Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2015 7:28:05 GMT -5
We have been so dominant over Miami, lol, now they will have the upper hand for 3rd over 4th in the division.
|
|
kuntysoze
Full Member
Lexington Steele fucked my ass
69%
The mods can't see me
Posts: 407
|
Post by kuntysoze on Mar 9, 2015 7:38:49 GMT -5
Say what you want about Tanny, but he came damn close two years in a row returning us to the big game. Given Izdick's tenure, I will sign up for Tanny every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Then left us a mess that we're still no close to cleaning up 4 years down the line. No thanks. Suh signing = dolphins being terrible for the next 5 years even if it works out in the short run (which I doubt because Suh is one guy on a team with multiple issues). What a dumb post. You honestly don't think we are close - AT ALL - to cleaning up the mess 4 years later? Really? In that case, who would you pick between Idzik and Tanny?
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Mar 9, 2015 10:33:42 GMT -5
Bad news. Miami's D was really good to begin with and Suh will make them top-five overnight. Now the Jets have to deal with two top-five defenses in the same division, and another that is roughly top-ten. We better get some OL help, or else this team is going to end up as the circus and laughingstock of the AFCE. Get a grip. You are completely reactionary. You should be happy that we got Brandon Marshall and still have money for other needs. And you need to look up the meaning of circus. He calls the Jets a circus in every post. We're a circus now and it won't change. This makes a circus. Cutting Harvin makes us a circus...
|
|
|
Post by Jet Nut Sauce on Mar 9, 2015 10:37:46 GMT -5
Did I miss something with Suh. He was on a Detroit team with a better D. Better QB. Better WRs. Better RBs. And he hardly won. Now people want to hand it to Tanny? For gutting his non playoff team to sign a player that doesn't address any of the teams weaknesses?
|
|
|
Post by rexneffect on Mar 9, 2015 11:42:09 GMT -5
Then left us a mess that we're still no close to cleaning up 4 years down the line. No thanks. Suh signing = dolphins being terrible for the next 5 years even if it works out in the short run (which I doubt because Suh is one guy on a team with multiple issues). What a dumb post. You honestly don't think we are close - AT ALL - to cleaning up the mess 4 years later? Really? In that case, who would you pick between Idzik and Tanny? As it stands today we are not yet a competitive team although there is good reason to feel optimistic about where we might be this year or next. Tannenbaum paid a lot of money to get the wins those years. It was a great and exciting time but he overpaid for a number of those players and had no functional plan for the future. The payment for those wins was four years of declining production and two regime changes. The choice isn't between Idzik or Tannenbaum. It was just Tannenbaum and Idzik. The combination of Tannenbaum's shitty roster plus Tannenbaum's shitty financial situation plus Woody's insistence on keeping Rex and our terrible scouting department produced a short list of candidates willing to come in and eschew spending money to dig us out of a whole but lacked a functional plan to start building a team after a necessary lean year or two. Idzik saved money like Tannenbaum spent it. Idzik was the yin to Tannenbaum's yang.
|
|
|
Post by southparkcpa on Mar 9, 2015 12:16:19 GMT -5
What a dumb post. You honestly don't think we are close - AT ALL - to cleaning up the mess 4 years later? Really? In that case, who would you pick between Idzik and Tanny? As it stands today we are not yet a competitive team although there is good reason to feel optimistic about where we might be this year or next. Tannenbaum paid a lot of money to get the wins those years. It was a great and exciting time but he overpaid for a number of those players and had no functional plan for the future. The payment for those wins was four years of declining production and two regime changes. The choice isn't between Idzik or Tannenbaum. It was just Tannenbaum and Idzik. The combination of Tannenbaum's shitty roster plus Tannenbaum's shitty financial situation plus Woody's insistence on keeping Rex and our terrible scouting department produced a short list of candidates willing to come in and eschew spending money to dig us out of a whole but lacked a functional plan to start building a team after a necessary lean year or two. Idzik saved money like Tannenbaum spent it. Idzik was the yin to Tannenbaum's yang. I would argue..the euphoria of those 2 seasons is what got Tanny in trouble. We were 11-5 and THEN he signed mark to the big deal, Holmes, let Bray go, Let Cotch go. My lasting memory of those years in HARD KNOCKS when Rex said to Tanny.."Can you believe this??". Like kids in a toy store who could do no wrong.
|
|
|
Post by The Tax Returns Are in Kenya on Mar 9, 2015 12:36:46 GMT -5
What a dumb post. You honestly don't think we are close - AT ALL - to cleaning up the mess 4 years later? Really? In that case, who would you pick between Idzik and Tanny? As it stands today we are not yet a competitive team although there is good reason to feel optimistic about where we might be this year or next. Tannenbaum paid a lot of money to get the wins those years. It was a great and exciting time but he overpaid for a number of those players and had no functional plan for the future. The payment for those wins was four years of declining production and two regime changes. The choice isn't between Idzik or Tannenbaum. It was just Tannenbaum and Idzik. The combination of Tannenbaum's shitty roster plus Tannenbaum's shitty financial situation plus Woody's insistence on keeping Rex and our terrible scouting department produced a short list of candidates willing to come in and eschew spending money to dig us out of a whole but lacked a functional plan to start building a team after a necessary lean year or two. Idzik saved money like Tannenbaum spent it. Idzik was the yin to Tannenbaum's yang. Great post
|
|