them, I'd take Spiller.
|
|
|
|
Post by joepnyj1 on Feb 25, 2015 19:32:39 GMT -5
Spiller is much better than Bush. Both of them have a bad injury history but spiller is more explosive at this point in his career.
|
|
|
|
Post by jdeacon on Feb 25, 2015 20:02:50 GMT -5
Bush should come cheap, is a great compliment to ivory. I would prefer kicking the tires on him than throwing big money at spiller, just my opinion though..
|
|
